Dentoskeletal and airway effects of the X-Bow applian ce versus removable functional appliances (Frankel-2 and Trainer) in prepubertal Class II division 1 malocclusion patients

1. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontics. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Company, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

2. Marinelli A, Mariotti M, Defraia E. Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition. Prog Orthod 2011;12:31-7.10.1016/j.pio.2011.02.006Search in Google Scholar

3. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod 2003;73:674-85.Search in Google Scholar

4. Shu R, Han X, Wang Y, Xu H, Ai D, Wang L et al. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion. Angle Orthod 2013;83:246-52.10.2319/052412-427.2Search in Google Scholar

5. Perillo L, Johnston LE Jr, Ferro A. Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:132-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70173-7Search in Google Scholar

6. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Guray E. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Angle Orthod 2004;74:605-9.Search in Google Scholar

7. Owen AH 3rd. Morphologic changes in the transverse dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod 1983;83:200-17.10.1016/0002-9416(83)90084-2Search in Google Scholar

8. Gibbs SL, Hunt NP. Functional appliances and arch width. Br J Orthod 1992;19:117-25.10.1179/bjo.19.2.1171627522Search in Google Scholar

9. Miller RA, Tieu L, Flores-Mir C. Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2013;83:431-6.10.2319/062712-528.1876308123030552Search in Google Scholar

10. Achilleos S, Krogstad O, Lyberg T. Surgical mandibular advancement and changes in uvuloglossopharyngeal morphology and head posture: a short- and long-term cephalometric study in males. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:367-81.10.1093/ejo/22.4.36711029826Search in Google Scholar

11. Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gögen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class II cases. Angle Orthod 1998;68:327-36.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:598-605.10.1093/ejo/cjn05518974068Search in Google Scholar

13. Godt A, Koos B, Hagen H, Göz G. Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:440-6.10.2319/090710-525.1892355621261483Search in Google Scholar

14. Yassaei S, Bahrololoomi Z, Sorush M. Changes of tongue position and oropharynx following treatment with functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007;31:287-90.10.17796/jcpd.31.4.lp479v346345460g19161068Search in Google Scholar

15. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:58-66.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70157-5Search in Google Scholar

16. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition. Ann Arbor: Needham Press Inc, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

17. Gianelly AA. Rapid palatal expansion in the absence of crossbites: added value? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:362-5.Search in Google Scholar

18. Flores-Mir C, Barnett G, Higgins DW, Heo G, Major PW. Shortterm skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:822-32.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.021Search in Google Scholar

19. Perinetti G, Primožič J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in pre-pubertal and pubertal Class II patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. PloS One 2015;10:e0141198.10.1371/journal.pone.0141198Search in Google Scholar

20. Perillo L, Femiano A, Palumbo S, Contardo L, Perinetti G. Skeletal and dental effects produced by functional regulator-2 in pre-pubertal class II patients: a controlled study. Prog Orthod 2013;14:18.10.1186/2196-1042-14-18Search in Google Scholar

21. Janson GR, Toruño JL, Martins DR, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:301-9.10.1093/ejo/25.3.301Search in Google Scholar

22. Chadwick SM, Aird JC, Taylor PJ, Bearn DR. Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:495-505.10.1093/ejo/23.5.495Search in Google Scholar

23. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO 3rd. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 1994;64:113-22.Search in Google Scholar

24. Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 1999;69:311-20.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Dental and skeletal changes in mild to moderate Class II malocclusions treated by either a Twin-block or Xbow appliance followed by full fixed orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2015;85:997-1002.10.2319/092814-696.1Search in Google Scholar

26. Freeman DC, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Fränkel C. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:570 e1-6; discussion 570-1.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.029Search in Google Scholar

27. Rushforth CD, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. British J Orthod 1999;26:127-34.10.1093/ortho/26.2.127Search in Google Scholar

28. Nielsen IL. Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod 1984;85:401-10.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90161-1Search in Google Scholar

29. Franchi L, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Defraia E, Baccetti T. Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2011;81:678-83.10.2319/102710-629.1Search in Google Scholar

30. Cacciatore G, Alvetro L, Defraia E, Ghislanzoni LT, Franchi L. Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:136-42.10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.136Search in Google Scholar

31. Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2015;85:784-9.10.2319/090514-624.1Search in Google Scholar

32. Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Aust Orthod J 2011;27:110-6.Search in Google Scholar

33. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-YSearch in Google Scholar

34. Tallgren A, Christiansen RL, Ash M Jr, Miller RL. Effects of a myofunctional appliance on orofacial muscle activity and structures. Angle Orthod 1998;68:249-58.Search in Google Scholar

35. Erbas B, Kocadereli I. Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014;84:693-700.10.2319/072213-533.1Search in Google Scholar

36. Bilgiç F, Başaran G, Hamamci O. Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:445-51.10.1007/s00784-014-1237-ySearch in Google Scholar

37. Gao H, Xiao D, Zhao Z. [Effects of Fränkel II appliance on sagittal dimensions of upper airway in children]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;21:116-7. Chinese.Search in Google Scholar

38. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod 2013;83:728-34.10.2319/083112-702.1Search in Google Scholar

39. Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:301-20.10.1007/s00056-011-0035-2Search in Google Scholar

40. Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D. Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod 2014;84:260-4.10.2319/042513-319.1Search in Google Scholar

41. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:128-37.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00345-7Search in Google Scholar