Study on Innovation and Practice of Grassroots Governance Mode in Hebei Province Promoted by Fengqiao Experience in the New Era Based on Blockchain Technology
Publicado en línea: 24 mar 2025
Recibido: 27 oct 2024
Aceptado: 19 feb 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0721
Palabras clave
© 2025 Suwei Zhang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The “Fengqiao Experience” refers to an advanced experience of social governance in Fengqiao Town, Zhuji County, Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, China. The core concept of this experience is to establish a model of grass-roots social governance with multi-party participation and democratic operation through the collaboration of the government, residents and social organizations [1-4], which is in line with China’s national conditions and adapted to the social changes in the era of globalization. Today, more and more places take the “Fengqiao experience” as a reference to create a new pattern of grass-roots social governance [5-6].
As the modernization process of Hebei Province continues to advance, the work of grassroots social governance has become an increasingly important area for the government. Grassroots social governance refers to an important work of maintaining and improving the production, life, social harmony and stability of urban and rural residents through various means and measures [7-9]. At present, grassroots social governance in Hebei Province faces many dilemmas and challenges, and there is an urgent need to explore innovative modes and methods of practice in order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of governance and ensure the stability and good social development, and the “Fengqiao Experience” of the new era can play an important role in this process [10-13]. The new era “maple bridge experience” emphasizes the way and method of solving problems, and can find the root cause of the problem and the way to solve it. At the same time, “Fengqiao Experience” focuses on community autonomy and public participation, and the active participation and autonomy of community residents can make social governance more democratic and powerful [14-17]. In addition, the new era of “Fengqiao Experience” emphasizes the concept of governance according to law and civilization and the rule of law. By following the principles of law, social governance can be more orderly and standardized [18-19].
The “Fengqiao Experience” of the new era has broad applicability in grass-roots social governance. In practice, it is necessary to combine the specific social background and problems, flexibly apply the principles and methods of “Fengqiao Experience”, innovate the mode and mechanism of social governance, continuously improve the level of grass-roots social governance, and realize the goal of social stability and harmonious development. Based on the research and interviews, and combined with the problems of “Fengqiao Experience” in practice, [20] summarized the innovation and development of “Three Governances in One” in the three aspects of self-government, rule of law and moral governance. It also emphasizes that the prerequisite for grassroots social governance to realize a social governance system of collaboration, participation and benefit sharing is to adhere to self-governance, rule of law and moral rule.
Literature [21] combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and empirical research, takes “Fengqiao experience” as the guiding ideology of grassroots psychological governance, uses governance logic and governance strategies, combines with grassroots practices based on different governance strategy priorities, and proves its effectiveness through empirical analysis. Literature [22] systematically introduces the grass-roots governance model of “three governments in one” and points out the relevant conclusions of the academia, emphasizing that the study of this model is conducive to optimizing the rural governance model, enhancing the vitality of the rural society, and maintaining the stability of the rural society.
Literature [23] discusses from multiple dimensions from the perspective of “Fengqiao experience” and points out the content construction of grassroots social governance, including the institutionalization analysis of “Fengqiao experience” and the practice path of grassroots social governance by analyzing the theoretical and practical goals of grassroots social governance construction. Literature [24] used qualitative research methods, combined with the spirit of grass-roots social governance documents, and constructed a rural grass-roots social governance model by examining the promotion of rural social governance structure. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the modernization of rural social governance capacity and the modernization of the governance system.
