Subsidiarity in Management & Business Activity: The Two Sides of the Phenomenon

1. Aguinis, H., Martin, G.P., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., O’Boyle, Jr., E.H., & Joo, H. (2018). Two sides of CEO pay injustice: A power law conceptualization of CEO over and underpayment. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 16(1), 3-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2017-0731 Search in Google Scholar

2. Aßländer, M.S. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility as Subsidiary Co-Responsibility: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 115-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10551-011-0744-x Search in Google Scholar

3. Alteri, A.M. (2016). Gender-Based Discrimination in the Workplace: Why Courts Tell Employers That Breastfeeding Discrimination Is Legal. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 264-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1177/0734371X15587979 Search in Google Scholar

4. Anguita, P.M., Martín, M.A., & Clare, A. (2014). Environmental Subsidiarity as a Guiding Principle for Forestry Governance: Application to Payment for Ecosystem Services and REDD+ Architecture. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 27, 617-631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10806-013-9481-8 Search in Google Scholar

5. Ashta, A. & Mor, S. (2022). Is microcredit a reverse innovation? FIIB Busines Review, 11(2), 225-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1177/2319714520962924 Search in Google Scholar

6. Baggini, J. & Fosl, P.S. (2010). Przybornik etyka. Kompendium metod i pojęć etycznych. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax. [The Ethics Toolkit. A Compendium of Ethical Concepts and Methods]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

7. Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (eds.) Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Vol. 1: Theory (pp. 45-103). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Pub. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

8. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Search in Google Scholar

9. Barreto, D. (2018). Presidentes de empresas ganham 46 vezes mais que os trabalhadores. [CEOs earn 46 times more than workers]. Sábado. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

10. Bernoux, P. (1989). A sociologia das organizações. [Sociology of organizations]. Porto: Rés. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

11. Bianchi, P. (1996). Subsidiarity and its significance. In Pat Devine, Yannis Katsoulacos & Roger Sugden (eds.). Competitiveness, subsidiarity and industrial policy (pp. 43-58). London: Routledge. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

12. Cabała, P. (2007). Prakseologiczna analiza działania. [Praxeological analysis of action]. Prakseologia, 147, 9-18. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

13. Canário, S.F. (2015). Portugal Sou Eu, Revealing the ‘Made in Portugal’ Stamp. [Portugal Sou Eu, Revealing the ‘Made in Portugal’ Stamp]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Católica Lisbon, School of Business & Economics. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

14. Carroll, A.B. & Meeks, M.D. (1999). Models of management morality: European applications and implications. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(2), 108-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1111/1467-8608.00135 Search in Google Scholar

15. Chambel, M.J. & Curral, L. (1995). Psicossociologia das Organizações. [Psychosociology of organizations]. Lisboa: Texto Editora. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

16. Chiavenato, I. (1983). Introdução à teoria geral da administração. [Introduction to general management theory]. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

17. Cordeiro, B.O. (2020). Global mobility of microfinance policies. Policy and Society, 39(1), 19-35. [CrossRef]10.1080/14494035.2019.1659472 Search in Google Scholar

18. Cremers, M. (2017). What Corporate Governance Can Learn from Catholic Social Teaching. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 711-724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10551-016-3127-5 Search in Google Scholar

19. Derksen, M. (2014). Turning men into machnies? Scientific management, industrial psychology, and the “human factor”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1002/jhbs.21650 Search in Google Scholar

20. Doliński, D. (1995). Etyka produktywności. Czy duch kapitalizmu krąży nad Polską? [Productivity ethics. Is the spirit of capitalism hovering over Poland?]. Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 2, 11-21. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

21. Duarte, F.C. & Nacle, I.C.C. (2013). Subsidiariedade: a evolução do princípio constitucional limitador da interferência estatal. [Subsidiarity: the evolution of the constitutional principle limiting state interference]. Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, 68, 91-107. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

22. Enderle, G. & Arruda, M.C. (2004). Improving Globalization: An Introduction. In M.C. Arruda & G. Enderle (eds). Improving Globalization (pp. 7-13). Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

23. Freire, J. (1993). Sociologia do trabalho: uma introdução. [Sociology of work: an introduction]. Porto: Ed. Afrontamento. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

