Hemolytic transfusion reactions due to anti-e+f detectable only by nonstandard serologic techniques

1.Holland PV, ed. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 13th ed. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

2.Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 9th ed, Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific, 1993:360. 8th ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific, 1987:496.Search in Google Scholar

3.BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force. Guidelines for compatibility testing in hospital blood banks. In: Roberts BE, ed. Standard haematology practice. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific, 1991:150–63.Search in Google Scholar

4.Issitt PD, Combs MR, Bredehoeft SJ, et al. Lack of clinical significance of “enzyme-only” red cell alloantibodies. Transfusion 1993;33:284–93.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33493242634.x8480348Search in Google Scholar

5.Pereira A, Mazzara R. Enzyme techniques in pre-transfusion testing (letter). Transfusion 1993;33:884.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.331094054629.x8236433Search in Google Scholar

6.van Dijk BA. Lack of clinical significance of “enzyme-only” red cell alloantibodies (letter). Transfusion 1993;33:960.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.331194082389.x8110276Search in Google Scholar

7.Milkins CE. Clinical significance of “enzyme-only” antibodies. Blood Bank Technology Group: British Blood Transfusion Society, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

8.Walker RH, ed. Technical manual. 10th ed. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

9.Issitt PD. Applied blood group serology. 3rd ed. Miami: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1985:93–4.Search in Google Scholar

10.Malde R, Kelsall G, Knight RC. The manual low-ionic strength polybrene technique for detection of red cell antibodies. Med Lab Sci 1986;43:360–3.Search in Google Scholar

11.Mittal KK, Mickey MR, Singal DP, Teraski PI. Serotyping for homotransplantation. Transplantation 1968;6(8):913.10.1097/00007890-196811000-000065696820Search in Google Scholar

12.Baldwin M, Barrasso C, Ness PM, Garratty G. Transfusion of a patient with a probable anti-hr″ (e) antibody only demonstrable in ⁵¹Cr survival studies. Transfusion 1982;23:40–4.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1983.23183147303.x6402832Search in Google Scholar

13.Snyder EL, Spivack M, Novodoff D, Kling G. Haemolytic anti-hr′ (e) detectable solely by an automated polybrene technique. Transfusion 1978;1:79–83.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1978.18178118570.x415394Search in Google Scholar

14.Pickles MM, Jones MN, Egan J, Dodsworth H, Mollison PL. Delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions due to anti-C. Vox Sang 1978;35:32–5.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1978.tb02897.x96602Search in Google Scholar

15.Fudenberg HH, Allen FH Jr. Transfusion reactions in the absence of demonstrable incompatibility. N Eng J Med 1957;256:1180.10.1056/NEJM19570620256250413452017Search in Google Scholar

16.Engelfriet CP, Ouwehand WH. ADCC and other cellular bioassays for predicting the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodies. In: Contreras M, ed. Blood transfusion; the impact of new technologies. Bailliere’s Clinical Haematology. London, England: Bailliere Tindall, 1990:321–37.Search in Google Scholar