[1. Sadighi A, Sabetian A, Soltanmohammadlo F. A Comparison between Allograft and Autograft methods on the Rate of Union in Comminuted Fracture of Long Bones. Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2015;37(1):34-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Boer C dP, Patka F, Bakker H, Haarman M. Current Concepts of Fracture Healing, Delayed Unions, and Nonunions. Osteo Trauma Care 2002;10(1):1-7.10.1055/s-2002-30627]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Tay BK, Patel VV, Bradford DS. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(4):615-2310.1016/S0030-5898(05)70114-0]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Kainer MA, Linden JV, Whaley DN et al. Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(25):2564-71.10.1056/NEJMoa02322215201413]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Dorea HC, McLaughlin RM, Cantwell HD et al. Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or Bioglass. Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology: VCOT. 2005;18(3):157-68.10.1055/s-0038-1632947]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Udupa KN, Prasad GC. Chemical and Histochemical Studies on the Organic Constituents in Fracture Repair in Rats. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963;45(4):770-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert review of medical devices. 2006;3(1):49-57.10.1586/17434440.3.1.4916359252]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Nandi SK, Roy S, Mukherjee P et al. Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: a review. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:15-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Babaei S, Changizy Ashtiani S. Comparative Assessment of the Healing process of Two Kinds of Endochondral Bone Allografts with each other and with Intramembranous Allografts Assisted by Double Deantigenization. RJMS. 2007;14(55):35-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Işik M, Özdemir HM, Sakaoğullari A et al. The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods. Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2017;47(6):1728-35.10.3906/sag-1703-16629306231]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Tian P, Hu W-q, Li Z-j et al. Comparison of autograft and allograft tendons in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(27).10.1097/MD.0000000000007434550218128682908]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Vining NC, Warme WJ, Mosca VS. Comparison of structural bone autografts and allografts in pediatric foot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):714-8.10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b6c8222955536]Search in Google Scholar
[13. McNeilan RJ, Everhart JS, Mescher PK et al. Graft Choice in Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Rates of Recurrent Instability and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Autograft, Allograft, and Synthetic Options. Arthroscopy. 2017.10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.02729366741]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Tinao LAA, Ranalletta M. Distal femur osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after grade III open fractures in pediatric patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(5):312-5.10.1097/00005131-200405000-0000915105755]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Peyvandi M, Eshraghi R. Two case reports of widespread use of allografts in the treatment of open fractures of the femur. Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran. 2008;26(2):265-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK et al. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevelanterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. The Spine Journal. 2003;3(6):451-9.10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00173-6]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Grier KM, Walling AK. The use of tricortical autograft versus allograft in lateral column lengthening for adult acquired flatfoot deformity: an analysis of union rates and complications. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(9):760-9.10.3113/FAI.2010.0760]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Xu W, Yang S, Li B et al. [Allogeneic cortical bone cage support combining with autologous cancellous bone grafting for managing femoral head necrosis]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(5):527-9. [Article in Chinese]]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kong Z, Tian D, Yu H et al. [Treatment of traumatic bone defect with graft material of allogenic cancellous combined with autologous red marrow]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Oct;22(10):1251-4. [Article in Chines].]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Rhodes J, Mansour A, Frickman A et al. Comparison of Allograft and Bovine Xenograft in Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy for Flatfoot Deformity in Cerebral Palsy. J Pediatr. Orthop. 2017;37(3):e202-e8.10.1097/BPO.0000000000000822]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Hudgens JL, Gillette BP, Krych AJ et al. Allograft versus autograft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(02):109-16.10.1055/s-0032-1319778]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71(6):354-61.10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Behairy Y Jasty M. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in hip and knee surgery. Orthopedic Clinics. 1999;30(4):661-71.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70118-8]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM et al. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. JBJS. 2001;83:98–103.10.2106/00004623-200100022-0000711712842]Search in Google Scholar