Acceso abierto

Effect of seed-applied fluopyram on Meloidogyne incognita infection and maturity in cotton and soybean

Tracy Hawk
Tracy Hawk
 y 
Travis R. Faske
Travis R. Faske
   | 25 ago 2020
Journal of Nematology's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Publicado en línea: 25 ago 2020
Páginas: 1 - 7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-083
Palabras clave
© 2020 Tracy Hawk et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Various life stages of Meloidogyne incognita stained with acid fuchsin. Life stages include vermiform second-stage juvenille (J2), sausage-shaped juvenile, pear-shaped female, and gravid (eggs present) female.
Various life stages of Meloidogyne incognita stained with acid fuchsin. Life stages include vermiform second-stage juvenille (J2), sausage-shaped juvenile, pear-shaped female, and gravid (eggs present) female.

Figure 2:

Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita at three sample times by seed-applied nematicides in cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita at three sample times by seed-applied nematicides in cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 3:

Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita root galling by seed-applied nematicides at three sample times on cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita root galling by seed-applied nematicides at three sample times on cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 4:

Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton (A) and soybean (B) in response to seed-applied nematicides. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton (A) and soybean (B) in response to seed-applied nematicides. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test.

Figure 5:

Post-infection maturity of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton (A) and soybean (B) in response to seed-applied nematicides. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to chi-square analysis applied in pairs of treatments within each sample time.
Post-infection maturity of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton (A) and soybean (B) in response to seed-applied nematicides. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at α = 0.05 according to chi-square analysis applied in pairs of treatments within each sample time.

Figure 6:

Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita root penetration at three inoculation depths by seed-applied nematicides in cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test at α = 0.05.
Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita root penetration at three inoculation depths by seed-applied nematicides in cotton (A) and soybean (B). Different letters above bars indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test at α = 0.05.
eISSN:
2640-396X
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
Volume Open
Temas de la revista:
Life Sciences, other
RSS Feed de revista