Effectiveness of photographs of study models for IOTN scoring

1. Richardson ME, Adam CP, McCartney TPG. An analysis of tooth measuring methods in dental casts. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1963:285-301.Search in Google Scholar

2. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (Commencement No. 1) Order 1987, ISBN 0110776801.Search in Google Scholar

3. Harradine N, Suominen R, Stephens C, Hathorn I, Brown I. Holograms as substitutes for orthodontic study casts: a pilot clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:110-6.10.1016/0889-5406(90)70004-VSearch in Google Scholar

4. Malik OH, Abdi-Oskouei M, Mandall NA. An alternative to study model storage. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:156-9.10.1093/ejo/cjn07119028672Search in Google Scholar

5. Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System: Digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.04217208106Search in Google Scholar

6. Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:624-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.01716286210Search in Google Scholar

7. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-320.10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a0359992792220Search in Google Scholar

8. Linder-Aronson S. Orthodontics in the Swedish Public Dental Health Service. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1974;233-40.Search in Google Scholar

9. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987;9:314-8.10.1093/ejo/9.1.314Search in Google Scholar

10. Mandall NA. Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening? J Orthod 2002;29:125-7.Search in Google Scholar

11. Uçüncü N, Ertugay E. The use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in a school population and referred population. J Orthod 2001;28:45-52.10.1093/ortho/28.1.4511254803Search in Google Scholar

12. Burden DJ, Holmes A. The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the United Kingdom. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:395-9.10.1093/ejo/16.5.3957805813Search in Google Scholar

13. Richmond S, Roberts CT, Andrew M. Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre- and post-appliance therapy. Br J Orthod 1994;21:175-84.10.1179/bjo.21.2.1758043566Search in Google Scholar

14. So LL, Tang EL. A comparative study using the Occlusal index and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Angle Orthod 1993;63:57-64.Search in Google Scholar

15. British Standard Institute. British Standard Incisor Classification. Glossary of Dental terms BS4492. London: British Standard Institute, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Means 1960;20:37-46.10.1177/001316446002000104Search in Google Scholar

17. Wong HM, McGrath C, Lo EC, King NM. Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:438-46.10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00245.x16262611Search in Google Scholar

18. Sandler PJ, Murray AM, Bearn D. Digital records in orthodontics. Dent Update 2002;29:18-24.10.12968/denu.2002.29.1.1811890018Search in Google Scholar

19. Mok CW, Zhou L, McGrath C, Hägg U, Bendeus M. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:362-8.10.1080/0001635070177185018071959Search in Google Scholar

20. Buchanan IB, Downing A, Stirrups DR. A comparison of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need applied clinically and to diagnostic records. Br J Orthod 1994;21:185-8.10.1179/bjo.21.2.1858043567Search in Google Scholar