In modern society, grass-roots governance is an important link in promoting social stability and development. However, as society continues to change and develop, the traditional methods of grass-roots governance can no longer meet the needs of the new era. Therefore, innovating grassroots governance methods has become an urgent task. Literature [25] used semi-structured interviews to visit and collect data from community grassroots. And based on the theoretical background and interview results, it summarizes the effective strategies for the development of grassroots governance innovation, including paying attention to the application of Internet technology and strengthening personnel training. Based on empirical evidence, literature [26] analyzed the sustainability strategy of project-driven innovation in grassroots governance. By constructing a multidimensional analytical framework and utilizing a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method, the results show that innovation sustainability exhibits multiple development paths. This result provides insights into the sustainability of late project innovations. Literature [27] emphasizes the importance of social governance at the grassroots level. It emphasized that the realization of a social governance community in which everyone is responsible for and benefits from the community not only requires the improvement of the institutional development of grassroots governance, but also the realization of innovations in governance mechanisms and technologies, among others. Literature [28] used the TOE theoretical framework and fsQCA to explore the joint role and interaction of multiple factors on grassroots social governance innovation performance from multiple dimensions of technology, organization and environment. The results show that a necessary condition for achieving high innovation performance is the openness of the internal environment, and propose strategies to improve the innovation performance of grassroots social governance. Literature [29] explores the development of the multi-interested subject co-governance model by taking the voting system of livelihood projects as a research object. The case shows that this voting system builds a coordinated co-governance structure with public participation, decision-making by the local people’s congress and implementation by the local government, which realizes the balance of power and is conducive to improving governance performance.
This paper focuses on the results of grassroots social governance achieved by the Fengqiao experience, combines the wisdom of the Fengqiao experience, which is “people-oriented” and “five-governance fusion”, with the governance work of the alliance chain technology in the blockchain, and establishes the grass-roots governance model of the blockchain+Fengqiao experience. The model of blockchain + maple bridge experience is established. Through investigation and research, we analyze the service institutions and facilities of grassroots governance in China, as well as the coverage rate of integrated service facilities. Apply blockchain + maple bridge experience with Hebei rural grassroots governance practice, and use fuzzy hierarchical analysis to comprehensively evaluate the development of grassroots governance in Hebei province from four aspects: rural governmental affairs management, rural social services, rural ecological environment and rural social security.
The countryside is the basic unit of municipal society and an important place for the delivery of public services, and the level of rural services and the construction of service capacity are related to the implementation and promotion of public services. However, at present, the complexity and redundancy of the rural service process and the lack of refinement in the management of the service process have affected the improvement of the efficiency and quality of rural services, while at the same time, the diversified and multi-level needs of people’s livelihoods continue to put pressure on the work of rural services, and the improvement of the efficiency of rural services has become an important factor that affects the performance of rural governance, and a problem that needs to be urgently solved at present.
The results of statistics from the Ministry of Civil Affairs are shown in Figure 1, which shows that the coverage rate of China’s comprehensive rural service facilities will increase from 78.7% in 2020 to 93.2% in 2021, and 100% coverage will be realized by 2023. Urban rural service guidance centers, rural service centers, rural service stations, and various types of rural special service institutions and facilities have been continuously integrated and optimized to form a network of rural comprehensive service facilities, which have become an important force in the provision of rural public services.
Urban and rural community service coverage
The situation of service organizations and facilities in urban and rural areas is shown in Table 1. From the data, the coverage rate of comprehensive service facilities in China’s urban and rural areas has already reached 100 percent in 2023, and there is still a need for sustained efforts to make basic public services in urban and rural areas universally accessible and shared. As far as urban villages are concerned, although urban villages rely on administrative resources to solve the problem of the configuration of hardware and software facilities from scratch and from scarcity to abundance in a short period of time, from the point of view of concrete practice, the increasing coverage of comprehensive service facilities in villages still fails to solve the key problem of service efficiency enhancement, which is mainly manifested in the lack of innovative thinking on the way of rural public service provision and the design of service processes, insufficient informatization and network design, and insufficient hardware and network design in villages. The main performance is the lack of innovative thinking in the provision of rural public services and the design of service processes, and the insufficient design of informatization and intelligent, while the intelligence of rural hardware elements is the focus of solving this problem.
