[Barclay, Pat and Stephen Benard (2013). “Who Cries Wolf and When? Manipulation of Perceived Threats to Preserve Rank in Cooperative Groups.” PLOS 8, 9: 1-13.10.1371/journal.pone.0073863]Search in Google Scholar
[Barfield, Thomas J. (1989). The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, 221 BC to AD 1757. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Benard, Stephen (2012). “Cohesion from Conflict: Does Intergroup Conflict Motivate Intragroup Norm Enforcement and Support for Centralized Leadership?” Social Psychology Quarterly 75, 2: 107-30.10.1177/0190272512442397]Search in Google Scholar
[Benard, Stephen and Long Doan (2011). “The Conflict-Cohesion Hypothesis: Past, Present and Possible Futures.” Advances in Group Processes 28: 189-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bornstein, Gary (2003). “Intergroup Conflict: Individual, Group and Collective Interests.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 7, 2: 129-45.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_129-145]Search in Google Scholar
[Bornstein, G, I. Erev and O. Rosen (1990). “Intergroup Competition as a Structural Solution to Social Dilemmas.” Social Behavior 5: 247-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bornstein, G., U. Gneezy and R. Nagel (2002). “The Effect of Intergroup Competition on Intragroup Coordination: An Experimental Study.” Games and Economic Behavior 4: 1-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carneiro, Robert L. (1970). “A Theory of the Origin of the State.” Science 169: 733-738.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carneiro, Robert L. (1991). “The Nature of the Chiefdom as Revealed by Evidence from the Cauca Valley of Columbia.” In A. P. Rambo and K. Gillogly (eds.) Profiles in Cultural Evolution. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 167-190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carneiro, Robert L. (2012). “The Circumscription Theory: A Clarification, Amplification and Reformulation.” Social Evolution and History 11, 2: 5-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chacon, Yami, David Willer, Pamela Emanuelson and Richard Chacon (2015). “From Chiefdom to State: The Contribution of Social Structural Dynamics.” Social Evolution and History 14, 2 (forthcoming).]Search in Google Scholar
[Corra, Mamadi (2005). “Separation and Exclusion: Distinctly Modern Conditions of Power?” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 30, 1: 41-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkstra, Jacob and Marcel van Assen (2008). “The Comparison of Four Types of Everyday Interdependencies: Externalities in Exchange Networks.” Rationality and Society 20: 115-143.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elder, R. (2004). Indirect Coercion: Influencing Third Parties to Achieve US National Security Objectives. Maxwell AFB, AL: School of Advanced Air and Space Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fehr, Ernst and Urs Fischbacher (2004). “Third Party Punishment and Social Norms.” Evolution and Human Behavior 25: 63-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gambetta, Diego (1993). The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gavrilets, Sergey and Laura Fortunato (2014). “A Solution to the Collective Action Problem in Between- Group Conflict and Within-Group Inequality.” Nature Communications 26: 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goody, Jack (1983). The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607752]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, Jonathan (1982). The Evolution of the Prehistoric State. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.10.7312/haas91066]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayden, Brian and Suzanne Villeneuve (2012). “Who Benefits from Complexity? A View from Futuna.” In T. Douglas Price and Gary Feinman (eds.) Pathways to Power. New York: Springer, 95-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch and R. Thaler (1986). “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking.” American Economic Review 76: 728-741.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keeley, Lawrence H. (1996). War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirch, Patrick V. (1997). “Chiefship and Competitive Involution: The Marquesas Island of Eastern Polynesia.” In Timothy Earle (ed.) Chiefdoms, Power, Economy and Ideology, New York: Cambridge University Press, 119-145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirch, Patrick V. (2010). How Chiefs Became Kings. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520947849]Search in Google Scholar
[LeBlanc, Steven A. (2003). Constant Battles: The Myth of the Peaceful, Noble Savage. New York: St. Martin’s Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luce, Robert Duncan and Howard Raiffa (1957). Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lupo, Salvatore (2009). History of the Mafia. New York: Columbia University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marx, Karl ([1867] 1967). Capital. New York: International Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pileggi, Nicholas (1986). Wiseguy. New York: Pocket Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popov, Dusko (1974). Spy/Counterspy: The Autobiography of Dusko Popov. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.]Search in Google Scholar
[Puurtinen, Mikael and Tapio Mappes (2009). “Between-Group Competition and Human Cooperation.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 276: 355-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Redmond, Elsa (1998). Chiefdoms and Chieftaincy. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, Bertrand (2003). Power. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simmel, Georg. ([1908] 1955). Conflict & the Web of Group-Affiliations. New York: The Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stark, Rodney and William Sims Bainbridge (1987). A Theory of Religion. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turillo, C. J., R. Folger, J. J. Lavelle, E. E. Umphress, J. O. Gee (2002). “Is Virtue its Own Reward: Self- Sacrificial Decisions for the Sake of Fairness.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89: 839-865.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Vugt, Mark, Robert Hogan and Robert Kaiser (2008). “Leadership, Followership and Evolution.” American Psychologist 63, 3: 182-96.10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182]Search in Google Scholar
[Vidal, Gore (1998). The American Presidency. Chicago: Odonian Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, Henry A. and Morris Zelditch, Jr. (1993). “Power, Legitimation, and the Stability of Authority: A Theoretical Research Program.” In Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch, Jr., (eds.) Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 364-381.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, Max ([1896] 1976). “The Social Causes of the Decay of Ancient Civilization.” In Russell Kahl (ed.), Studies in Explanation (tr. R. Frank). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, Max ([1922] 1963). Sociology of Religion (tr. Ephraim Fischoff). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David (1984). “Analysis and Composition as Theoretic Procedures.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10: 241-270.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David (1987). Theory and the Experimental Investigation of Social Structures. New York: Gordon & Breach.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David (1999). Network Exchange Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David, Michael J. Lovaglia and Barry Markovsky (1997). “Power and Influence: A Theoretical Bridge.” Social Forces 76, 2: 571-603.10.2307/2580725]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David, Brent Simpson, Jacek Szmatka and Joanna Mazur (1996). “Social Theory and Historical Explanation.” Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 22: 63-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, Robb (2004). “The Effects of Government-Issued Terror Warnings on Presidential Approval Ratings.” Current Research in Social Psychology 10: 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zelditch, M. (2001). “Theories of Legitimacy.” In John Jost and Brenda Major (eds.) The Psychology of Legitimacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
