Callender S, Race RR, Paykoc ZV. Hypersensitivity to transfused blood. Br Med J 1945;2:83.10.1136/bmj.2.4411.83205943520786184Search in Google Scholar
Callender ST, Race RR. A serological and genetical study of multiple antibodies formed in response to blood transfusion by a patient with lupus erythematosus diffusus. Ann Eugen 1946;13:102–17.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1946.tb02346.x21001365Search in Google Scholar
Cutbush M, Chanarin I. The expected blood-group antibody, anti-Lub. Nature 1956;178:855–6.10.1038/178855b013369558Search in Google Scholar
Mohr J. Estimation of linkage between the Lutheran and the Lewis blood groups. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1951;29:339–44.10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb00136.x14933035Search in Google Scholar
Darnborough J, Firth R, Giles CM, Goldsmith KLG, Crawford MN. A ‘new’ antibody anti-LuaLub and two further examples of the genotype Lu(a-b-). Nature 1963;198:796.10.1038/198796a014025138Search in Google Scholar
Karamatic Crew V, Mallinson G, Green C, et al. Different inactivating mutations in the LU genes of three individuals with the Lutheran-null phenotype. Transfusion 2007;47:492–8.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01141.x17319831Search in Google Scholar
Crawford MN, Greenwalt TJ, Sasaki T, Tippett P, Sanger R, Race RR. The phenotype Lu(a-b-) together with unconventional Kidd groups in one family. Transfusion 1961;1:228–32.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1961.tb00047.xSearch in Google Scholar
Singleton BK, Burton NM, Green C, Brady RL, Anstee DJ. Mutations in EKLF/KLF1 form the molecular basis of the rare blood group In(Lu) phenotype. Blood 2008;112:2081–8.10.1182/blood-2008-03-14567218487511Search in Google Scholar
Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Judson PA, Anstee DJ, Tanner MJA, Daniels GL. Evidence that the Lub blood group antigen is located on red cell membrane glycoproteins of 85 and 78 kd. Transfusion 1987;27:61–3.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1987.27187121477.x3810828Search in Google Scholar
Daniels G, Khalid G. Identification, by immunoblotting, of the structures carrying Lutheran and para-Lutheran blood group antigens. Vox Sang 1989;57:137–41.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb01151.x2781741Search in Google Scholar
Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Holmes CH, et al. The Lutheran blood group glycoprotein, another member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is widely expressed in human tissues and is developmentally regulated in human liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:5496–500.10.1073/pnas.92.12.5496417227777537Search in Google Scholar
Parsons SF, Mallinson G, Daniels GL, Green CA, Smythe JS, Anstee DJ. Use of domain-deletion mutants to locate Lutheran blood group antigens to each of the five immunoglobulin superfamily domains of the Lutheran glycoprotein: elucidation of the molecular basis of the Lua/Lub and the Aua/Aub polymorphisms. Blood 1997;88:4219–25.10.1182/blood.V89.11.4219Search in Google Scholar
El Nemer W, Rahuel C, Colin Y, Gane P, Cartron JP, Le Van Kim C. Organization of the human LU gene and molecular basis of the Lua/Lub blood group polymorphism. Blood 1997;89:4608–16.10.1182/blood.V89.12.4608Search in Google Scholar
Karamatic Crew V, Green C, Daniels G. Molecular bases of the antigens of the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion 2003;43:1729–37.10.1111/j.0041-1132.2003.00600.x14641871Search in Google Scholar
Daniels G. Human blood groups. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2002.10.1002/9780470987018Search in Google Scholar
Lögdberg L, Reid ME, Lamont RE, Zelinski T. Human blood group genes 2004: chromosomal locations and cloning strategies. Transfus Med Rev 2005;19:45–57.10.1016/j.tmrv.2004.09.00715830327Search in Google Scholar
Daniels G. Evidence that the Auberger blood group antigens are located on the Lutheran glycoproteins. Vox Sang 1990;58:56–60.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1990.tb02056.x2316212Search in Google Scholar