Urban and rural community service institutions and facilities
| Index | Tot | City | Countryside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community integrated services and facilities | 51.3 | 16.4 | 35.2 |
| Community service guidance center | 512 | 502 | 8 |
| Community service center | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Community service station | 43.6 | 10.6 | 32.5 |
| Community special service agencies and facilities | 6.5 | 4.9 | 2.4 |
| Community pension services and facilities | 30.7 | 8.8 | 21.6 |
| Unregistered special workers rescue support | 0.6 | - | 0.4 |
| The service agency and facilities of the whole service community | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Day care for community pension services and facilities | 11.7 | 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Support community pension services | 15.2 | 1.6 | 13.6 |
| Other community pension services and facilities | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
The key to promoting “Internet+government services” is to break the phenomena of data silos, compartmentalization and heterogeneity of multiple sources in government services. The biggest concern about sharing government information among different departments is security. Government service information undergoes the input, sharing, and storage stages, which involve the exchange and sharing of government information between different departments. This process is accompanied by the risk of information leakage. In recent years, the information system of a municipal government has been subjected to constant intrusion by hackers, spies and enemy forces, who utilize these attacks to illegally obtain governmental information, thus leading to the increasingly serious problem of e-government information security. The T0P5 distribution of the T0P5 of the flyer worm disease events in party and government organizations is shown in Figure 2.
Distribution of network security events
After investigation, it was found that these attacks are mainly implemented through the techniques of Trojans and flyer worms, and the network of political and government organizations is the most important victim of them. According to statistics, a total of 5,000 zombie Trojan and 4,600 flyer worm events occurred in a city in 2023. The top 5 party and government department types with the highest number of infections in the flyer worm incidents were People’s Government, Health, Human Resources and Social Security, Public Security and Environmental Protection, with People’s Government having as many as 1,128 infections.
“Fengqiao experience” has always been closely related to the word “advancing with the times”, throughout its development history, although the social problems faced in each historical period are different, and the role and purpose it has to play are also different, but what has remained unchanged is the basic core and basic spirit of “Fengqiao experience”, that is, “people-oriented”.
On the one hand, the establishment of the organizational network must first adhere to the party’s leadership, and the establishment of the organizational network is the primary link in the implementation of the “Fengqiao experience”. From this, it can be concluded that the leadership of the Party is the main driving force for the development of the “Fengqiao Experience” from its inception to its continuous maturity. The “Fengqiao Experience” was born out of the social and educational movement, and the cadres and masses of Zhuji City reformed the “four types of elements” in the way of reasoning and struggle, fully respected and protected the human rights and dignity of the “four types of elements”, and achieved the transformation effect beyond expectations. In the reform and opening up and the new era, in the process of implementing the party’s principles and policies, the cadres and masses of Zhuji City have creatively transformed the “Fengqiao experience”, solved the problems of different historical periods according to local conditions, and also theoretically enriched the experience of grassroots social governance in China, which is a model for the wisdom of the masses under the leadership of the party.
On the other hand, it does not only rely on the leadership of the party, but also focuses on giving play to the role of the people as masters. In the social and educational movement, the cadres and masses of Zhuji City fully considered the influence of their families, children, and living environment on the “four types of elements”, and paid attention to the role of the establishment of a new type of interpersonal relationship in transforming people’s thinking.
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the “Fengqiao Experience” in the new era has become a model of contemporary grassroots social governance. The “integration of five governance” is the main path to adhere to and develop the “Fengqiao experience” in the new era. The “integration of five governance” is precisely the development of “politics” and “intellectual governance” on the basis of “three governance”. “Integration of three governance” refers to the integration of “autonomy”, “rule of law” and “rule by virtue”, which is the core connotation of the “Fengqiao experience” and reflects the people’s wisdom of grassroots governance in China.
