[1. Richardson ME, Adam CP, McCartney TPG. An analysis of tooth measuring methods in dental casts. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1963:285-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (Commencement No. 1) Order 1987, ISBN 0110776801.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Harradine N, Suominen R, Stephens C, Hathorn I, Brown I. Holograms as substitutes for orthodontic study casts: a pilot clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:110-6.10.1016/0889-5406(90)70004-V]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Malik OH, Abdi-Oskouei M, Mandall NA. An alternative to study model storage. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:156-9.10.1093/ejo/cjn07119028672]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System: Digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.04217208106]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:624-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.01716286210]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-320.10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a0359992792220]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Linder-Aronson S. Orthodontics in the Swedish Public Dental Health Service. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1974;233-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987;9:314-8.10.1093/ejo/9.1.314]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Mandall NA. Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening? J Orthod 2002;29:125-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Uçüncü N, Ertugay E. The use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in a school population and referred population. J Orthod 2001;28:45-52.10.1093/ortho/28.1.4511254803]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Burden DJ, Holmes A. The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the United Kingdom. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:395-9.10.1093/ejo/16.5.3957805813]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Richmond S, Roberts CT, Andrew M. Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre- and post-appliance therapy. Br J Orthod 1994;21:175-84.10.1179/bjo.21.2.1758043566]Search in Google Scholar
[14. So LL, Tang EL. A comparative study using the Occlusal index and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Angle Orthod 1993;63:57-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. British Standard Institute. British Standard Incisor Classification. Glossary of Dental terms BS4492. London: British Standard Institute, 1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Means 1960;20:37-46.10.1177/001316446002000104]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Wong HM, McGrath C, Lo EC, King NM. Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:438-46.10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00245.x16262611]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Sandler PJ, Murray AM, Bearn D. Digital records in orthodontics. Dent Update 2002;29:18-24.10.12968/denu.2002.29.1.1811890018]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Mok CW, Zhou L, McGrath C, Hägg U, Bendeus M. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:362-8.10.1080/0001635070177185018071959]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Buchanan IB, Downing A, Stirrups DR. A comparison of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need applied clinically and to diagnostic records. Br J Orthod 1994;21:185-8.10.1179/bjo.21.2.1858043567]Search in Google Scholar