The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainer usage protocols on the stability of fixed orthodontic treatment results

1. Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;CD002283. Littlewood SJ Millett DT Doubleday B Bearn DR Worthington HV . Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 ; CD002283 . 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4713820626824885 Search in Google Scholar

2. Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J 2017;62:51-7. Littlewood SJ Kandasamy S Huang G . Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J 2017 ; 62 : 51 - 7 . 10.1111/adj.1247528297088 Search in Google Scholar

3. Mai W, He J, Meng H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Li M et al. Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:720-7. Mai W He J Meng H Jiang Y Huang C Li M . Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014 ; 145 : 720 - 7 . 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.01924880842 Search in Google Scholar

4. Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P et al. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:730-7. Rowland H Hichens L Williams A Hills D Killingback N Ewings P . The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 ; 132 : 730 - 7 . 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.01918068589 Search in Google Scholar

5. Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZS. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e224-31. Ramazanzadeh B Ahrari F Hosseini ZS . The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. J Clin Exp Dent 2018 ; 10 : e224 - 31 . 10.4317/jced.54511592389629721222 Search in Google Scholar

6. Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:453-61. Saleh M Hajeer MY Muessig D . Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2017 ; 39 : 453 - 61 . 10.1093/ejo/cjx02428430890 Search in Google Scholar

7. Atik E, Esen Aydinli F, Kulak Kayikçi ME, Ciger S. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:440-5. Atik E Esen Aydinli F Kulak Kayikçi ME Ciger S . Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech. Eur J Orthod 2017 ; 39 : 440 - 5 . Search in Google Scholar

8. Sauget E, Covell DA Jr, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Angle Orthod 1997;67:223-30. Sauget E Covell DA Jr Boero RP Lieber WS . Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Angle Orthod 1997 ; 67 : 223 - 30 . Search in Google Scholar

9. Sun J, Yu YC, Liu MY, Chen L, Li HW, Zhang L et al. Survival time comparison between Hawley and clear overlay retainers: a randomized trial. J Dent Res 2011;90:1197-201. Sun J Yu YC Liu MY Chen L Li HW Zhang L . Survival time comparison between Hawley and clear overlay retainers: a randomized trial. J Dent Res 2011 ; 90 : 1197 - 201 . 10.1177/002203451141527421771797 Search in Google Scholar

10. Kacer KA, Valiathan M, Narendran S, Hans MG. Retainer wear and compliance in the first 2 years after active orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:592-8. Kacer KA Valiathan M Narendran S Hans MG . Retainer wear and compliance in the first 2 years after active orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010 ; 138 : 592 - 8 . 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.02721055599 Search in Google Scholar

11. Joondeph DR, Huang G, Little R. Stability, Retention, and Relapse. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, Huang GJ, eds. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2017;981-97. Joondeph DR Huang G Little R . Stability, Retention, and Relapse . In: Graber LW Vanarsdall RL Vig KW Huang GJ , eds. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques . St. Louis, Missouri : Elsevier , 2017 ; 981 - 97 . Search in Google Scholar

12. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2013;606-20. Proffit WR Fields HW Larson BE Sarver DM . Contemporary Orthodontics . St. Louis, Missouri : Elsevier , 2013 ; 606 - 20 . Search in Google Scholar

13. Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:475-9. Jäderberg S Feldmann I Engström C . Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod 2012 ; 34 : 475 - 9 . 10.1093/ejo/cjr04021508267 Search in Google Scholar

14. Shawesh M, Bhatti B, Usmani T, Mandall N. Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:165-70. Shawesh M Bhatti B Usmani T Mandall N . Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2010 ; 32 : 165 - 70 . 10.1093/ejo/cjp08219797411 Search in Google Scholar

15. Kumar AG, Bansal A. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Aust Orthod J 2011;27:52-6. Kumar AG Bansal A . Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Aust Orthod J 2011 ; 27 : 52 - 6 . Search in Google Scholar

16. Destang DL, Kerr WJ. Maxillary retention: is longer better? Eur J Orthod 2003;25:65-9. Destang DL Kerr WJ . Maxillary retention: is longer better? Eur J Orthod 2003 ; 25 : 65 - 9 . 10.1093/ejo/25.1.65 Search in Google Scholar

17. Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68:554-63. Little RM . The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975 ; 68 : 554 - 63 . 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-X Search in Google Scholar

18. Dag O, Dolgun A, Konar NM. onewaytests: An R Package for One-Way Tests in Independent Groups Designs. R Journal 2018;10:175-99. Dag O Dolgun A Konar NM . onewaytests: An R Package for One-Way Tests in Independent Groups Designs. R Journal 2018 ; 10 : 175 - 99 . 10.32614/RJ-2018-022 Search in Google Scholar

19. Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:1-5. Thickett E Power S . A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod 2010 ; 32 : 1 - 5 . 10.1093/ejo/cjp06119828592 Search in Google Scholar

20. Gill DS, Naini FB, Jones A, Tredwin CJ. Part-time versus fulltime retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial. World J Orthod 2007;8:300-6. Gill DS Naini FB Jones A Tredwin CJ . Part-time versus fulltime retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial. World J Orthod 2007 ; 8 : 300 - 6 . Search in Google Scholar

21. Barlin S, Smith R, Reed R, Sandy J, Ireland AJ. A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers. Angle Orthod 2011;81:404-9. Barlin S Smith R Reed R Sandy J Ireland AJ . A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers. Angle Orthod 2011 ; 81 : 404 - 9 . 10.2319/072610-437.1892354721261482 Search in Google Scholar

22. Demir A, Babacan H, Nalcacı R, Topcuoglu T. Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:255-62. Demir A Babacan H Nalcacı R Topcuoglu T . Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers. Korean J Orthod 2012 ; 42 : 255 - 62 . 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.5.255349525723173119 Search in Google Scholar