[1. Adamczak S. (2008), Surface geometric measurements – in Polish, WNT, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Al-Hariri L. A., Leonhardt B., Nowotarski M., Magi J., Chambliss K., Venzel T., Delekar S. and Acquah S. (2016), Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene as Additives in 3D Printing. Carbon Nanotubes, Current Progress of their Polymer Composites, 221–251, https://scholarworks.umass.edu/chem_faculty_pubs/1448.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Alsoufi M. S., Elsayed A. E., (2018), Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy - A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% In-fill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer, Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 11–40.10.4236/msa.2018.91002]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bähr F., Westkamper E. (2018) Correlations between Influencing Parameters and Quality Properties of Components Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling, Procedia CIRP, 72, 1214–1219.10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.048]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barczewski M., Chmielewska D., Sterzyński T., Andrzejewski J. (2012), The assessment of properties of nucleated isotactic polypropylene modified with silsesquioxanes – in Polish, Przetwórstwo Tworzyw, 5, 409–413.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Blok L. G., Longana M. L., Yu H., Woods B. K. S. (2018), An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic, Additive Manufacturing, 22, 176–186.10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Calcagnile P., Cacciatore G., Demitri C., Montagna F. and Corcione C. E. (2018), Fused Deposition Modeling 3D PrinterA Feasibility Study of Processing Polydimethylsiloxane–Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Composites by a Low-Cost Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer, Materials, 11, 1578, 1–14.10.3390/ma11091578616370730200428]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dikshit V., Nagalingam A., Yap Y. L., Sing S. L., Yeong W. Y. and Wei J. (2017), Investigation of quasi-static indentation response of inkjet printed sandwich structures under various indenter geometries, Materials, 10 (3), 290, 1–18.10.3390/ma10030290550331028772649]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dudek P., Zagórski K. (2017), Cost, resources, and energy efficiency of Additive Manufacturing, E3S Web of Conferences, ISSN 2267-1242, 14, 1–8.10.1051/e3sconf/20171401040]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Duo Dong Goh, Yee Ling Yap, Shweta Agarwala, and Wai Yee Yeong (2019), Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite, Adv. Mater. Technol., 4, WILEYVCH Weinheim, 856–863.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gołębiowski J. (2004), Polymer nanocomposites. Structure, synthesis and properties – in Polish. Przemysł Chemiczny, 83, 1, 15–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Grzesik W. (2016), Prediction of the Functional Performance of Machined Components Based on Surface Topography: State of the Art, 25(10), 4460–4468.10.1007/s11665-016-2293-z]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Guillemot G.,Bigerelle M., and Khawaja Z. (2014), 3D Parameter to Quantify the Anisotropy Measurement of Periodic Structures on Rough Surfaces, Scanning, 36, 127–133.10.1002/sca.2110823824916]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hashimoto F. (2016), Characteristics and Performance of surface created by various finishing methods, Procedia CIRP, 45, 1–6.10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.052]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Hofstätter T., Pedersen, Bue D., Tosello G., Nørgaard H. (2019), State-of-the-art of fiber-reinforced polymers in additive manufacturing technologies, Journal of Reinforced Plastics & Composites, 36(15), 1061–1073.10.1177/0731684417695648]Search in Google Scholar
[16. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015, Additive manufacturing – General principles – Terminology.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kaczyński R., Wilczewska I., A. Sfiridienok (2014), Peculiarities of the wear mechanism of polymers reinforced with unidirectional carbon fibers, Friction and Wear, 35 (6), 449–454.10.3103/S1068366614060178]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Knoop F., Kloke A., and Schoeppner V. (2018), Quality improvement of FDM parts by parameter optimization, AIP Conference Proceedings, 190001-1–190001-5.10.1063/1.5016790]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kumar S., Panneerselvam K. (2016), Two-body Abrasive Wear Behavior of Nylon 6 and Glass Fiber Reinforced (GFR) Nylon 6 Composite, Procedia Technology, 25 (2016) 1129–1136.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kwiatkowski D., Kwiatkowska M. (2012), Numerical analysis of volume shrinkage of polyacetal composites with glass fibre – in Polish, Przetwórstwo Tworzyw, 5, 452–455.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Ligon S.C., Liska R., Stampfl J., Gurr M. and Mulhaupt R. (2017), Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing, Chemical Review, 117, 10212−10290.