Molecular background of RH in Bastiaan, the RH:–31,–34 index case, and two novel RHD alleles

1.Shapiro M, Le Roux M, Brink S. Serology and genetics of a new blood factor: hr^B. Haematologia 1972;6:121–8.Search in Google Scholar

2.Moores P, Smart E. Serology and genetics of the red blood cell factor Rh34. Vox Sang 1991;61:122–9.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1991.tb00257.x1763497Search in Google Scholar

3.Rosenfield RE, Allen FH, Jr., Swisher SN, Kochwa S. A review of Rh serology and presentation of a new terminology. Transfusion 1962;2: 287-312.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1962.tb00244.x14494010Search in Google Scholar

4.Issitt PD. An invited review: the Rh antigen e, its variants, and some closely related serological observations. Immunohematology 1991;7:29–36.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-1007Search in Google Scholar

5.Pham B-N, Peyrard T, Tourret S, et al. Anti-Hr^Band anti-hr^brevisited. Transfusion 2009;49:2400–5.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02307.x19624490Search in Google Scholar

6.Noizat-Pirenne F, Lee K, Le Pennec P-Y, et al. Rare RHCE phenotypes in black individuals of Afro-Caribbean origin: identification and transfusion safety. Blood 2002;100:4223–31.10.1182/blood-2002-01-022912393640Search in Google Scholar

7.Shapiro M. Serology and genetics of a new blood factor hr^S. J Forensic Med 1960;7:96–105.Search in Google Scholar

8.Reid ME, Lomas-Francis C. The blood group antigen factsbook. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2004.10.1016/B978-012586585-2/50007-XSearch in Google Scholar

9.Flegel WA. Molecular genetics and clinical applications for RH. Transfus Apher Sci 2011;44:81–91.10.1016/j.transci.2010.12.013304251121277262Search in Google Scholar

10.Patnaik SK, Helmberg W, Blumenfeld OO. BGMUT: NCBI dbRBC database of allelic variations of genes encoding antigens of blood group systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D1023-9.10.1093/nar/gkr958324510222084196Search in Google Scholar

11.Flegel WA. The Rhesus site: explore the intricacies of the most complex blood group gene locus. Ulm, Germany: Institut für Klinische Transfusionsmedizin und Immungenetik Ulm 2007. http://www.uni-ulm.de/%7Ewflegel/RH/.Search in Google Scholar

12.Wagner FF, Frohmajer A, Flegel WA. RHDpositive haplotypes in D negative Europeans. BMC Genet 2001;2:10–24.10.1186/1471-2156-2-103726711495631Search in Google Scholar

13.Simsek S, de Jong CA, Cuijpers HT, et al. Sequence analysis of cDNA derived from reticulocyte mRNAs coding for Rh polypeptides and demonstration of of E/e and C/c polymorphisms. Vox Sang 1994;67:203–9.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1994.tb01661.x7801613Search in Google Scholar

14.Pham BN, Peyrard T, Juszczak G, et al. Heterogeneous molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr B–, Hr B– phenotype in black persons. Transfusion 2009;49:495–504.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02005.x19040491Search in Google Scholar

15.Faas BHW, Beckers EAM, Wildoer P, et al. Molecular background of VS and weak C expression in blacks. Transfusion 1997;37:38–44.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37197176949.x9024488Search in Google Scholar

16.Reid ME, Beal C, Mallory D, Combs MR, Issitt PD. The RH antigens hr^B(RH31) and VS (RH20) may be antithetical. (Abstract) Transfusion 1995;35:51S.Search in Google Scholar

17.Reid ME, Storry JR, Issitt PD, et al. Rh haplotypes that make e but not hr^Busually make VS. Vox Sang 1997;72:41–4.10.1159/000461956Search in Google Scholar

18.Beal CL, Oliver CK, Mallory DM, Issitt PD. The r’ gene is overrepresented in hr^B-negative individuals. Immunohematology 1996;11:74–7.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-793Search in Google Scholar

19.Westhoff CM, Vege S, Hue-Roye K, Nickle P, Lomas-Francis C, Reid M. The RHCE*ceMO allele is linked to RHD*DAU0 and encodes an hr^S– and hr^B– red cell phenotype (abstract). Transfusion 2007;47(Suppl):155A-6A.Search in Google Scholar

20.Hipsky CH, Hue-Roye K, Lomas-Francis C, Huang C-H, Reid ME. Molecular basis of the rare gene complex, DIV(C)–,which encodes four low-prevalence antigens in the Rh blood group system. Vox Sang 2012;102:167–70.10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01519.x21729099Search in Google Scholar

21.Hipsky CH, Lomas-Francis C, Fuchisawa A, et al. RHCE*ceCFencodes partial c and partial e but not CELO an antigen antithetical to Crawford. Transfusion 2011;51:25–31.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02764.x295357620609196Search in Google Scholar

22.Perco P, Shao CP, Mayr WR, Panzer S, Legler TJ. Testing for the D zygosity with three different methods revealed altered Rhesus boxes and a new weak D type. Transfusion 2003;43:335–9.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00313.x12675718Search in Google Scholar

23.Denomme G, Fernandes BJ. The assignment of RHDgene zygosity by densitometric quantification (Abstract). Transfusion 1999;39(Suppl 1):51s.Search in Google Scholar

24.Wagner FF, Moulds JM, Tounkara A, Kouriba B, Flegel WA. RHDallele distribution in Africans of Mali. BMC Genet 2003;4:14–20.10.1186/1471-2156-4-1422291214505497Search in Google Scholar

25.Matheson KA, Denomme GA. Novel 3’Rhesus boxsequences confound RHDzygosity assignment. Transfusion 2002;42:645–50.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00078.x12084174Search in Google Scholar

26.Reid ME, Storry JR, Sausais L, et al. DAK, a new low-incidence antigen in the Rh blood group system. Transfusion 2003;43:1394–7.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00517.x14507270Search in Google Scholar

27.Westhoff CM, Vege S, Halter-Hipsky C, et al. DIIIa and DIII Type 5 are encoded by the same allele and are associated with altered RHCE*ce alleles: clinical implications. Transfusion 2010;50:1303–11.10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02573.x290851920088832Search in Google Scholar

28.Vege S, Westhoff CM. Identification of altered RHD and RHCE alleles: A comparison of manual and automated molecular methods. In: Moulds JM, Ness PM, Sloan SR, eds. BeadChip molecular immunohematology. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010:121–31.Search in Google Scholar