Block and blockchain, as shown in Figure 3, is an open, transparent, unforgeable, traceable and at the same time decentralized shared database, whose nodes in the network work together to maintain a public ledger in a trustless and decentralized manner. The number of nodes on the blockchain is not restricted as long as they adhere to the consensus mechanism, which is completely different if the consensus mechanism is different. The so-called synergistic governance refers to the situation of interdependence, common action and risk sharing among multiple subjects through coordination and cooperation. To establish a logical and logical governance structure. To promote the realization of the public interest. Synergistic governance encompasses the meaning of cooperative governance, but is not limited to simple cooperation. It is based on governance theory to emphasize the synergistic nature of governance.
Block and block chain
Existing departments collect information independently and carry out big data research and judgment in order to achieve information sharing. However, the main way of sharing is mainly through opening a part of the database. However, the degree of resource sharing in the work is relatively low. There are risks in the sharing process, and the lack of motivation for departmental sharing can also result in a lack of positive attitudes towards sharing among departments, making it impossible to share at a deeper level.
Taking the common cases in the grassroots governance process as an example, the street whistling department reports, but in fact, after the opinions of the masses in the community streets, the information is notified to the relevant departments according to the problems of the masses. However, since the mass feedback websites of various departments are independent, relevant functional departments may not be timely able to see the problems of the community and the opinions of the community through the mass incident response platform. Therefore, how to achieve comprehensive sharing, enhance the ability to strike, and improve the perception of early warning is an urgent problem to be solved. At this stage, the main factors that hinder sharing are mainly fixed working methods, technical means, and the overall lack of consensus communication. Therefore, how to achieve comprehensive sharing and improve the perception of early warning is an urgent problem to be solved. At present, the main obstacles to information sharing are fixed working methods, technical means, and the overall sense of consensus communication, etc.
Solving the problem of inter-departmental interaction through technical means is a new topic in the information age, breaking the data barriers through the alliance blockchain technology, realizing information sharing, weakening the centrality within the alliance, solving the problem of trusting between departments by technical means, and protecting privacy comprehensively, which is very suitable for immigration management scenarios. At the same time, using the advantages of blockchain technology to solve data update synchronization problems can also solve the problem of lagging residence.
Launched village-level service centers for the people to integrate the villagers to find jobs, agricultural transactions, vocational training, gas and electricity purchases, automatic bank deposit and withdrawal, mail courier, various documents annual audit and other services in the village one-stop processing, convenient and fast. The future service center is based on village livelihood, economy, industry, culture, education, medical and health care. field services and the actual supply and demand of rural resources, personnel and other elements, it must carry out more functional development and operation of the network platform, and ultimately be merged into the blockchain of big data information aggregation, and through the identification, actuarial analysis of digital technology, carry out the high-quality allocation of resource elements among other heterogeneous blocks in a wider scope, and realize the interaction of resources between different regions and the integration of industry and economy. At the same time, the blockchain application needs to be built-in with all kinds of security risk warnings, so that the township blockchain and the big data warning of grass-roots policing can realize two-way intelligent identification and analysis operating as one, and operating as one with the national police database.
The core idea of the fuzzy hierarchical analysis method, which combines fuzzy concepts with the hierarchical analysis method, is consistent with the hierarchical analysis method, which follows the principle of decomposition followed by combination. For a complex problem, it is first decomposed into different levels of constituent factors according to its nature and the overall goal to be achieved, and a multi-layer analytical structural model is formed in accordance with the affiliation relationship between the levels, as well as the superiority and inferiority levels among the various factors, and then Calculate the relative importance of the lowest level (programs, measures, indicators, etc.) relative to the highest level (the overall goal) of the weights or relative order of merit, and ultimately take appropriate methods to achieve the lowest level of indicators (programs, measures, indicators, comment sets, etc.) relative to the highest level (the overall goal) of the various types of operational issues.
Among all the factors affecting the objects in the total target layer, the degree of influence of each influencing factor is different, and in order to make a correct evaluation or decision for the objects in the total target layer and each level, it is necessary to make a corresponding weight calculation for each influencing factor. Importance calculation needs to start from the uppermost factor in the guideline layer and then proceed downwards. The specific steps are shown below.
