Acceso abierto

Research on Talent Cultivation Paths for High Quality Employment in the Perspective of Industry-Education Integration

  
21 mar 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Figure 1.

The general concept structure of QFD model of talent training
The general concept structure of QFD model of talent training

Survey of talent market competitiveness

Code Quality indicator Performance Market situation Market expectation
J1 Basic theory of entrepreneurship 5 3 1
J2 Business management knowledge 1 3 4
J3 Knowledge of financial risk 2 3 4
J4 Policy interpretation 1 4 5
J5 Entrepreneurial consciousness 5 4 5
J6 Innovative ability 2 2 4
J7 Organizational management 5 2 5
J8 Market development ability 3 2 4
J9 Contingency capacity 2 3 5
J10 Environmental control 3 3 5
J11 Communication skills 5 1 4
J12 Team ability 4 1 5
J13 Relearning ability 1 4 3
J14 Mental quality 5 1 5
J15 Good faith 3 2 5
J16 Service awareness 2 3 5
J17 Responsibility awareness 3 1 3

Talent training technical demand

Primary demand Secondary demand Tertiary requirement
Make sure that the entrepreneurs who meet the needs of the market are trained(Q) Entrepreneurship education theory teaching(Q1) Faculty(Q11)
Curriculum construction(Q12)
Teaching method(Q13)
Scientific research level(Q14)
Entrepreneurship education practice(Q2) Intramural resources(Q21)
External resources(Q22)
Entrepreneurship comprehensive quality culture(Q3) Entrepreneurial atmosphere(Q23)
Mental health education(Q24)
Entrepreneurship character(Q4) Literacy education(Q41)
Entrepreneurship education management service(Q5) Education effect evaluation(Q51)
Incentive mechanism construction(Q52)
Project consulting and tracking services(Q53)

High quality employment capacity demand

Primary demand Secondary demand Tertiary requirement
The entrepreneurs who adapt to the needs of the entrepreneurial market(J) Entrepreneurial knowledge(J1) Basic theory of entrepreneurship(J11)
Business management knowledge(J12)
Knowledge of financial risk(J13)
Policy interpretation(J14)
Creative entrepreneurship(J2) Entrepreneurial consciousness(J21)
Innovative ability(J22)
Business skills(J3) Organizational management(J31)
Market development ability(J32)
Contingency capacity(J33)
Environmental control(J34)
The comprehensive quality of entrepreneurship(J4) Communication skills(J41)
Team ability(J42)
Relearning ability(J43)
Mental quality(J44)
Entrepreneurial character(J5) Good faith(J51)
Service awareness(J52)
Responsibility awareness(J53)

The weight results are summarized and combined

Criterion layer AHP weight The right to entropy is heavy Composite weight Index layer AHP weight The right to entropy is heavy Composite weight
J1 0.262 0.189 0.232 J11 0.065 0.049 0.061
J12 0.12 0.052 0.058
J13 0.055 0.033 0.028
J14 0.022 0.055 0.085
J2 0.065 0.105 0.085 J21 0.032 0.058 0.045
J22 0.033 0.047 0.04
J3 0.296 0.225 0.262 J31 0.074 0.058 0.085
J32 0.085 0.047 0.093
J33 0.066 0.063 0.025
J34 0.071 0.057 0.059
J4 0.255 0.215 0.192 J41 0.061 0.058 0.042
J42 0.102 0.039 0.036
J43 0.085 0.072 0.029
J44 0.007 0.046 0.085
J5 0.122 0.266 0.229 J51 0.052 0.088 0.069
J52 0.039 0.036 0.077
J53 0.031 0.142 0.083

The requirement elements are related to the characteristics

Demand indicator Mass expansion characteristic
Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q41 Q51 Q52 Q53
J11 4.7 2.7 3.5 4.2 3.2 4.3 3.3 4.9 1.9 2.7 2 4.3
J12 4.2 5.1 2.2 2.4 4.9 3.8 2.7 3.3 2.7 3.4 4.6 2.3
J13 4.4 3.6 1.1 3.9 4.3 4.2 3.8 4.8 2.9 3.8 4.7 0.9
J14 3.5 4.3 4.7 3.4 4.7 4.9 3 2.9 3.5 4 4 4.6
J21 2.6 2.5 4.9 3.2 2.7 3.2 4 5 3.4 4 3.1 2.3
J22 2.3 4.4 4.1 3.6 4.9 3.8 1.1 4.2 3.7 3.4 4.7 3.5
J31 4.4 4 5.9 2.3 4.2 3.6 2.4 2.3 4 4.5 3.1 2.7
J32 5.4 4.1 3.7 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.9 2.3 2.3 4.2 3.1 4.6
J33 4.9 4.2 4.3 2 5.5 4.8 1.5 5.4 4.3 4.2 2.3 3.6
J34 2.5 4.3 4.6 3.2 4.3 5.1 4.8 4.3 3.9 3.7 5.2 3.6
J41 3.8 2.6 3.9 4.1 3.8 4.2 2.8 4 3.2 4.6 4.2 3.6
J42 5.5 2.9 3.6 2.9 3.1 4.8 3 4.9 2.1 4 1.9 4.6
J43 4.5 4.1 1.7 2.2 5.7 3.4 2.6 2.2 2.1 3.1 5.2 3.7
J44 4.2 3.7 1.3 4 3.6 4.2 3.8 4.8 2.6 2.9 3.7 0.5
J51 4 2.8 5.6 1.7 3 3.9 3.5 2.6 2.7 4 3.3 5.8
J52 3 4 5 3.7 1.8 3.2 4.3 5.6 3.5 3.7 1.7 2.4
J53 0.9 4.8 3.8 3.4 4.5 4.7 1.6 5.9 4.3 3.6 4.7 3.5

