Histological and Histochemical Properties of M. Semitendinosus in German Landrace Pigs at Birth and Market Weight/Histološke I Histohemijske Osobine M. Semitendinosus-A Svinja Rase Nemački Landras Na Rođenju I Na Završetku Tova

1. Te Paas MFW, Everts ME, Haagsman HP: Muscle Development of Livestock Animals. Physiology, Genetics and Meat Quality. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: CABI Publishing, Wallingford 2004, 2-38.Search in Google Scholar

2. Brameld J, Zoe T, Daniel R: In utero effects on livestock muscle development and body composition, Aust J Exp Agr 2008, 48:921-929.10.1071/EA08017Search in Google Scholar

3. Wigmore PM, Stickland NC: Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses, J Anat 1983, 137:235-245.Search in Google Scholar

4. Rehfeldt C, Fiedler I, Dietl G, Ender K: Myogenesis and postnatal skeletal muscle cell growth as infl uenced by selection, Livest Prod Sci 2000, 66:177-188.10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00225-6Search in Google Scholar

5. Rehfeldt C, Henning M, Fiedler I: Consequences of pig domestication for skeletal muscle growth and cellularity, Livest Sci 2008, 116:30-41.10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.017Search in Google Scholar

6. Berard J, Kalbe C, Losel D, Tuchscherer A, Rehfeldt C: Potential sources of early-postnatal increase in myofi bre number in pig skeletal muscle, Histochem Cell Biol 2011,136:217-225.10.1007/s00418-011-0833-zSearch in Google Scholar

7. Dokmanović M, Baltić Ž M, Marković R, Bošković M, Lončina J, Glamočlija N, Đorđević M: Relationships among pre-slaughter stress, rigor mortis, blood lactate, and meat and carcass quality inpigs, Acta Veterinaria (Beograd) 2014, 64 (1), 124-137.10.2478/acve-2014-0013Search in Google Scholar

8. Romeis B: Mikroskopische Technik. P. BÖCK (Ed.), Urban & Schwarzenberg (696pp), München 1989, 110-120.Search in Google Scholar

9. Guth L, Samaha FJ: Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase, Exp Neurol 1970, 28:365-367.10.1016/0014-4886(70)90244-XSearch in Google Scholar

10. Novikoff AB, Shin W, Drucker J: Mitochondrial localization of oxidative enzymes staining results with two tetrazolium salts, J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1961, 9:47-61.10.1083/jcb.9.1.47222497113729759Search in Google Scholar

11. Stickland NC, Handel SE: The number and types of muscle fi bers in large and small breeds of pigs, J Anat1986, 147:181-189.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rehfeldt C, Kuhn G: Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis, J Anim Sci 2006, 84:113-124.10.2527/2006.8413_supplE113x16582082Search in Google Scholar

13. Rehfeldt C, Adamovic I, Kuhn G: Effects of dietary supplementation of pregnant sows on carcass and meat quality and skeletal muscle cellularity of the progeny, Meat Sci 2007, 75:103-111.10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.02822063417Search in Google Scholar

14. Dwyer CM, Fletcher JM, Stickland NC: Muscle cellularity and postnatal growth in the pig, J Anim Sci 1993, 71:3339-3343.10.2527/1993.71123339x8294285Search in Google Scholar

15. Dwyer CM, Stickland NC, Fletcher JM: The infl uence of maternal nutrition on muscle fi bre number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth, J Anim Sci 1994, 72:911-918.10.2527/1994.724911x8014156Search in Google Scholar

16. Nissen PM, Danielsen VO, Jorgensen PF, Oksbjerg N: Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no benefi cial effects on muscle fi ber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring, J Anim Sci 2003, 81:67-76.10.2527/2003.81123018x14677857Search in Google Scholar

17. Bee G: Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and gender of progeny on muscle fi ber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:826-836.10.2527/2004.823826x15032440Search in Google Scholar

18. Velotto S, Vitale C, Stassi T, Crasto A: New Insights into Muscle Fibre Types in Casertana Pig, Acta Vet Brno 2010, 79:169-176. 10.2754/avb201079020169Search in Google Scholar