The Construction of Blended Teaching Model of College English in Applied Colleges and Universities Based on Neural Networks
05 feb 2025
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 05 feb 2025
Recibido: 17 sept 2024
Aceptado: 21 dic 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0062
Palabras clave
© 2025 Manli Jia, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Evaluation index table of mixed teaching
| Dimension | Primary indicator | Secondary indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed teaching evaluation | Pre-class study evaluation | Number of students check-in |
| Watch the number of video | ||
| Frequency of interaction | ||
| Online test number | ||
| Clear task target | ||
| Teaching evaluation in class | Classroom discipline (test attendance, etc.) | |
| Group cooperation | ||
| Classroom performance (discussion interaction) | ||
| The teaching is serious and sensitive | ||
| Attitude is rigorous and refined | ||
| counselling | ||
| Focus on guidance and inspiration | ||
| Heavy difficulty | ||
| Attention concentration | ||
| Theoretical combination | ||
| Teaching evaluation in class | Online work | |
| Online test | ||
| Online discussion interaction | ||
| Basic knowledge | ||
| Online test scores |
Mixed teaching evaluation results
| Number | Network training value | Actual evaluation | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.911 | 0.9 | good |
| 2 | 0.689 | 0.7 | medium |
| 3 | 0.878 | 0.9 | good |
| 4 | 0.716 | 0.7 | medium |
| 5 | 0.987 | 1 | superior |
| 6 | 0.716 | 0.7 | medium |
| 7 | 0.525 | 0.5 | passing |
| 8 | 0.414 | 0.4 | passing |
| 9 | 0.656 | 0.6 | medium |
| 10 | 0.978 | 1 | superior |
| 11 | 0.667 | 0.7 | superior |
| 12 | 0.545 | 0.5 | passing |
| 13 | 0.567 | 0.5 | passing |
| 14 | 0.787 | 0.7 | medium |
| 15 | 0.301 | 0.3 | bad |
The two groups carry out the English level of the teaching model
| Group | Measurement type | Mean of achievement | Standard deviation | The difference is 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
| Experimental group | Pre-model | 80.26 | 2.178 | 10.451 | 13.478 |
| After the model is implemented | 95.67 | 3.115 | |||
| Reference group | Pre-model | 81.09 | 2.124 | 7.665 | 10.745 |
| After the model is implemented | 91.23 | 3.415 | |||
Evaluation index system of mixed teaching
| Dimension | Primary indicator | Secondary indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-class study evaluation | X1 | Number of students check-in |
| X2 | Watch the number of video | |
| X3 | Frequency of interaction | |
| X4 | Online test number | |
| X5 | Clear task target | |
| Teaching evaluation in class | X6 | Classroom discipline (test attendance, etc.) |
| X7 | Group cooperation | |
| X8 | Classroom performance (discussion interaction) | |
| X9 | The teaching is serious and sensitive | |
| X10 | Attitude is rigorous and refined | |
| X11 | counselling | |
| X12 | Focus on guidance and inspiration | |
| X13 | Heavy difficulty | |
| X14 | Attention concentration | |
| X15 | Theoretical combination | |
| Teaching evaluation in class | X16 | Online work |
| X17 | Online test | |
| X18 | Online discussion interaction | |
| X19 | Basic knowledge | |
| X20 | Online test scores |