Comparative study of effective-site target controlled infusion with standard bolus induction of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion

1. Brain AIJ. The laryngeal mask-a new concept in airway management. Br J Anesth. 1983; 55: 801-5.10.1093/bja/55.8.8016349667Search in Google Scholar

2. Brodrick PM, Webster NR, Nunn JF. The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44:238-41.10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11233.x2650575Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Smith I, White PF. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to a face mask during outpatient arthroscopy. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 850-5.10.1097/00000542-199211000-000031443736Search in Google Scholar

4. Braude N, Clements EAF, Hodges UM, Andrews BP. The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44:551-4.10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11439.x2672867Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Brimacombe J.The advantage of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 1995; 42:1017-23.10.1007/BF030110758590490Search in Google Scholar

6. Brain AIJ. The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Instruction Manual. Henley:Intavent Research, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

7. Coates DP, Monk CR, Prys Roberts C, Turtle M. Hemodynamic effects of infusions of the emulsion formulation of propofol during nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987; 66: 64-70.10.1213/00000539-198701000-00011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Schwilden H. A general method for calculating the dosage scheme in linear pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 20:379-86.10.1007/BF006154097286049Search in Google Scholar

9. Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorhithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992; 20:147-69. 10.1007/BF010709991629794Search in Google Scholar

10. Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology.1999; 90:1502-16.10.1097/00000542-199906000-0000310360845Search in Google Scholar

11. Struys MMRF, De Smet T, Depoorter B, Versichelen LFM, Mortier EP, Dumortier FJE, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target comtrolled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92:399-406.10.1097/00000542-200002000-0002110691226Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Wakeling HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, Glass PSA. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration for propofol. Anesthesiology. 1999; 90: 92-7.10.1097/00000542-199901000-00014Search in Google Scholar

13. Taylor N, Kenny GNC. Requirements for targetcontrolled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53:222-6.10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00316.xSearch in Google Scholar

14. Kodaka M, Handa F, Kawasaki J, Miyao H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:956-9.10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02821.x12358953Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Baik HJ, Kim JH, Lee CH. Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. J Clin Anesth. 2001; 13:175-81.10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00237-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Matta BF, Marsh DS, Nevin M. Laryngeal mask airwaya more successful method of insertion. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7:132-5.10.1016/0952-8180(94)00027-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Somboonvibul W, Lelanukrom R, Sriprachittichai P. The laryngeal mask airway in pediatric anesthesia. Thai J Anesthesiol. 1995; 21: 64-9.Search in Google Scholar

18. Schwilden H. A general method for calculating the dosage scheme in linear pharmacokinetics, Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 20: 379.10.1007/BF006154097286049Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 67: 41-8.10.1093/bja/67.1.411859758Search in Google Scholar

20. Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Arimura S, Nitahara K, Satoh T. Oral clonidine premedication reduces the EC50 of propofol concentration for laryngeal mask airway insertion in male patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002; 46: 372-7.10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460407.x11952435Search in Google Scholar

21. Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Cedrati V, Veglia F, Torri G. The target plasma concentration of propofol required to place laryngeal mask versus cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88: 917-20.10.1213/00000539-199904000-00043Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Kodaka M, Handa F, Kawasaki J, Miyao H. Cp50 of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using predicted concentrations with and without nitrous oxide. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:956-9.10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02821.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Brimacombe J. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition. New York:Saunders, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

24. Ludbrook GL, Upton RN. A physiological model of induction of anaesthesia with propofol in sheep. 2. Model analysis and implications for dose requirements. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 79: 505-13.10.1093/bja/79.4.5059389271Search in Google Scholar