[
Ajwa, H. A., Trout, T., Mueller, J., Wilhelm, S., Nelson, S. D., Soppe, R., and Shatley, D. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349–1355.10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.134918943892
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous. 1992. Methyl bromide: Its atmospheric science, technology and economics. Synthesis report. Methyl bromide interim scientific and technology and economic assessment. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous. 2000. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phaseout. An economic research service report. Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 756. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aib756/aib756.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anonymous. 2002. Chemical methods of nematode management. http://plpnemweb.ucdavis.edu/nemaplex/Mangmnt/Chemical.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arling, J. 2015. Methyl bromide and the Montreal Protocol. Proceedings of 2015 Annual International Research Conference on Methyl bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. https://mbao.org/static/docs/confs/2015-sandiego/papers/arling.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boesten, J. J., Van der Pas, L. J., Smelt, J. H., and Leistra, M. 1991. Transformation rate of methylisothiocyanate and 1,3-dichloro-propene in water-saturated sandy subsoils. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 39:179–190.10.18174/njas.v39i3.16540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, A. L., and Supkoff, D. M. 1994. Options to methyl bromide for the control of soil-borne diseases and pests in California with reference to the Netherlands. Pest management analysis and planning program, 24 pp. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/dprdocs/methbrom/alt-anal/soilsol.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cabrera, J. A., Wang, D., Gerik, J. S., and Gan, J. 2014. Spot drip application of dimethyl disulfide as a post-plant treatment for the control of plant parasitic nematodes and soilborne pathogens in grape production. Pest Management Science 70:1151– 1157.10.1002/ps.366624307137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Candole, B. L., Csinos, A. S., and Wang, D. 2007. Concentrations in soil and efficacy of drip-applied 1,3-D+chloropicrin and metam sodium in plastic-mulched sandy soil beds. Crop Protection 26:1801– 1809.10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csinos, A. S., Laska, J. E., and Childers, S. 2002. Dye injection for predicting pesticide movement in micro-irrigated polyethylene film mulch beds. Pest Management Science 58:381–384.10.1002/ps.46511975186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desaeger, J. A. J., Eger, J. E., Csinos, A. S., Gilreath, J. P., Olson, S. M., and Webster, T. M. 2004. Movement and biological activity of drip-applied 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin in raised mulched beds in the southeastern USA. Pest Management Science 60:1220–1230.10.1002/ps.95015578603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desaeger, J., and Csinos, A. 2006. Root-knot nematode management in double crop plasticulture vegetables. Journal of Nematology 38:59–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickson, D. W., and Hewlett, T. E. 1988. Efficacy of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for control of Meloidogyne arenaria on peanut. Annals of Applied Nematology (Journal of Nematology vol. 20, Supplement) 2:95–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickson, D. W., Locascio, S. J., and Mitchell, D. J. 1999. Evaluating methyl bromide alternative fumigants on tomato under polyethylene mulch in Florida. http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/np/mba/jan99/altfum.htm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eger, J. E., Gilreath, J. P., and Noling, J. P. 200. Effect of irrigation times on wetting patterns in Florida vegetable soils. Annual International Research. Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, CA, Abstr. 48. http://mbao.org.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerstl, Z., Milgelgrin, U., Krikun, J., and Yaron, B. 1977. Behavior and effectiveness of vapam applied to soil in irrigation water. Pp. 42– 50 in Behavior of pesticides in soil. M. Horowitz, ed. Proceedings of the Israel-France Symposium, 1975. Agricultural Research Organization. Bet Dagam, Israel: Special Publication 82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilreath, J. P., and Santos, B. M. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives for weed and soilborne disease management in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Crop Protection 23:1193–1198.10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilreath, J. P., Santos, B. M., Gilreath, P. R., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 2004a. Efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin application methods in combination with pebulate and napropamide in tomato. Crop Protection 23:1187–1191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilreath, J. P., Noling, J. W., and Santos, B. M. 2004b. Methyl bromide alternatives for pepper (Capsicum annuum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) rotations. Crop Protection 23:347–351.10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilreath, J. P., Santos, B. M., Gilreath, P. R., and Noling, J. W. 2005. Validation of 1,3-dichloropropene plus chloropicrin broadcast application in tomato grower fields. Journal of Vegetable Science 11:133–139.10.1300/J484v11n01_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilreath, J. P., and Santos, B. M. 2008. Managing weeds and nematodes with combinations of methyl bromide alternatives in tomato. Crop Protection 27:648–652.10.1016/j.cropro.2007.09.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goring, C. A. I. 1967. Physical aspects of soil in relation to the action of fungicides. Annual Review of Phytopathology 5:285–318.10.1146/annurev.py.05.090167.001441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holbrook, C. C., Knauft, D. A., and Dickson, D. W. 1983. A technique for screening peanut for resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria. Plant Disease 57:957–958.10.1094/PD-67-957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingham, R. E., Hamm, P. B., Williams, R. E., and Swanson, W. H. 2000. Control of Paratrichodorus allius and corky ringspot disease of potato in the Columbia Basin of Oregon. