[1. Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81:12-21.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01489.x]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Celikoglu M, Akpinar S, Yavuz I. The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e791-6.10.4317/medoral.15.e791]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Haas AJ. The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1965;35:200-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970;57:219-55.10.1016/0002-9416(70)90241-1]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Turley PK. Orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and custom protraction headgear. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:314-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:583-92.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70003-X]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Altug Z, Arslan AD. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:360-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Celikoglu M, Oktay H. Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:86-92.10.1093/ejo/cjt00623460730]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Celikoglu M, Yavuz I, Unal T, Oktay H, Erdem A. Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2115-22.10.1007/s00784-015-1408-525711173]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Yavuz I, Halicioğlu K, Ceylan I. Face mask therapy effects in two skeletal maturation groups of female subjects with skeletal Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:842-8.10.2319/090308-462.119705942]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Liou EJ. Effective maxillary orthopedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulates distraction osteogenesis. ProgOrthod 2005;6:154-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Wang YC, Chang PM, Liou EJ. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:230-4.10.2319/031208-141.119216603]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Haas AJ. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 1980;50:189-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Liou EJ, Tsai WC. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:121-7.10.1597/03-107.115748102]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Isci D, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:706-15.10.1093/ejo/cjq00620457582]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Canturk BH, Celikoglu M. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure. Angle Orthod 2015;85:284-91.10.2319/031114-176.1863188325017013]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Masucci C, Defraia E. Early Alt-RAMEC and facial mask protocol in class III malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 2011;45:601-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Masucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Defraia E. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014;17:259-69.10.1111/ocr.1205125041370]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Rathi AR, Kumari NR, Vadakkepuriyal K, Santhkumar M. Treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion using face mask therapy with alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) protocol. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33:341-3.10.4103/0970-4388.16571326381639]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Yilmaz BS, Kucukkeles N. Skeletal, soft tissue, and airway changes following the alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol. Angle Orthod 2014;84:868-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Pandis N. Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:519-21.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.01022464536]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Liou EJ. Toothborne orthopedic maxillary protraction in Class III patients. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:68-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Kilic N, Celikoglu M, Oktay H. Effects of the functional regulator III on profile changes in subjects with maxillary deficiency. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:729-34.10.1093/ejo/cjq01120453006]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F. Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study. Angle Orthod 2011;81:639-46.10.2319/081010-473.1891973821299407]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Feres MF, Raza H, Alhadlaq A, El-Bialy T. Rapid maxillary expansion effects in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2015;85:1070-9.10.2319/102514-768.1861206026516713]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Nur M, Kayipmaz S, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Kilkis D, Sezgin OS. Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:579-84.10.2319/080311-488.1884555321999214]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kilkis D, Sezgin OS, Bayram M. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. Aust Orthod J 2013;29:153-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Sekerci AE, Buyuk SK, Toy E. Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2014;84:782-7.10.2319/101013-748.1864127324592903]Search in Google Scholar