Assessment of the Welfare of Extensively Managed Autochtonous Sheep Breed Vlasicka Zackel using Animal-Based Measurements

1. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 2012, 10(6): 2767, 29.10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767Search in Google Scholar

2. FAO STATISTICAL YEAR BOOK (FAOSTAT). World food and agriculture. Rome, 2019. Production of sheep in the world. [http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA/visualize].Search in Google Scholar

3. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare: Scientific Opinion on the welfare risks related to the farming of sheep for wool, meat and milk production. EFSA Journal 2014, 12:1–128.10.2903/sp.efsa.2015.EN-738Search in Google Scholar

4. Morris S: Overview of sheep production systems. In: Ferguson D, Lee C, Fisher A, editors. Advances in sheep welfare. 1st edition. Woodhead Publishing; 2017, 19–33.10.1016/B978-0-08-100718-1.00002-9Search in Google Scholar

5. Goddard P, Waterhouse T, Dwyer C, Stott A: The perception of the welfare of sheep in extensive systems. Small Rumin Res 2006, 62: 215–225.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.016Search in Google Scholar

6. Richmond SE, Wemelsfelder F, de Heredia IB, Ruiz R, Canali E, Dwyer CM: Evaluation of Animal-Based Indicators to Be Used in a Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sheep. Front Vet Sci 2017, 4:210.10.3389/fvets.2017.00210573213929322048Search in Google Scholar

7. Važić B, Rogić B, Drinić M, Savić N: Morphometric similarities and differences between tree genotype of pramenka sheep from central Bosnia. Biotechnol Anim Husb 2017, 33: 291-298.10.2298/BAH1703291VSearch in Google Scholar

8. AWIN welfare assessment protocol for sheep. DOI: 10.13130/AWIN_SHEEP_2015Search in Google Scholar

9. Pulina G, Bencini R: Dairy Sheep Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 2004, 222.10.1079/9780851996813.0000Search in Google Scholar

10. Everett-Hincks JM, Blair HT, Stafford KJ, Lopez-Villalobos N, Kenyon PR, Morris ST: The effect of pasture allowance during pregnancy on maternal behavior and lamb rearing performance in highly fecund ewes. Livest Prod Sci 2005 97: 253-266.10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.006Search in Google Scholar

11. Dwyer C: The behaviour of sheep and goats. In: Per Jensen. The Ethology of Domestic Animals, 3rd edition: an Introductory Text, CABI Publishing, United Kingdom; 2017, 199-214.10.1079/9781786391650.0199Search in Google Scholar

12. Munoz CA, Campbell AJD, Hemsworth PH, Doyle RE: Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep. PLoS One 2019, 14(6): e0218603.10.1371/journal.pone.0218603658396931216326Search in Google Scholar

13. Verbeek E, Oliver MH, Waas JR, McLeay LM, Blache D, Matthews LR: Reduced cortisol and metabolic responses of thin ewes to an acute cold challenge in mid-pregnancy: implications for animal physiology and welfare. PLoS One 2012, 7: e37315.10.1371/journal.pone.0037315Search in Google Scholar

14. Caldeira RM, Belo AT, Santos CC, Vazques MI, Portugal A V: The effect of body condition score on blood metabolites and hormonal profiles in ewes hormonal profiles in ewes. Small Rumin Res 2007, 68: 233–241.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.027Search in Google Scholar

15. Morgan-Davies C, Waterhouse A, Pollock ML, and Milner JM: Body condition score as indicator of ewe survival under extensive conditions. Anim Welf 2008, 17: 71-77.10.1017/S0962728600032000Search in Google Scholar

16. Mutinati M, Piccinno M, Roncetti M, Campanile D, Rizzo A, Sciorsci RL: Oxidative stress during pregnancy in the sheep. Review article. Reprod Domest Anim 2013, 48:353–357.10.1111/rda.12141Search in Google Scholar

17. McGregor BA: Incisor development, wear and loss in sheep and their impacton ewe production, longevity and economics: A review. Small Rumin 2011, 95: 79–87.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.012Search in Google Scholar

18. Waterhouse A: Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive systems – A European perspective. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1996, 49: 29-4010.1016/0168-1591(95)00665-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Færevik G, Andersen IL, Bøe KE: Preferences of sheep for different types of pen flooring. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005, 90: 265–276.10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.010Search in Google Scholar

20. Vučinić M: Ponašanje, dobrobit i zaštita životinja VKS, Beograd, 2004, 388.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hosie BD: Infectious Keratoconjunctivitis. Aitken ID, ed. Diseases of Sheep: Blackwell Publishing; 2007, 342–345.Search in Google Scholar

22. Schreiner D, Ruegg PL: Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86: 3460–3465.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2Search in Google Scholar

23. Winter AC: Lameness in sheep. Small Rumin Res 2008, 76: 149–153.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.12.008Search in Google Scholar

24. Fitzpatrick J, Scott M, Nolan A: Assessment of pain and welfare in sheep. Small Rumin Res 2006, 62: 55–61.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.028Search in Google Scholar

25. Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB: The Welfare of Sheep, in: Dwyer, C.M. (Ed.): The Welfare of Sheep. Springer Science and Business Media BV; 2008, 1–40.10.1007/978-1-4020-8553-6_1Search in Google Scholar

26. Goddard P: Welfare assessment in sheep In Practice 2011, 33: 508-516.10.1136/inp.d7316Search in Google Scholar

27. Fragkou I, Boscos CM, Fthenakis GC: Diagnosis of clinical or subclinical mastitis in ewes. Small Rumin Res 2014; 118: 86–92.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.12.015Search in Google Scholar

28. Law on Animal Husbandry in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“Sl. novine FBiH”, 66, 28 Avgust 2013)Search in Google Scholar

29. Hemsworth P: Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003, 81: 185–198.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0Search in Google Scholar

30. Boivin X, Lensink J, Tallet C, Veissier I: Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Anim Welf 2003, 12: 479–492.10.1017/S0962728600026075Search in Google Scholar

31. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ: Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1994, 39, 349–362.10.1016/0168-1591(94)90168-6Search in Google Scholar

32. Boissy A, Bouissou M: Assessment of individual differences in behavioural reactions of heifers exposed to various fear-eliciting situations. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995, 46: 17–31.10.1016/0168-1591(95)00633-8Search in Google Scholar

33. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M, Janczak A, Visser E, Jones R: Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101: 185–242.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001Search in Google Scholar