Westhoff CM. The Rh blood group system in review: a new face for the next decade. Transfusion 2004;44:1663–73.WesthoffCM.The Rh blood group system in review: a new face for the next decade.2004;44:1663–73.10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.04237.x15504174Search in Google Scholar
Flegel WA. Molecular genetics and clinical applications for RH. Transfus Apher Sci 2011;44:81–91.FlegelWA.Molecular genetics and clinical applications for RH.2011;44:81–91.10.1016/j.transci.2010.12.013304251121277262Search in Google Scholar
Wagner FF, Flegel WA. The rhesus site. Transfus Med Hemother 2014;41:357–63.WagnerFFFlegelWA.The rhesus site.2014;41:357–63.10.1159/000366176426449225538538Search in Google Scholar
Westhoff CM. Rh complexities: serology and DNA genotyping. Transfusion 2007;47:17S–22S.WesthoffCM.Rh complexities: serology and DNA genotyping.2007;47:17S–22S.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01305.x17593281Search in Google Scholar
Wagner FF, Gassner C, Muller TH, Schonitzer D, Schunter F, Flegel WA. Molecular basis of weak D phenotypes. Blood 1999; 93:385–93.WagnerFFGassnerCMullerTHSchonitzerDSchunterFFlegelWA.Molecular basis of weak D phenotypes.1999;93:385–93.10.1182/blood.V93.1.385Search in Google Scholar
Sandler SG, Chen LN, Flegel WA. Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype. Br J Haematol 2017;179:10–9.SandlerSGChenLNFlegelWA.Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.2017;179:10–9.10.1111/bjh.14757561284728508413Search in Google Scholar
Muller TH, Wagner FF, Trockenbacher A, et al. PCR screening for common weak D types shows different distributions in three Central European populations. Transfusion 2001;41: 45–52.MullerTHWagnerFFTrockenbacherA,PCR screening for common weak D types shows different distributions in three Central European populations.2001;41:45–52.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41010045.x11161244Search in Google Scholar
Reid ME, Halter Hipsky C, Hue-Roye K, Hoppe C. Genomic analyses of RH alleles to improve transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2014;52:195–202.ReidMEHalter HipskyCHue-RoyeKHoppeC.Genomic analyses of RH alleles to improve transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease.2014;52:195–202.10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.11.003395444324309423Search in Google Scholar
Wagner FF, Frohmajer A, Ladewig B, et al. Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes. Blood 2000;95:2699–708.WagnerFFFrohmajerALadewigB,Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes.2000;95:2699–708.10.1182/blood.V95.8.2699Search in Google Scholar
Noizat-Pirenne F, Tournamille C. Relevance of RH variants in transfusion of sickle cell patients. Transfus Clin Biol 2011;18:527–35.Noizat-PirenneFTournamilleC.Relevance of RH variants in transfusion of sickle cell patients.2011;18:527–35.10.1016/j.tracli.2011.09.00122024128Search in Google Scholar
Dezan MR, Oliveira VB, Gomes CN, et al. High frequency of variant RHD genotypes among donors and patients of mixed origin with serologic weak-D phenotype. J Clin Lab Anal 2018;32:e22596.DezanMROliveiraVBGomesCN,High frequency of variant RHD genotypes among donors and patients of mixed origin with serologic weak-D phenotype.2018;32:e22596.10.1002/jcla.22596Search in Google Scholar
Costa S, Martin F, Chiba A, Langhi D Jr, Chiattone C, Bordin J. RHD alleles and D antigen density among serologically D–C+ Brazilian blood donors. Transfus Med 2014;24:60–1.CostaSMartinFChibaALanghiDJrChiattoneCBordinJ.RHD alleles and D antigen density among serologically D–C+ Brazilian blood donors.2014;24:60–1.10.1111/tme.12088Search in Google Scholar
Maaskant-van Wijk PA, Faas BH, de Ruijter JA, et al. Genotyping of RHD by multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of six RHD-specific exons. Transfusion 1998;38:1015–21.Maaskant-van WijkPAFaasBHde RuijterJA,Genotyping of RHD by multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of six RHD-specific exons.1998;38:1015–21.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38111299056309.xSearch in Google Scholar
Tax MG, van der Schoot CE, van Doorn R, Douglas-Berger L, van Rhenen DJ, Maaskant-van Wijk PA. RHC and RHc genotyping in different ethnic groups. Transfusion 2002; 42:634–44.TaxMGvan der SchootCEvan DoornRDouglas-BergerLvan RhenenDJMaaskant-van WijkPA.RHC and RHc genotyping in different ethnic groups.2002;42:634–44.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00096.xSearch in Google Scholar
Singleton BK, Green CA, Avent ND, et al. The presence of an RHD pseudogene containing a 37 base pair duplication and a nonsense mutation in Africans with the Rh D-negative blood group phenotype. Blood 2000;95:12–8.SingletonBKGreenCAAventND,The presence of an RHD pseudogene containing a 37 base pair duplication and a nonsense mutation in Africans with the Rh D-negative blood group phenotype.2000;95:12–8.10.1182/blood.V95.1.12Search in Google Scholar