Isacke CM, Horton MA. The adhesion molecule Facts Book. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 2000.10.1016/B978-012356505-1/50002-2Search in Google Scholar
Mankelow TJ, Burton N, Stefansdottir FO, et al. The laminin 511/521 binding site on the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein is located at the flexible junction of Ig domains 2 and 3. Blood 2007;110:3398–406.10.1182/blood-2007-06-094748220091717638854Search in Google Scholar
Burton NM, Brady RL. Molecular structure of the extracellular region of Lutheran blood group glycoprotein and location of the laminin binding site. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2008;40:446–8.10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.01.00418302987Search in Google Scholar
Rahuel C, Le Van Kim C, Mattei MG, Cartron JP, Colin Y. A unique gene encodes spliceoforms of the B-cell adhesion molecule cell surface glycoprotein of epithelial cancer and of the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein. Blood 1996;88:1865–72.10.1182/blood.V88.5.1865.1865Search in Google Scholar
Campbell IG, Foulkes WD, Senger G, Trowsdale J, Garin-Chesa P, Rettig WJ. Molecular cloning of the B-CAM cell surface glycoprotein of epithelial cancers: a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cancer Res 1994;54:5761–5.Search in Google Scholar
Mourant AE, Kopec AC, Domaniewska-Sobczak K. The distribution of human blood groups and other polymorphisms. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
Chown B, Lewis M, Kaita H. The Lutheran blood groups in two Caucasian population samples. Vox Sang 1966;11:108–10.Search in Google Scholar
Chown B, Lewis M, Kaita H, Philipps S. Some blood group frequencies in a Caucasian population. Vox Sang 1963;8:378–81.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1963.tb05250.xSearch in Google Scholar
Zeng JQ, Deng ZH, Yang BC, et al. Polymorphic analysis of the Lutheran blood group system in Chinese. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2009;39:38–42.Search in Google Scholar
Molthan L, Crawford MN, Marsh WL, Allen FH. Lu9, another new antigen of the Lutheran blood-group system. Vox Sang 1973;24:468–71.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03487.xSearch in Google Scholar
Champagne K, Moulds M, Schmidt J. Anti-Lu9: the finding of the second example after 25 years. Immunohematology 1999;15:113–16.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-629Search in Google Scholar
Crawford MN. The Lutheran blood group system: serology and genetics. In: Pierce SR, Macpherson CR, eds. Blood group systems: Duffy, Kidd and Lutheran. Arlington: American Association of Blood Banks, 1988:93–117.Search in Google Scholar
Marsh WL. Anti-Lu5, anti-Lu6 and anti-Lu7. Three antibodies defining high frequency antigens related to the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion 1972;12:27–34.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1972.tb00018.xSearch in Google Scholar
MacIlroy M, McCreary J, Stroup M. Anti-Lu8, an antibody recognizing another Lutheran-related antigen. Vox Sang 1972;23:455–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1972.tb03835.xSearch in Google Scholar
Judd WJ, Marsh WL, Øyen R, et al. Anti-Lui4: a Lutheran antibody defining the product of an allele at the Lu8 blood group locus. Vox Sang 1977;32:214–19.Search in Google Scholar
Salmon C, Salmon D, Liberge G, André R, Tippett P, Sanger R. Un nouvel antigène de groupe sanguin érythrocytaire présent chez 80% des sujets de race blanche. Nouv Rev Fr Hematol 1961;1:649–61.Search in Google Scholar
Salmon C, Rouger P, Liberge G, Streiff F. A family demonstrating the independence between Lutheran and Auberger loci. Rev Franc Transfus Immuno-Hematol 1981;24:339–43.10.1016/S0338-4535(81)80212-7Search in Google Scholar
Daniels GL, Le Pennec PY, Rouger P, Salmon C, Tippett P. The red cell antigens Aua and Aub belong to the Lutheran system. Vox Sang 1991;60:191–2.Search in Google Scholar
Zelinski T, Kaita H, Coghlan G, Philipps S. Assignment of the Auberger red cell antigen polymorphism to the Lutheran blood group system: genetic justification. Vox Sang 1991;61:275–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1991.tb00959.x1776245Search in Google Scholar
