Acceso abierto

Legal regulation of drug advertising and its restrictions in the conditions of the Slovak Republic


Cite

[1] Act no. 147/2001 Coll. on advertising and on the amendment and supplementation of certain laws, as amended,Search in Google Scholar

[2] Act no. 308/2000 Coll. on broadcasting and retransmission, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Act no. 362/2011 Coll. on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices and on Amendments to Certain Acts, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Act no. 513/1991 Coll. Commercial Code, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Act no. 71/1967 Coll. on Administrative Procedure (Administrative Procedure), as amendedSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Benda-Prokeinová R., Dobeš K., Mura L., Buleca J. Engel’s Approach as a tool for estimating consumer behaviour. E & M Ekonomie a Management. 2017;20:15-29.10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-002Search in Google Scholar

[7] Constitutional Act of Slovak national council no. 460/1992 Coll. Constitution of the Slovak Republic, as amendedSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Decision of the Ministry of Health SR no. S07207-OP-2014 of 02.09 2014Search in Google Scholar

[9] Decision of the State Institute for Drug Control no. 11/534 of 31. 01. 201110.1097/01.NT.0000403770.00527.07Search in Google Scholar

[10] Decision of the State Institute for Drug Control no. 580/2014/600 of 22. 05. 2014Search in Google Scholar

[11] Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001, 2001/83 / EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Duľová Spišáková E., Mura, L., Gontkovičová, B., Hajduová, Z. 2017. R&D in the context of Europe 2020 in selected countries. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research. 2017;51:243 – 261.Search in Google Scholar

[13] European Parliament and Council Directive No. 2006/114 / EC of 12 December 2006 on misleading and comparative advertisingSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Chovancová J. Philosophy of democracy and principles of democracy. Progress in economic sciences. 2016;3:41-51.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 April 2009 in Case C-421/07 Anklagemyndigheden /Frede Damgaard [2009] ECR p. I-026929, section 21Search in Google Scholar

[16] Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic no. 5 Obo 138/2000Search in Google Scholar

[17] Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic no. 5Sžo 41/2011Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kotler P. Marketing management. Praha: Victoria publishing; 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mészáros M. “Employing” of self-employed persons. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management. 2018;1:31-50.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Olšovská A., Mura L., Švec M. 2015. The most recent legislative changes and their impact on interest by enterprises in agency employment: What is next in human resource management? Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2015;13:47-54.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ovečková O., Csach K., Frindrich J. et al. Obchodný zákonník Veľký komentár Zväzok 1 (§1 až 260). Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Payne A. Marketing Služeb. Praha: Grada publishing; 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Siminská E., Šimeková, Z., Gyárfáš, J. Reklama liekov v kontexte európskej a slovenskej legislatívy. Bulletin slovenskej advokácie. 2013;10:14-26.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Tyrolová M. Aktuálne aspekty právnej úpravy reklamy liekov. Justičná revue. 2007;11:1422-1425.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Vozár J. Reklama na lieky. Duševné vlastníctvo. 2006;10:33-38.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Žuľová J., Švec M., Madleňák, A. Personality aspects of the employee and their exploration from the GDPR perspective. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management. 2018;1:51-60.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2453-6725
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Pharmacy, other