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology 32:566–575.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lamberti, F. 2000. 1,3-D, a valid alternative to methyl bromide for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/airc/2000/45lamberti.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leocata, S., Pirruccio, G., Medico, E., Myrta, A., and Greco, N. 2014. Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS): A new soil fumigant to control root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., in Protected crops in Sicily, Italy. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1044:415–420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., Dickson, D. W., Kucharek, T. A., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. HortScience 32:1208–1211.10.21273/HORTSCI.32.7.1208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Locascio, S. J., and Dickson, D. W. 1998. Metam sodium combined with chloropicrin as an alternative to methyl bromide. http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/airc/1998/028locascio.pdf.10.21273/HORTSCI.33.3.525b
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGovern, R. J., Vavrina, C. S., Noling, J., Datnoff, L. A., and Yonce, H. D. 1998. Evaluation of application methods of metham sodium for management of fusarium crown and root rot in tomato in southwest Florida. Plant Disease 82:919–923.10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.8.91930856922
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Munnecke, D. E., and Van Gundy, S. D. 1979. Movement of fumigants in soil, dosage responses, and differential effects. Annual Review of Phytopathology 17:405–429.10.1146/annurev.py.17.090179.00220118393685
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neher, D. 200. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. Journal of Nematology 33:161–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelson, S. D., Dickson, D. W., Ajwa, H. A., and Sullivan, D. A. 2004. Efficacy of metam sodium under drip and surface spray application in Florida tomato production. Subtropical Plant Science 56:16–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noling, J. W., and Becker, J. O. 1994. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology 26:573–586.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noling, J. W., Botts, D. A., and MacRae, A. W. 2010. Chapter 43: Alternatives to methyl bromide soil fumigation for florida fruit and vegetable production. Pp. 301–316 in S. M. Olson and E. H. Simonne, eds. Vegetable Production Handbook for Florida. University of Florida, SP170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ou, L., Thomas, J. E., Allen, L. H., Jr., Vu, J. C., and Dickson, D. W. 2006. Effects of application methods of metam sodium and plastic covers on horizontal and vertical distributions of methyl iso-thiocyanate in bedded field plots. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 51:164–173.10.1007/s00244-005-0185-616583255
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Overman, A. J., and Jones, J. P. 1984. Soil fumigants for control of nematodes, fusarium wilt and fusarium crown rot on tomato. Proceeding of the Florida State Horticultural Society 97:194–197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Overman, A. J., and Jones, J. P. 1986. Soil solarization, reaction and fumigation effects on double-cropped tomato under full-bed mulch. Proceeding of the Florida State Horticultural Society 99:315–318.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rich, J. R., Olson, S. M., and Noling, J. W. 2003. Management of root-knot nematodes and nutsedge with fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide in north Florida U.S.A. tomato production. Nematologia Mediterranea 31:163–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, P. A., Magyarosy, A. C., Matthews, W. C., and May, D. M. 1988. Effects of metam-sodium applied by drip irrigation on root-knot nematodes, Pythium ultimum and Fusarium sp. in soil and on carrot and tomato roots. Plant Disease 72:213–217.10.1094/PD-72-0213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosskopf, E. N., Church, G., Holzinger, J., Yandoc-Ables, C., and Noling, J. 2006. Efficacy of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) for management of nematodes and fungal plant pathogens. Phytopathology 96: S100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruzo, L. O. 2006. Physical, chemical and environmental properties of selected chemical alternatives for the pre-plant use of methyl bromide as soil fumigant. Pest Management Science 62:99–113.10.1002/ps.113516308867
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, B. M., Gilreath, J. P., Motis, T. N., Noling, J. W., Jones, J. P., and Norton, J. A. 2006a. Comparing methyl bromide alternatives for soilborne disease, nematode and weed management in fresh market tomato. Crop Protection 25:690–695.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, B. M., Gilreath, J. P., Motis, T. N., von Hulten, M., and Siham, M. N. 2006b. Effects of mulch types and concentrations of 1,3-dichloropropene plus chloropicrin on fumigant retention and nutsedge control. HortTechnology 16:637–640.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, S. M., Ajwa, H. A., Trout, T. J., and Gao, S. 2008. Nematode control from shank-and-drip-applied fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide. HortScience 43(6):1826–1832.10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smelt, J. H., and Leistra, M. 1974. Conversion of metham-sodium to methyl isothiocyanate and basic data on the behaviour of methyl isothiocyanate. Pesticide Science 5:401–407.10.1002/ps.2780050405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zasada, I. A., Halbrendt, J. M., Kokalis-Burelle, N., LaMondia, J., McKenry, M. V., and Noling, J. W. 2010. Managing nematodes without methyl bromide. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48:311–328.10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-11442520455696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeck, W. M. 1971. A rating scheme for field evaluation of root-knot nematode infestation. Pflanzenschutz Nachrichten Bayer 24:141–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