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074555310328756658]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Liua Z., Lei Q., Xinga S. (2019), Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 8(5), 3741–3751.10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Loncierz D., Kajzer W. (2016), Influence of 3D printing parameters in the FDM technology on mechanical and utility properties of objects made of PLA – in Polish, Aktualne Problemy Biomechaniki, No. 10, 43–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Mathiaa T. G., Pawlus P., Wieczorowski M. (2011), Recent trends in surface metrology, Wear, Vol. 271, No. 3–4, 494–508.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Mohan N., Senthil P., Vinodh S. & Jayanth N. (2017), A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 12, No. 1, 47–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Nuñez P. J., Rivas A., García-Plaza E., BeamudE., Sanz-Lobera A. (2015), Dimensional and surface texture characterization in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with ABS plus, The Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference MESIC 2015, Procedia Engineering,132, 856–863.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.570]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Petropoulos G., Pandazaras C. N., Davim P. (2010), Surface Texture Characterization and Evaluation Related to Machining. Surface Integrity in Machining, Springer, 37–66.10.1007/978-1-84882-874-2_2]Search in Google Scholar
[28. PN-EN ISO 25178-6 (2011), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Areal — Part 6: Classification of methods for measuring surface texture – in Polish.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. PN-EN ISO 286-1 (2011), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes – Part 1: Basis of tolerances, deviations and fits – in Polish.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. PN-EN ISO 4287:1999/A1 (2010), Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Profile method - Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters – in Polish.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. PN-EN ISO 4288 (1997), Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile method — Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture - in Polish.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Prusinowski A., Kaczyński R. (2017), Simulation of processes occurring in the extrusion head used in additive manufacturing technology, Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 11 (4), 317–321.10.1515/ama-2017-0049]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Roberson D.A., Shemelya C. M., MacDonald E., Wicker R. B. (2015), Expanding the Applicability of FDM-type Technologies Through Materials Development, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (2),137–143.10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0165]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Singh R., Vatsalya (2015), Evolution of 3D Surface Parameters: A Comprehensive Survey, The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4 (2), 4–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Spoerk M., Holzer C., Gonzalez-Gutierrez J. (2019), Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage, J. Appl. Polym. SCI, DOI: 10.1002/app.48545, 1–14.10.1002/app.48545]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Tomiċ D., Fuduriċ A., Mihaliċ T., Simuniċ N. (2017), Dimensional accuracy of prototypes made with FDM technology, Journal of Energy Technology, 2, 51–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Triantaphyllou A., Giusca C., Macaulay G., Roerig F., Hoebel M., Leach R., Tomita B., Milne K. (2015), Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 3, 1–8.10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Umaras E.,Tsuzuki M. S. G. (2017), Additive Manufacturing - Considerations on Geometric Accuracy and Factors of Influence, IFAC PapersOnLine, 50 (1), 14940–14945.10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2545]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Wang T.- M., Xi J.-U., Jin Y. (2007), A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33, 1087–1096.10.1007/s00170-006-0556-9]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Wieczorowski M. (2013), Theoretical basis of spatial analysis of surface asperities – in Polish, Inżynieria Maszyn, 18(3), 7–34. www.formfutura.com (access 07.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[41. www.markforged.com (access 07.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[42. www.rp-tech.pl (access 07.09.2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Zabala A., Blunt L., Wilson W., Aginagalde A., Gomez X. and Mondragon I. L. (2018), The use of areal surface topography characterisation in relation to fatigue performance, MATEC Web of Conferences, 165, 1–6.10.1051/matecconf/201816514013]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Zawistowski H. (2008), Basics of the theory of shaping the properties of products in the process of injection of thermoplastics – in Polish, Mechanik, 4, 274–280.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Żuchowska D. (2000), Constructional polymers – in Polish, WNT, Warszawa]Search in Google Scholar