Cite

Rosenfield RE. What should the term Rh-negative connote? Vox Sang 1984;46:89–94.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1984.tb00133.xSearch in Google Scholar

Broman B. Swedish thoughts on Du nomenclature. Transfusion 1984;24:85.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1984.24184122572.x6420956Search in Google Scholar

Mollison PJ. Blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 7th ed. London: Blackwell, 1983:337–8.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt PJ, Morrison EG, Shohl J. The antigenicity of the Rh (Du) blood factor. Blood 1962;20:196–202.10.1182/blood.V20.2.196.196Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt PJ, ed and comp. Standards for blood bankers and transfusion services. 11th ed. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt PJ, Klein RE, Sherwood WC. Du confirmation. Transfusion 1986;26:364–5.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26486262745.x3088785Search in Google Scholar

Sebring ES, Polesky HF. Detection of fetal-maternal hemorrhage in Rh immune globulin candidates. Tranfusion 1982;22:468–71.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1982.22683068604.x6183802Search in Google Scholar

Moore BPL. Does knowledge of Du status serve a useful purpose? Vox Sang 1984;46:95–7.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1984.tb00134.xSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1930-3955
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Laboratory Medicine