Drachmann O, Thyme S, Tippett P. Serological characteristics of the third anti-Aua. Vox Sang 1982;43:259–62.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1982.tb00022.x7147859Search in Google Scholar
Frandson S, Atkins CJ, Moulds M, Poole J, Crawford MN, Tippett P. Anti-Aub: the antithetical antibody to anti-Aua. Vox Sang 1989;56:54–6.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb03049.x2644738Search in Google Scholar
Karamatic Crew V, Poole J, Banks J, Reed M, Daniels G. LU21: a new high-frequency antigen in the Lutheran blood group system. Vox Sang 2004;87:109–13.10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00542.x15355502Search in Google Scholar
Reid ME, Hoffer J, Øyen R, Tossas E, Sadjadi M, Messina G. The second example of Lu:-7 phenotype: serology and immunochemical studies. Immunohematology 1996;12:66–8.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-748Search in Google Scholar
Karamatic Crew V, Warke N, Ahrens N, Poole J, Daniels G. The second example of LU:-4: a serological and molecular study. Transfus Med 2006;16(Suppl 1):40–1.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00694_39.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sinclair M, Buchanan DK, Tippett P, Sanger R. Another antibody related to the Lutheran blood group system (Much.). Vox Sang 1973;25:156–61.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb04823.x4724954Search in Google Scholar
Ridgwell K, Dixey J, Parson SF, Green CA, Scott ML. Screening human sera for anti-Lu antibodies using soluble recombinant Lu antigens (abstract). Transfus Med 2003;13(Suppl):32.Search in Google Scholar
Seltsam A, Grüger D, Blasczyk R. Prokaryotic versus eukaryotic recombinant Lutheran blood group protein for antibody investigation. Transfusion 2007;47:1630–6.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01334.x17725727Search in Google Scholar
Seltsam A, Agaylan A, Grueger D, Meyer O, Blasczyk R, Salama A. Rapid detection of anti-Lub with recombinant Lub protein and the particle gel immunoassay. Transfusion 2008;48:731–4.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01596.x18366461Search in Google Scholar
Ogasawara K, Tsuneyama H, Uchikawa M, Suto Y, Okazaki H, Tadokoro K. An example of Lutheran-null phenotype in a Japanese individual with 27-kb deletion from intron 2 of the LU genes (abstract). Transfusion 2008;48(Suppl):210A.Search in Google Scholar
Karamatic Crew V, Thornton N, Poole J, Liberman M, Daniels G. A novel example of the recessive Lutheran-null phenotype: a serological and molecular study (abstract). Transfus Med 2009; in press.Search in Google Scholar
Taliano V, Guévin R-M, Tippett P. The genetics of a dominant inhibitor of the Lutheran antigens. Vox Sang 1973;24:42–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb03855.x4682512Search in Google Scholar
Shaw MA, Leak MR, Daniels GL, Tippett P. The rare Lutheran blood group phenotype Lu(a-b-): a genetic study. Ann Hum Genet 1984;48:229–37.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb01019.x6465841Search in Google Scholar
Winkler MM, Hamilton JR. Previously tested donors eliminated to determine rare phenotype frequencies. Abstracts, Joint Congr Int Soc Blood Transfus and Am Assoc Blood Banks, 1990:158.Search in Google Scholar
Udden MM, Umeda M, Hirano Y, Marcus DM. New abnormalities in the morphology, cell surface receptors, and electrolyte metabolism of In(Lu) erythrocytes. Blood 1987;69:52–7.10.1182/blood.V69.1.52.52Search in Google Scholar
Lukasavage T. Donor screening with anti-AnWj. Immunohematology 1993;9:112.Search in Google Scholar
Crawford MN, Tippett P, Sanger R. Antigens Aua, i and P1 of cells of the dominant type of Lu(a-b-). Vox Sang 1974;26:283–7.Search in Google Scholar
Spring FA, Dalchau R, Daniels GL, et al. The Ina and Inb blood group antigens are located on a glycoprotein of 80,000 MW (the CDw44 glycoprotein) whose expression is influenced by the In(Lu) gene. Immunology 1988;64:37–43.Search in Google Scholar
Poole J, Tilley L, Warke N, et al. Two missense mutations in the CD44 gene encode two new antigens of the Indian blood group system. Transfusion 2007;47:1306–11. Correction: Transfusion 2007;47:1741.Search in Google Scholar