Determine the evaluation scale As a systematic evaluation method, FAHP must be based on a unified comparison benchmark when making pairwise comparisons between factors. The results of a large number of studies show that it is most appropriate to adopt the 9-level scale that is commonly used to correspond to textual narrative evaluation. Formation of judgment matrix The judgment matrix is the result of pairwise comparisons between factors at each level. According to the evaluation criteria, experts compare the importance of each influential factor at each level and make a score, and after organizing all the scores, a judgment matrix of the weight values of the influential factors can be derived. Taking the evaluation results of The judgment matrix can be expressed as:
where the value The diagonal of the matrix is the comparison of the elements themselves, so the value 1 is The larger the value of Calculation of the weight value of each influential factor There are many ways to calculate the weights of the factors of the judgment matrix, and the sum-product method is used here. Take the factors of the first level in the criterion layer as an example, set the judgment matrix as Calculate the column normalization for each element in the judgment matrix
Summing by rows for column normalized matrices:
Divide the row sum vector by
If it is necessary to perform hierarchical total ordering for each element under the highest level (the target level), the single ordering of this level should be completed, and then continue to advance to a higher level sequentially. Let the hierarchical single sorting of each element of this level has been completed, the weight value obtained by element
This paper uses fuzzy hierarchical analysis to obtain four first-level indicators (government management, social services, ecological environment and social security) and 18 second-level indicators of the current situation of rural grassroots governance in Hebei Province, and the specific content of the indicators is shown in Table 2.
The evaluation index system of rural governance
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator |
|---|---|
| Grassroots administration | Government online service ability score |
| Complete index of online service items | |
| Online service maturity index | |
| Online service effectiveness index | |
| The business rate of the government service network | |
| Social services at the grassroots level | The number of primary clinics |
| Total number of medical technicians and physicians | |
| Popularity of library and cultural stations | |
| The education culture expenditure in the consumer expenditure of the grass-roots population is the ratio | |
| Primary ecological environment | Village greening coverage |
| Rural water penetration | |
| Waste concentration processing of administrative village ratio | |
| Access to toilet toilets in rural areas | |
| Social security at the grassroots level | The consumption expenditure of the grass-roots residents is a ratio of health care expenditure |
| The proportion of pension insurance is accounted for | |
| The proportion of medical insurance is the majority | |
| The number of grassroots old-age institutions is popular | |
| The lower number of people is a ratio |
Y Town is a jurisdiction of Z province and was named as one of the top ten demonstration towns in the country in 2021. The specific age structure of the region as of March 2022 is shown in Table 3. The total number of permanent residents in town Y is 13,547, of which 6,515 are male and 7,032 are female. 1,023 people are under the age of 7 years old, accounting for about 7.56%. 1,796 people are between the ages of 8 and 19 years old, accounting for about 13.26%. 8,993 people are between the ages of 20 and 60 years old, accounting for about 66.38%. 1,735 people are over the age of 60 years old, accounting for about 12.81%.
Community population age distribution list
| Age distribution | Tot | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 435 | 23 | 42 | 62 | 58 | 148 | 40 | 16 | 30 | 16 |
| 5-7 | 588 | 22 | 60 | 63 | 89 | 160 | 63 | 28 | 55 | 48 |
| 8-19 | 1796 | 58 | 145 | 154 | 210 | 725 | 154 | 38 | 98 | 214 |
| 20-60 | 8993 | 447 | 775 | 967 | 1231 | 2748 | 658 | 225 | 584 | 1358 |
| Over 60 | 1735 | 99 | 142 | 184 | 340 | 340 | 150 | 62 | 116 | 302 |
The party members within Township Y are shown in Table 4, with a total of 1,924 party members within Township Y, accounting for about 14.02%, including 81 registered party members, 599 working party members, and 1,244 resident party members. Registered party members are those whose party organizational relations are in Township Y and who participate in thematic party building activities on the 10th of every month. In-service party members refers to the Y township resident, party organization relations in the Y township resident units of party members, Y township in the “Pioneer micro home” small program above the release of the activities of the organization in-service party members need to participate in the activities of the Y township each year to earn small red flags, each participate in the activities of Y township assessment of qualified to obtain a small red flag, the Department of the Organization of the requirements of each party member to earn five small flags each year. The Organization Department requires each party member to earn five small flags each year. Resident party members are those who live in the Y township and whose party organization relations are not in the Y township.
