Commentary: testing for unexpected red cell antibodies—two or three reagent red cell samples?

1.Code of Federal Regulations, current edition. Title 21, subparts 606 and 660. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Search in Google Scholar

2.Klein HG, ed. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 17th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

3.Oberman HA, Barnes BA, Friedman BA. The risk of abbreviating the crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion. Transfusion 1978;18:137-41.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1978.18278160574.x417431Search in Google Scholar

4.Oberman HA, Barnes BA, Steiner EA. Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility. Transfusion 1982;22:12-6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1982.22182154207.x6801826Search in Google Scholar

5.Oberman HA, Judd WJ. In: Cash JD, ed. Progress in transfusion medicine. Vol.3. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1988:145-58.Search in Google Scholar

6.Cheng G, Hui CH, Lam CK, et al. Haemolytic transfusion reactions due to Mi-antibodies; need to include Miltenberger III positive cells in pre-transfusion antibody screening in Hong Kong. Clin Lab Haematol 1995;17:183-4.Search in Google Scholar

7.Shulman IA, Nelson JM, Okamoto M, Malone SA. The dependence of anti-Jk^a detection on screening cell zygosity. Lab Med 1985;16:602-4.10.1093/labmed/16.10.602Search in Google Scholar

8.Shulman IA, Yaowasiriwatt M, Saxena S, Nelson JM. Influence of reagent RBC zygosity on anti-Fy^a detection. Lab Med 1989; 20:37-9.10.1093/labmed/20.1.37Search in Google Scholar

9.Issitt PD. Applied blood group serology. 3rd ed. Miami, FL: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

10.Lapierre Y, Rigal D, Adam J, et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen–antibody reactions. Transfusion 1990;30:109-13.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30290162894.x2305438Search in Google Scholar

11.Malyska H, Weiland D. The gel test. Lab Med 1994;25:81-5.10.1093/labmed/25.2.81Search in Google Scholar