Poole J, Levene C, Bennett M, Sela R, van Alphen L, Spruell PJ. A family showing inheritance of the Anton blood group antigen AnWj and independence of AnWj from Lutheran. Transfus Med 1991;1:245–51.10.1111/j.1365-3148.1991.tb00040.x9259856Search in Google Scholar
Daniels GL, Shaw MA, Lomas CG, Leak MR, Tippett P. The effect of In(Lu) on some high-frequency antigens. Transfusion 1986;26:171–2.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26286152909.x3952792Search in Google Scholar
Ballas SK, Marcolina MJ, Crawford MN. In vitro storage and in vivo survival studies of red cells from persons with the In(Lu) gene. Transfusion 1992;32:607–11.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32792391031.x1519324Search in Google Scholar
Norman PC, Tippett P, Beal RW. An Lu(a-b-) phenotype caused by an X-linked recessive gene. Vox Sang 1986;51:49–52.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1986.tb00208.x3739323Search in Google Scholar
Puca KE, Feuger JT, Crew VK, Daniels G, Johnson ST. Acute transfusion reaction (HTR) associated with anti-Lu8 (abstract). Transfusion 2006;46(Suppl):130A.Search in Google Scholar
Richard M, Perreault J, Gane P, El Nemer W, Cartron J-P, St-Louis M. Phage-derived monoclonal anti-Lua. Transfusion 2006;46:1011–17.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00836.x16734819Search in Google Scholar
Parsons SF, Spring FA, Chasis JA, Anstee DJ. Erythroid cell adhesion molecules Lutheran and LW in health and disease. Baillière’s Clin Haematol 1999;12:729–45.10.1053/beha.1999.005010895261Search in Google Scholar
Kikkawa Y, Sasaki T, Nguyen MT, Nomizu M, Mitaka T, Miner JH. The LG1-3 tandem of laminin ±5 harbors the binding sites of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule and ±3²1/±6²1 integrins. J Biol Chem 2007;282:14853–60.10.1074/jbc.M61170620017383963Search in Google Scholar
Southcott MJG, Tanner MJA, Anstee DJ. The expression of human blood group antigens during erythropoiesis in a cell culture system. Blood 1999;93:4425–35.10.1182/blood.V93.12.4425Search in Google Scholar
Bony V, Gane P, Bailly P, Cartron J-P. Time-course expression of polypeptides carrying blood group antigens during human erythroid differentiation. Br J Haematol 1999;107:263–74.10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01721.x10583211Search in Google Scholar
Zen Q, Cottman M, Truskey G, Fraser R, Telen MJ. Critical factors in basal cell adhesion molecule/Lutheran-mediated adhesion to laminin. J Biol Chem 1999;274:728–34.10.1074/jbc.274.2.7289873008Search in Google Scholar
Eyler CE, Telen MJ. The Lutheran glycoprotein: a multifunctional adhesion receptor. Transfusion 2006;46:668–77.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00779.x16584446Search in Google Scholar
El Nemer W, Wautier M-P, Rahuel C, et al. Endothelial Lu/BCAM glycoproteins are novel ligands for red blood cell ±4²1 integrin: role in adhesion of sickle red blood cells to endothelial cells. Blood 2007;109:3544–51.10.1182/blood-2006-07-03513917158232Search in Google Scholar
Gauthier E, Rahuel C, Wautier MP, et al. Protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of Lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule glycoprotein regulates cell adhesion to laminin α5. J Biol Chem 2005;280:30055–62·10.1074/jbc.M50329320015975931Search in Google Scholar
Wautier M-P, El Nemer W, Gane P, et al. Increased adhesion to endothelial cells of erythrocytes from patients with polycythemia vera is mediated by laminin ±5 chain and Lu/bCaM. Blood 2007;110:894–901.10.1182/blood-2006-10-04829817412890Search in Google Scholar
Kroviarski Y, El Nemer W, Gane P, et al. Direct interaction between the Lu/B-CAM adhesion glycoproteins and erythroid spectrin. Br J Haematol 2004;126:255–64.10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05010.x15238148Search in Google Scholar
An X, Gauthier E, Zhang X, Anstee DJ, Mohandas N, Chasis JA. Adhesive activity of Lu glycoproteins is regulated by interaction with spectrin. Blood 2008;112:5212–8.10.1182/blood-2008-03-146068259761518815288Search in Google Scholar