Community table
| Tot | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Tot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Readership | 81 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 30 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| Incumbent | 599 | 52 | 14 | 58 | 40 | 263 | 24 | 12 | 38 | 98 |
| Resident | 1244 | 88 | 54 | 153 | 100 | 557 | 50 | 16 | 62 | 164 |
Y township to build a shared community as an opportunity, adhering to the “blockchain” model, continue to explore the new era of “maple bridge experience” of urban community governance model, efforts to create an urban version of governance samples, as an analysis of the case has a strong typicality. By exploring the community governance model and valuable experience of Y Town, this paper aims to provide effective reference for the grass-roots governance of townships in Hebei Province.
The evaluation indexes of the first-level and second-level indicators are calculated as shown in Table 5, and the weighted average of the evaluation indexes of the first-level indicators is used to express the comprehensive index of rural grass-roots governance in Hebei Province.
Rural management of Hebei province in 2019-2023
| Primary indicator | Secondary indicator | Maximum value | Minimum value | Standardized index | Weighting | Index evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grassroots administration | Government online service ability score | 0.8544 | 0.7546 | 0.3764 | 0.2763 | 0.1042 |
| Complete index of online service items | 0.8857 | 0.7008 | 0.4128 | 0.1945 | 0.0741 | |
| Online service maturity index | 0.8964 | 0.7004 | 0.4183 | 0.1425 | 0.0568 | |
| Online service effectiveness index | 0.8523 | 0.6947 | 0.3346 | 0.2745 | 0.0872 | |
| The business rate of the government service network | 0.9256 | 0.6625 | 0.6527 | 0.1112 | 0.0814 | |
| Grassroots administration 0.4073 | ||||||
| Social services at the grassroots level | The number of primary clinics | 1.0563 | 1.0224 | 0.3122 | 0.1021 | 0.1021 |
| Total number of medical technicians and physicians | 0.1754 | 0.1123 | 0.4415 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | |
| Popularity of library and cultural stations | 0.1241 | 0.0984 | 0.4002 | 0.1482 | 0.1482 | |
| The education culture expenditure in the consumer expenditure of the grass-roots population is the ratio | 0.1382 | 0.1136 | 0.4526 | 0.0745 | 0.0745 | |
| The group will serve 0.3873 | ||||||
| Primary ecological environment | Village greening coverage | 0.1642 | 0.1588 | 0.6004 | 0.1782 | 0.1025 |
| Rural water penetration | 0.9005 | 0.8145 | 0.7041 | 0.1956 | 0.1382 | |
| Waste concentration processing of administrative village ratio | 0.9432 | 0.7336 | 0.5846 | 0.2654 | 0.1546 | |
| Access to toilet toilets in rural areas | 0.9779 | 0.7245 | 0.4008 | 0.3642 | 0.1449 | |
| Primary ecological environment 0.5402 | ||||||
| Social security at the grassroots level | The consumption expenditure of the grass-roots residents is a ratio of health care expenditure | 0.1265 | 0.1124 | 0.4482 | 0.2250 | 0.098 |
| The proportion of pension insurance is accounted for | 0.6857 | 0.6129 | 0.4726 | 0.2310 | 0.1128 | |
| The proportion of medical insurance is the majority | 0.9684 | 0.1592 | 0.6228 | 0.1262 | 0.0786 | |
| The number of grassroots old-age institutions is popular | 0.2405 | 0.1887 | 0.4495 | 0.2085 | 0.0889 | |
| The lower number of people is a ratio | 0.1584 | 0.0685 | 0.4812 | 0.2586 | 0.1174 | |
| They will guarantee 0.4957 | ||||||
| Hebei primary level management composite index 0.4576 | ||||||
The 0.4576 comprehensive index for rural grass-roots governance in Hebei Province indicates a weak capacity for rural grass-roots social service governance. The comprehensive evaluation indexes of rural social security and rural government management are similar, and the effectiveness of rural social security and government management is good.
