Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Journal of Nematology
Volumen 52 (2020): Edición 1 (January 2020)
Acceso abierto
Root-knot nematodes demonstrate temporal variation in host penetration
Shova Mishra
Shova Mishra
y
Peter DiGennaro
Peter DiGennaro
| 13 abr 2020
Journal of Nematology
Volumen 52 (2020): Edición 1 (January 2020)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Publicado en línea:
13 abr 2020
Páginas:
1 - 8
Recibido:
07 feb 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2020-037
Palabras clave
Root-knot nematodes
,
Temporal variation
,
Circadian rhythms
,
Bioassays
,
Nematode biology
© 2020 Shova Mishra et al., published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:
Host plants, Medicago truncatula were inoculated with RKN at six different time points; three times points during the light period and three time points in the dark period. In total, 24 hr post-inoculation, root samples were collected at respective time points to check the temporal variation in penetration. All infective juveniles were exposed to host roots for a 24 hr period before quantification.
Figure 2:
Sampling timepoints for normal (A) and inverted (B) light/dark cycles. To exclude the direct effect of light as a contributing factor to diurnal changes in penetration, we inverted light/dark cycles for equal period of light and dark as in normal condition. Inoculation was done at 2 hr interval for three time points at dark and three time points at light under both conditions. Root samples were collected at 24 hr post-inoculation at respective time points.
Figure 3:
RKN displays temporal variation in penetration with the highest penetration at night, 3:00 a.m. M. truncatula was inoculated with M incognita (A) and M. hapla (B) at six time points, three times points light and three timepoints dark. In total, 24-hr post-inoculation root samples were collected at respective time points. Bars represent standard error and columns with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Data shown in each figure represent three independent experiments with four replications per experiment.
Figure 4:
M. truncatula plants maintained under normal 16 hr day/8 hr night conditions were inoculated with M. incognita at six time points. One set of plants was kept in normal light condition (A) and another set of plants were immediately transferred to an inverted light condition (B). In total, 24 hr post-inoculation root samples were collected at respective time points and nematode inside root was quantified. Bars represent standard error and columns with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Data shown in each figure are from three experiments with five replications per experiment.
Figure 5:
RKN do not exhibit temporal difference in penetration when plants are entrained under constant light conditions. Three weeks old M. truncatula plants were kept in constant light for one week. Plants were inoculated with M. incognita at six time points. In total, 24 hr post-inoculation root samples were collected at respective time points and nematode inside root was counted. Bars represent standard error. No timepoint was significantly different (p > 0.05). Data shown in each figure are from two experiments with four replications in each experiment.
Figure 6:
Percent egg hatch is not influenced by light and do not show temporal differences at different time points. Freshly harvested RKN eggs were observed for hatching over a period of 68 hr. Hatched juveniles were counted, and percent hatch was calculated. To examine influence of light we compared percent egg hatch between constant light and constant dark timepoints and to assess any temporal differences, percent egg hatch between consecutive time points under constant dark and constant light were measured. Bars represent standard error and means (n =12) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) according to paired t-test.
Figure 7:
Light does not have influence on RKN juvenile mobility; 300 freshly hatched J2 were placed in a modified Baermann funnel under constant light or constant dark conditions. After 4 hr, the number of J2 that passed through sieve were counted. Bars represent standard error and means (n =12) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) according to paired t-test.
Vista previa