Wagner FF, Gassner C, Muller TH, Schonitzer D, Schunter F, Flegel WA. Three molecular structures cause rhesus D category VI phenotypes with distinct immunohematologic features. Blood 1998;91:2157–68.WagnerFFGassnerCMullerTHSchonitzerDSchunterFFlegelWA.Three molecular structures cause rhesus D category VI phenotypes with distinct immunohematologic features.1998;91:2157–68.10.1182/blood.V91.6.2157Search in Google Scholar
Chiu RW, Murphy MF, Fidler C, Zee BC, Wainscoat JS, Lo YM. Determination of RhD zygosity: comparison of a double amplification refractory mutation system approach and a multiplex real-time quantitative PCR approach. Clin Chem 2001;47:667–72.ChiuRWMurphyMFFidlerCZeeBCWainscoatJSLoYM.Determination of RhD zygosity: comparison of a double amplification refractory mutation system approach and a multiplex real-time quantitative PCR approach.2001;47:667–72.10.1093/clinchem/47.4.667Search in Google Scholar
Perco P, Shao CP, Mayr WR, Panzer S, Legler TJ. Testing for the D zygosity with three different methods revealed altered Rhesus boxes and a new weak D type. Transfusion 2003;43:335–9.PercoPShaoCPMayrWRPanzerSLeglerTJ.Testing for the D zygosity with three different methods revealed altered Rhesus boxes and a new weak D type.2003;43:335–9.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00313.xSearch in Google Scholar
Flegel WA, Curin-Serbec V, Delamaire M, et al. Section 1B: Rh flow cytometry. Coordinator’s report. Rhesus index and antigen density: an analysis of the reproducibility of flow cytometric determination. Transfus Clin Biol 2002;9:33–42.FlegelWACurin-SerbecVDelamaireM,Section 1B: Rh flow cytometry. Coordinator’s report. Rhesus index and antigen density: an analysis of the reproducibility of flow cytometric determination.2002;9:33–42.10.1016/S1246-7820(01)00213-0Search in Google Scholar
Arnoni CP, Latini FR, Muniz JG, et al. A simple approach to screen rare donors in Brazil. Immunohematology 2015;31: 20–3.ArnoniCPLatiniFRMunizJG,A simple approach to screen rare donors in Brazil.2015;31:20–3.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-066Search in Google Scholar
Costa SS, Chiba A, Cruz B, Langhi Júnior D, Bordin JO. RHD*weak D type 38: a family study. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2016;38:79–81.CostaSSChibaACruzBLanghi JúniorDBordinJO.RHD*weak D type 38: a family study.2016;38:79–81.10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.10.001478676326969778Search in Google Scholar
Ansart-Pirenne H, Asso-Bonnet M, Le Pennec PY, Roussel M, Patereau C, Noizat-Pirenne F. RhD variants in Caucasians: consequences for checking clinically relevant alleles. Transfusion 2004;44:1282–6.Ansart-PirenneHAsso-BonnetMLe PennecPYRousselMPatereauCNoizat-PirenneF.RhD variants in Caucasians: consequences for checking clinically relevant alleles.2004;44:1282–6.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04063.x15318849Search in Google Scholar
Dogic V, Bingulac-Popovic J, Babic I, et al. Distribution of weak D types in the Croatian population. Transfus Med 2011;21:278–9.DogicVBingulac-PopovicJBabicI,Distribution of weak D types in the Croatian population.2011;21:278–9.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01071.x21269342Search in Google Scholar
Wagner FF, Frohmajer A, Flegel WA. RHD positive haplotypes in D negative Europeans. BMC Genet 2001;2:10.WagnerFFFrohmajerAFlegelWA.RHD positive haplotypes in D negative Europeans.2001;2:10.10.1186/1471-2156-2-103726711495631Search in Google Scholar
Araujo F, Rodrigues MJ, Monteiro F, et al. Weak D type 2 is the most prevalent weak D type in Portugal. Transfus Med 2006;16:63–7.AraujoFRodriguesMJMonteiroF,Weak D type 2 is the most prevalent weak D type in Portugal.2006;16:63–7.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2005.00638.x16480441Search in Google Scholar
Rodrigues M, Rodrigues F, Tilley L, Poole J, Chabert T, Sousa G. Several new examples of weak D type 38 in the Portuguese population [abstract]. Transfusion 2006;46(Suppl):141A–2.RodriguesMRodriguesFTilleyLPooleJChabertTSousaG.Several new examples of weak D type 38 in the Portuguese population [abstract].2006;46(Suppl) :141A–2.Search in Google Scholar
Ouchari M, Romdhane H, Chakroun T, et al. Weak D in the Tunisian population. Blood Transfus 2015;13:295–301.OuchariMRomdhaneHChakrounT,Weak D in the Tunisian population.2015;13:295–301.Search in Google Scholar
Dinardo CL, Kelly S, Dezan MR, et al. Diversity of RH and transfusion support in Brazilian sickle cell disease patients with unexplained Rh antibodies. Transfusion 2019;59: 3228–35.DinardoCLKellySDezanMR,Diversity of RH and transfusion support in Brazilian sickle cell disease patients with unexplained Rh antibodies.2019;59:3228–35.10.1111/trf.15479678537031408202Search in Google Scholar