The talent training feature is the final weight ranking

Demand indicator Weighting Mass expansion characteristic
Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q41 Q51 Q52 Q53
J11 0.061 4.7 2.7 3.5 4.2 3.2 4.3 3.3 4.9 1.9 2.7 2 4.3
J12 0.058 4.2 5.1 2.2 2.4 4.9 3.8 2.7 3.3 2.7 3.4 4.6 2.3
J13 0.028 4.4 3.6 1.1 3.9 4.3 4.2 3.8 4.8 2.9 3.8 4.7 0.9
J14 0.085 3.5 4.3 4.7 3.4 4.7 4.9 3 2.9 3.5 4 4 4.6
J21 0.045 2.6 2.5 4.9 3.2 2.7 3.2 4 5 3.4 4 3.1 2.3
J22 0.04 2.3 4.4 4.1 3.6 4.9 3.8 1.1 4.2 3.7 3.4 4.7 3.5
J31 0.085 4.4 4 5.9 2.3 4.2 3.6 2.4 2.3 4 4.5 3.1 2.7
J32 0.093 5.4 4.1 3.7 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.9 2.3 2.3 4.2 3.1 4.6
J33 0.025 4.9 4.2 4.3 2 5.5 4.8 1.5 5.4 4.3 4.2 2.3 3.6
J34 0.059 2.5 4.3 4.6 3.2 4.3 5.1 4.8 4.3 3.9 3.7 5.2 3.6
J41 0.042 3.8 2.6 3.9 4.1 3.8 4.2 2.8 4 3.2 4.6 4.2 3.6
J42 0.036 5.5 2.9 3.6 2.9 3.1 4.8 3 4.9 2.1 4 1.9 4.6
J43 0.029 4.5 4.1 1.7 2.2 5.7 3.4 2.6 2.2 2.1 3.1 5.2 3.7
J44 0.085 4.2 3.7 1.3 4 3.6 4.2 3.8 4.8 2.6 2.9 3.7 0.5
J51 0.069 4 2.8 5.6 1.7 3 3.9 3.5 2.6 2.7 4 3.3 5.8
J52 0.077 3 4 5 3.7 1.8 3.2 4.3 5.6 3.5 3.7 1.7 2.4
J53 0.083 0.9 4.8 3.8 3.4 4.5 4.7 1.6 5.9 4.3 3.6 4.7 3.5
Mass expansion characteristic Initial importance 4.38 4.938 6.428 3.609 1.949 3.081 1.713 5.979 5.968 0.857 3.503 7.555
Center degree 17.242 12.941 13.394 15.421 15.728 12.19 8.803 10.681 12.842 11.003 16.693 16.272
Ultimate importance 0.441 2.202 0.896 0.574 1.552 1.461 1.268 1.036 0.893 1.542 1.605 2.238
Ranking 12 2 9 11 4 6 7 8 10 5 3 1

Survey on technical competitiveness of talents training

Code Quality indicator Performance Market situation Market expectation
I1 Faculty 4 4 5
I2 Curriculum Construction 1 2 2
I3 Teaching Method 1 3 3
I4 Scientific Research Level 4 5 5
I5 Intramural Resources 2 5 5
I6 External Resources 3 0 5
I7 Entrepreneurial Atmosphere 2 2 5
I8 Mental Health Education 3 4 4
I9 Literacy Education 2 5 3
I10 Education Effect Evaluation 2 5 2
I11 Incentive Mechanism Construction 2 1 3
I12 Project Consulting and Tracking Services 4 3 5

DEMATEL calculation results of talent quality characteristics

Quality characteristics of talent Influence degree Influence degree Center degree Reason
Q11 6.122 9.108 14.324 -0.43
Q12 5.469 7.252 12.529 -0.396
Q13 8.126 5.188 13.212 -1.075
Q14 7.772 6.191 14.518 1.174
Q21 7.852 6.96 13.923 0.348
Q22 6.138 8.194 12.954 -0.747
Q23 4.273 4.926 11.897 -1.457
Q24 7.076 5.216 15.314 0.766
Q41 5.039 9.382 11.843 0.089
Q51 5.658 6.755 8.662 0.362
Q52 5.123 5.338 11.286 0.2
Q53 6.586 7.917 12.293 0.871

The quality characteristics of talents and the correlation statistics

Market demand Demand correlation
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12
J1 5 5 5 5 5 2 3 4 1 5 5 5
J2 5 5 4 5 5 3 2 0 0 4 1 0
J3 5 4 5 4 3 1 5 2 0 5 2 1
J4 3 5 4 1 5 3 3 1 5 2 2 4
J5 4 3 5 1 5 5 5 0 2 1 3 2
J6 4 5 5 4 1 5 3 0 4 3 2 4
J7 5 4 5 4 5 5 2 5 3 3 5 1
J8 5 2 1 1 5 5 5 3 1 3 5 5
J9 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 3 0 4 0 0
J10 5 1 5 4 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 0
J11 2 1 2 1 5 5 5 4 5 3 1 4
J12 5 5 0 1 4 4 3 4 3 0 5 2
J13 5 3 2 7 5 5 2 2 1 2 5 2
J14 3 2 5 2 3 5 5 4 4 2 2 1
J15 2 5 5 2 5 3 3 4 5 5 1 3
J16 4 3 7 5 5 5 2 0 5 4 2 3
J17 5 3 3 2 4 4 5 2 4 1 0 0