The comprehensive evaluation index of rural grassroots government management in Hebei Province is 0.4073, indicating that rural grassroots government management is relatively good, but the overall effect of governance is still remarkable. During the research, it was found that in recent years, more and more townships have opened digital government services, implemented information disclosure services for party affairs, village affairs and finances, and released policies and plans through WeChat groups or public number platforms, etc., which has improved the efficiency of rural grass-roots government management. The comprehensive evaluation index of social services at the rural grassroots level is 0.3873, the level of socialized services at the rural grassroots level is low, and medical and health care and other service facilities at the rural grassroots level are imperfect.The penetration rate of libraries and cultural stations at the rural grassroots level in Hebei and the percentage of education and cultural consumption expenditure of the rural grassroots residents in the period of 2019-2023 have been increased by 3% and 0.3%, respectively, which can be seen that the government has gradually constructed and promoted smart medical services and smart convenience service platforms, prompting rural grassroots residents to live a more convenient life, and the level of rural grassroots socialized services is constantly improving.
The comprehensive evaluation index of rural grassroots ecological environment is 0.5402, which is a relatively satisfactory result for rural grassroots ecological environment management. Hebei Province has focused on the strategic goal of rural grassroots revitalization, and has continuously strengthened ecological environmental governance to create a green and ecological living environment for rural grassroots residents.From 2019 to 2023, the green coverage rate of villages, the penetration rate of piped water in rural areas, the percentage of administrative villages with centralized garbage disposal and the penetration rate of rural sanitary toilets in Hebei Province will increase by 1%, 8%, 21% and 26% respectively, which is a remarkable result. The effect of governance is remarkable.
The comprehensive evaluation index of social security at the rural grassroots level is 0.4957, and the governance effect is good.From 2019-2023, the proportion of new pension insurance participants at the rural grassroots level in Hebei Province will increase by 7%, the proportion of basic medical insurance participants will increase by 39%, and the number of people enjoying the minimum subsistence guarantee at the rural grassroots level will decrease by 9%.Since 2015, the social security of rural residents in Hebei Province has been management has gradually adopted the blockchain + maple bridge experience management method.
Overall, the effect of rural grassroots governance in Hebei Province is relatively significant, but according to the 2019-2023 government online service capability survey and evaluation report, the comprehensive score of online service capability in Hebei Province is low, which indicates that the degree of Hebei Province’s application of the blockchain + maple bridge experience is not high enough. Although the infrastructure construction of the Internet and mobile network at the rural grassroots level in Hebei Province has been improved year by year, the impact of the traditional centralized data management model on the credibility of the data has made the rural grassroots residents feel less favorable towards the traditional management, and their willingness to use the blockchain + maple bridge experience has gradually strengthened.
The new era grassroots governance model integrates the maple bridge experience with blockchain technology, which can effectively solve many problems in traditional community governance. The governance effect of blockchain + maple bridge experience model on grassroots level in Hebei is comprehensively evaluated by fuzzy hierarchical analysis. The results of the study show that the comprehensive evaluation indexes of rural grassroots government management, social services, ecological environment and social security are 0.4073, 0.3873, 0.5402 and 0.4957, respectively, and the comprehensive index is 0.4576. This indicates that the governance capacity of social services is weak, and the comprehensive evaluation indexes of social security and government management are similar, and the governance capacity is similar. The governance effectiveness of grassroots social security is the best. Therefore, in the future, the grassroots government of Hebei Province should focus its attention on building digitalized social services, digitalized medical and health care facilities, and so on.