[
Acik, N. (2013). Reducing the participation gap in civic engagement: Political consumerism in Europe. European Sociological Review, 29(6), 1309-1322. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct01610.1093/esr/jct016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, perspective, commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631452712810.1177/0149206314527128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bates, S. (2012, March). The social innovation imperative. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/papers/entry/the_social_innovation_imperative
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blazevic, V., & Lievens, A. (2008). Managing innovation through customer coproduced knowledge in electronic services: An exploratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0064-y10.1007/s11747-007-0064-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation – where we’ve been and where we’re going. Research Technology Management, 55(4), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X550408510.5437/08956308X5504085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1145/1924421.192444210.1145/1924421.1924442
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estensoro, M. (2015). How can social innovation be facilitated? Experiences from an action research process in a local network. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 28(6), 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9347-210.1007/s11213-015-9347-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.000110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foote Whyte, W. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research (Sage Focus Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978141298538310.4135/9781412985383
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilman, H. R. (2016). Participatory budgeting and civic tech: The revival of citizen engagement. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grimm, R., Fox, Ch., Baines, S., & Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation. The European Journal of Social Sciences, 26(4), 436-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.84816310.1080/13511610.2013.848163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howaldt, J., Kopp, R., & Schwarz, M. (2015). On the theory of social innovations: Tarde’s neglected contribution to the development of a sociological innovation theory. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Retrieved from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/41963/ssoar-2015-howaldt_et_al-On_the_theory_of_social.pdf?sequence=1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010, January-February). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.00310.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łabędź, K. (2016). Aktywność obywatelska na poziomie lokalnym i jej determinanty (na przykładzie Krakowa). [Civic engagement at the local level and its determinants (the example of Krakow)]. Polityka i Społeczeństwo. Studies in Politics and Society, 4(14), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.15584/polispol.2016.4.210.15584/polispol.2016.4.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mulgan, G. (with Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B.). (2007). Social innovation – what is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Young Foundation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: Nesta.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010, January). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.00110.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olejniczuk-Merta, A. (2015). Social innovations in the process of system products development. Journal of Economics and Management, 22(4), 5-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peter-Bombik, K., & Szczudlińska-Kanoś, A. (2015). Participatory management in local communities, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics, 391, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.15611/PN.2015.391.0810.15611/pn.2015.391.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phills, J. A. Jr., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008, Fall). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 82-115. http://doi.org/10.1177/104225871772771810.1177/1042258717727718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631879319610.1177/0149206318793196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sankowska, A. (2016). Trust, knowledge creation and mediating effects of knowledge transfer processes. Journal of Economics and Management, 23(1), 33-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobol, A. (2015). Governance and citizens’ engagement in terms of local sustainable development. Journal of Economics and Management, 19(1), 63-76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business. New York: Anchor Books. Retrieved from http://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/TheWisdomOfCrowds-JamesSurowiecki.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szewczuk-Stępień, M., Adamska, M., & Klemens, B. (2017). Strategie oddziaływania na interesariuszy rozwoju lokalnego kierowanego przez społeczność [Strategies of impact on stakeholders of local community development leads by the citizens]. In H. Brandenburg & P. Sekuła (Eds.), Projekty lokalne i regionalne – interesariusze projektu [Stakeholders of local and regional projects] (pp. 340-353). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (5th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomlinson, Ph. R. (2010). Cooperative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, 39(6), 762-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.01010.1016/j.respol.2010.02.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000, January-February). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139-145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Western Australia Police. (2015). Case study. Retrieved from https://ideascale.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/WAPOL2.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar