Romanian adaptation of Centrality of Religiosity Scale and the utility of this scale in cognitive- behavioral therapy for religious populations

1. Naeem F, Gul M, Irfan M et al. Brief Culturally adapted CBT(CaCBT) for depression: A randomized Controlled trial from Pakistan. J Affect Disord. 2015; 177: 101-107.10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.01225766269Search in Google Scholar

2. Ramos K, Erkanli A, Koenig HG. Effects of religious versus conventional cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) on suicidal thoughts in major depression and chronic medical illness. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 2018; 10(1): 79–87.Search in Google Scholar

3. David H. Rosmarin ES, Hoffnung BG, Appe M. Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression Among Orthodox Jews. Cogn Behav Pract. 2019; 26: 676 – 687.10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.07.005Search in Google Scholar

4. Algahtani H, Almulhim A, AlNajjar F, Ali M, Irfan M, Ayub M, Naeem F. Cultural adaptation of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for patients with depression and anxiety in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain: A qualitative study exploring views of patients, carers, and mental health professionals. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2019;12 (E44): 1-17.10.1017/S1754470X1900028XSearch in Google Scholar

5. Huber S, Huber OW. The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions. 2012; 3(3): 710-724.10.3390/rel3030710Search in Google Scholar

6. Esperandio MRG, August H, Viacava JJC, Huber S, Fernandes ML. Brazilian Validation of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS-10BR and CRS-5BR). Religions. 2019; 10(9):508.10.3390/rel10090508Search in Google Scholar

7. Glock CY. Religion in Sociological Perspective: Essays in the empirical study of religion. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Belomont,1973Search in Google Scholar

8. Stark R, Glock CY. American Piety: The nature of religious commitment. CA: Berkley University Press. LA, 1968Search in Google Scholar

9. Gheorghe H. The psychometric properties of a Romanian version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS 15). Religions. 2019; 10(1): 11.10.3390/rel10010011Search in Google Scholar

10. Maison D, Marchlewska M, Rizqy AZ, Syarifah D, Purba, H. Religiously permissible consumption. J. Islam. Mark. 2019;11(3): 948-960.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dimitrova R, del Carmen Domínguez Espinosa A. Factorial structure and measurement invariance of the four basic dimensions of religiousness scale among Mexican males and females. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 2017; 9(2): 231-238.Search in Google Scholar

12. Proyer RT, Laub N. The German-language version of the Expressions of Spirituality Inventory-Revised: Adaptation and initial validation: Research and reviews. Curr Psychol. 2017; 36(1): 1-13.10.1007/s12144-015-9379-xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Czyzowska D, Mikolajewska, K. Religijnosc a rozwój rozumowania moralnego w okresie adolescent [Religiosity and development of moral reasoning in adolescence]. Psychologia Rozwojowa. 2012; 17(2): 55-70.Search in Google Scholar

14. Grover S, Dua D. Translation and adaptation into Hindi of Central Religiosity Scale, brief Religious Coping Scale (brief RCOPE), and Duke University religion index (DUREL). Indian J Psychol Med.2019; 41(6): 556-561.10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_304_18687583931772443Search in Google Scholar

15. Kaplan B, Hardesty JJ, Martini S, Megatsari H, Kennedy RD, Cohen JE. The effectiveness of cigarette pack health warning labels with religious messages in an urban setting in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019; 16(21): 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

16. Reyes MES, Ballesteros KCA, Bandol PAA, Jimenez, KAH, Malangen, SDR. Religiosity, gender role beliefs, and attitudes toward lesbians and gays in the Philippines. N Am J of Psychol. 2019; 21(3): 559-571.Search in Google Scholar

17. Heim L, Schaal S. Rates and predictors of mental stress in Rwanda: Investigating the impact of gender, persecution, readiness to reconcile and religiosity via a structural equation model. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014; 8: 37.10.1186/1752-4458-8-37441400025926870Search in Google Scholar

18. Fradelos EC. Connecting the dots: Understanding the relationship between religiosity, psychological resilience, and depression in breast cancer patients. Progress in Health Sciences. 2019; 9(1): 98-104.10.5604/01.3001.0013.3694Search in Google Scholar

19. Lee JC, Kuang X. Validation of the Chinese version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS): Teacher perspectives. Religions. 2020; 11(5): 266.10.3390/rel11050266Search in Google Scholar

20. Wekhian AJ. Conflict Behavior in the Workplace: A Study of Second Generation Arab Muslim Immigrants in the United States. Int J Bus Manag. 2015; 10(12): 1-20.10.5539/ijbm.v10n12p12Search in Google Scholar

21. Friedrich-Killinger, S. Centrality of religiosity as a resource for therapy outcome? Religions. 2020; 11(4): 155.10.3390/rel11040155Search in Google Scholar

22. Fradelos EC, Latsou D, Mitsi D et al. Assessment of the relation between religiosity, mental health, and psychological resilience in breast cancer patients. Wspólczesna Onkologia. 2018; 22(3): 172-177.10.5114/wo.2018.78947623809130455589Search in Google Scholar

23. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 19.0). [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

24. JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.13.1) [Computer software]. Accessed January 06, 2021. https://jasp-stats.org/download/Search in Google Scholar

25. David D, Gherman A, Podina I, Mogoaşe C, Sucală M, Voinescu B. The added value of CBT in the genetic counseling process: concept development, state of the art and new directions. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2016; 34(4): 310–331.10.1007/s10942-016-0245-zSearch in Google Scholar

26. David D, Lynn SJ, Ellis A. (eds). Rational and irrational beliefs: Research, theory, and clinical practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195182231.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

27. Schenk A, Popa CO, Olah P, Suciu N, Cojocaru C. The Efficacy of Rational Behavior Therapy Intervention in Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Acta Medica Marisiensis. 2020; 66(4):148-151.Search in Google Scholar

28. Popa CO, Predatu R, Lee WC et al. Thought Suppression in Primary Psychotic Disorders and Substance/Medication Induced Psychotic Disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(1):166.Search in Google Scholar