Interproximal reduction in orthodontics: why, where, how much to remove?

1. Danesh G, Hellak A, Lippold C, Ziebura T, Schafer E. Enamel surfaces following interproximal reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1004-10.10.2319/041806-165.1Search in Google Scholar

2. Barcoma E, Shroff B, Best AM, Shoff MC, Lindauer SJ. Interproximal reduction of teeth: Differences in perspective between orthodontists and dentists. Angle Orthod 2015;85:820-5.10.2319/072314-515.1Search in Google Scholar

3. Ballard ML. Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1944;14:67-70.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;23:113-30.Search in Google Scholar

5. Lapenaite E, Lopatiene K. Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija 2014;16:19-24.Search in Google Scholar

6. Lusterman EA. Treatment of a Class II Division 2 malocclusion involving mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth: report of a case. Am J Orthod 1954;40:44-50.10.1016/0002-9416(54)90169-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ. Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:315-20.Search in Google Scholar

8. Nazruddin T. Treatment of crowding teeth with interproximal reduction of the teeth. J Dent Res 1997;76:1209-10.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sheridan JJ. The physiologic rationale for air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:609-12.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hudson AL. A study of the effects of mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 1956;42:615-24.10.1016/0002-9416(56)90103-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Stroud JL, English J, Buschang PH. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 1998;68:141-6.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chua ES, Felicita AS. The orthodontic extraction of permanent molars: a literature review. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:69-77.Search in Google Scholar

13. Peck H, Peck S. An index for assessing tooth shape deviations as applied to the mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1972;61:384-401.10.1016/0002-9416(72)90302-8Search in Google Scholar

14. Peck S, Peck H. Crown dimensions and mandibular incisor alignment. Angle Orthod 1972;42:148-53.Search in Google Scholar

15. Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and stability: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:299-306.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70212-4Search in Google Scholar

16. Gilmore CA, Little RM. Mandibular incisor dimensions and crowding. Am J Orthod 1984;86:493-502.10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90355-5Search in Google Scholar

17. Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, 9 years in retrospect. 1. Angle Orthod 1980;50:88-97.Search in Google Scholar

18. Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention 9 years in retrospect. 2. Angle Orthod 1980;50:169-78.Search in Google Scholar

19. Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:345-53.10.1093/ejo/cju063Search in Google Scholar

20. Yitschaky O, Neuhof MS, Yitschaky M, Zini A. Relationship between dental crowding and mandibular incisor proclination during orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent mandibular teeth. Angle Orthod 2016;86:727-33.10.2319/080815-536.1Search in Google Scholar

21. De la cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:518-30.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70119-2Search in Google Scholar

22. Felton JM, Sinclair PM, Jones DL, Alexander RG. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:478-83.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90229-0Search in Google Scholar

23. Duncan LO, Piedade L, Lekic M, Cunha RS, Wiltshire WA. Changes in mandibular incisor position and arch form resulting from Invisalign correction of the crowded dentition treated nonextraction. Angle Orthod 2016;86:577-83.10.2319/042415-280.1Search in Google Scholar

24. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-6.10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.995Search in Google Scholar

25. Aldrees AM, Al-Shujaa AM, Alqahtani MA, Aljhani AS. Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy? BMC Oral Health 2015;15:70.Search in Google Scholar

26. Heusdens M, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The effect of tooth size discrepancy on occlusion: An experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:184-91.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70230-7Search in Google Scholar

27. Jarjoura K, Gagnon G, Nieberg L. Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:26-30.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.024Search in Google Scholar

28. Chenin DA, Trosien AH, Fong PF, Miller RA, Lee RS. Orthodontic treatment with a series of removable appliances. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1232-9.10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0358Search in Google Scholar

29. Germeç D, Taner TU. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:539-49.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.052Search in Google Scholar

30. Travess H, Roberts-Harry D, Sandy J. Orthodontics. Part 8: Extractions in orthodontics. Brit Dent J 2004;196:195-203.10.1038/sj.bdj.4810979Search in Google Scholar

31. Gillings B, Buonocore M. An investigation of enamel thickness in human lower incisor teeth. J Dent Res 1961;40:105-18.10.1177/00220345610400010201Search in Google Scholar

32. Shillingburg HT Jr, Grace CS. Thickness of enamel and dentin. J South Cal Dent Assoc 1973;41:33-6.Search in Google Scholar

33. Peck H, Peck S. Reproximation (enamel stripping) as an essential orthodontic treatment ingredient. Transactions of the 3^rd International Orthodontic Congress. London, 1975:513-23.Search in Google Scholar

34. Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod 1975;68:157-64.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90204-3Search in Google Scholar

35. Moss ML, Moss-Salentijn L. Analysis of developmental processes possibly related to human dental sexual dimorphism in permanent and deciduous canines. Am J Phys Anthropol 1977;46:407-13.10.1002/ajpa.1330460305Search in Google Scholar

36. Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:169-71.10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7835519Search in Google Scholar

37. Harris EF, Hicks JD. A radiographic assessment of enamel thickness in human maxillary incisors. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:825-31.10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00061-2Search in Google Scholar

38. Grine FE, Stevens NJ, Jungers WL. An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:1117-25.10.1016/S0003-9969(01)00078-4Search in Google Scholar

39. Hall NE, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B. Predictors of variation in mandibular incisor enamel thickness. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:809-15.10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0270Search in Google Scholar

40. Sarig R, Vardimon AD, Sussan C, Benny L, Sarne O, Hershkovitz I et al. Pattern of maxillary and mandibular proximal enamel thickness at the contact area of the permanent dentition from first molar to first molar. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:435-44.10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.026Search in Google Scholar

41. Johner AM, Pandis N, Dudic A, Kiliaridis S. Quantitative comparison of three enamel-stripping devices: how precisely can we strip teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:S168-72.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.001Search in Google Scholar

42. Gupta P, Gupta N, Patel N, Gupta R, Sandhu GS, Naik C. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study. Aust Orthod J 2012;28:240-4.Search in Google Scholar

43. Twesme DA, Firestone AR, Heaven TJ, Feagin FF, Jacobson A. Airrotor stripping and enamel demineralization in-vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:142-52.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70110-5Search in Google Scholar

44. Zachrisson BU. Actual damage to teeth and periodontal tissues with mesiodistal enamel reduction (“stripping”). World J Orthod 2004;5:178-83.Search in Google Scholar

45. Bishara S. An interview with Robert L. Vanarsdall Jr. World J Orthod 2004;5:74-6.Search in Google Scholar

46. Yagci A, Uysal T, Demirsoy KK, Percin D. Relationship between odontogenic bacteremia and orthodontic stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2013;144:73-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.024Search in Google Scholar

47. Artun J, Kokich VG, Osterberg SK. Long-Term effect of root proximity on periodontal health after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:125-30.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90469-0Search in Google Scholar

48. Zingler S, Sommer A, Sen S, Saure D, Langer J, Guillon O et al.Efficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel reduction (IER) and enamel roughness before and after polishing-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Invest 2016;20:933-42.10.1007/s00784-015-1585-2Search in Google Scholar

49. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ. Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:351-9.10.1016/0889-5406(92)70051-BSearch in Google Scholar

50. Lundgren T, Milleding P, Mohlin B, Nannmark U. Restitution of enamel after interdental stripping. Swed Dent J 1993;17:217-24.Search in Google Scholar

51. Piacentini C, Sfondrini G. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:57-63.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70163-4Search in Google Scholar

52. Arman A, Cehreli SB, Ozel E, Arhun N, Cetinşahin A, Soyman M. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:131. e7-14.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.02116905055Search in Google Scholar

53. Koretsi V, Chatzigianni A, Sidiropoulou S. Enamel roughness and incidence of caries after interproximal enamel reduction: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014;17:1-13.10.1111/ocr.1203024011354Search in Google Scholar

54. Zhong M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Zellmann M, Zellmann S, Radlanski RJ. Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:432-9.10.1007/PL00001911Search in Google Scholar

55. Zhong M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Radlanski RJ, Miethke RR. SEM evaluation of a new technique for interdental stripping. J Clin Orthod 1999;33:286-92.Search in Google Scholar

56. Zachrisson BU, Minster L, Ogaard B, Birkhed D. Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: caries risk in posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:90-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.00221195282Search in Google Scholar

57. Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Zimmer B. Morphology of interdentally stripped enamel one year after treatment. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:748-50.Search in Google Scholar

58. Crain G, Sheridan JJ. Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:84-5.Search in Google Scholar

59. El-Mangoury NH, Moussa MM, Mostafa YA, Girgis AS. In-vivo remineralization after air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:75-8.Search in Google Scholar

60. Zachrisson BU, Nyøygaard L, Mobarak K. Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:162-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.00117276856Search in Google Scholar