24. Gasparski, W. (1995).Wartościowanie działań. [Valuing actions]. Prakseologia, 1-2(126-127), 15-28. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

25. Głuszczuk, D. (2013). Regionalna polityka innowacyjna – dualność i jej zasady. [Regional innovation policy - duality and its principles]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 285, 38-45. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

26. Godwin, S. (2020). Children’s capacities and paternalism. The Journal of Ethics, 24, 307-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10892-020-09327-1 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gonçalves, H.M., Silva, G., & Brites, R. (2017). Estudo do Impacto da Adesão ao “PORTUGAL SOU EU” nas Empresas. [Study of the Impact of Adherence to “PORTUGAL SOU EU” on Companies]. ISEG – Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, CEGE – Centro de Estudos de Gestão. Retrieved 14.03.2018. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

28. Goodpaster, K.E., Maines, T.D., Naughton, M., & Shapiro, B. (2018). Using UNPRME to Teach, Research, and Enact Business Ethics: Insights from the Catholic Identity Matrix for Business Schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 761-777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10551-017-3434-5 Search in Google Scholar

29. Gussen, B.F. (2015). Is subsidiarity a conditio sine qua non for sustainability? [Is subsidiarity a condition without which there would be no sustainability?] Policy Studies, 36(4), 384-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/01442872.2015.1073244 Search in Google Scholar

30. Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.2307/2095567 Search in Google Scholar

31. Harrison, E.F. (1987). The managerial decision-making process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

32. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53-62. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

33. Herzberg, F. (1996). A Teoria Motivação-Higiene. [The Motivation-Hygiene Theory]. In C.A. Marques i M.P. Cunha (eds.). Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão de Empresas [Organizational behavior and business management] (pp. 43-65). Lisboa: Pub. Dom Quixote. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

34. Ibrahim, Y., Ahmed, I., & Minai, M.S. (2018). The influence of institutional characteristics on financial performance of microfinance institutions in the OIC countries. Journal of Scientific Papers Economics & Sociology, 11(2), 19-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/2 Search in Google Scholar

35. Jarosz, M. (2007). Dysfunkcje polskiej transformacji [Dysfunctions of the Polish transformation]. In B. Klimczak & A. Lewicka-Strzałecka (eds.). Etyka i ekonomia (pp. 109-132). Warszawa: PWE. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

36. Jesson, J. & Lacey, F. (2006). How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 139-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/15602210600616218 Search in Google Scholar

37. Kelley, S. (2009). Subsidiarity: challenging the top down bias. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 1(2), Art.2. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

38. Kelly, J.E. (2004). Solidarity and Subsidiarity: „Organizing Principles” for Corporate Moral Leadership in the New Global Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 283-295. [Google Scholar]10.1023/B:BUSI.0000037479.11370.cd Search in Google Scholar

39. Ketokivi, M., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2017). Reasoning by analogy and the progress of theory, Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 637-658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5465/amr.2015.0322 Search in Google Scholar

40. Kotarbiński, T. (1986). Medytacje o życiu godziwym. [Meditations on a decent life]. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

41. Kotarbiński, T. (1987). Pisma etyczne. [Ethical writings]. Wrocław: Ossolineum. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

42. Kowal, J. & Gwiazda-Sawicka, G. (2018). Mobbing as a problem in management ethics. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 12(5), 131-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.18778/1899-2226.21.5.11 Search in Google Scholar

43. Latimer, T. (2018). Against subsidiarity. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(3), 282-303. [CrossRef]10.1111/jopp.12147 Search in Google Scholar

44. Ledford, Jr., G.E. (2014). The changing landscape of employee rewards: Observations and prescriptions. Organizational Dynamics, 43, 168-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

45. Lima, R.P. (2018). BE penaliza desigualdade salarial. [BE penalizes wage inequality]. Expresso, 10. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

46. Łobocki, M. (1997). Spolegliwy opiekun a altruista. [Humanism-Praxeology-Pedagogy]. In Z. Wołek & A. Owoc (eds.). Humanizm – Prakseologia – Pedagogika (pp. 83-94). Zielona Góra: Stowarzyszenie Lubuskie. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

47. Lopes, A. & Correia, A.D. (2003). A problemática da confiança na gestão das relações laborais. Análise Social, XXXVIII(168), 841-849. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

48. Mączyński, J. (1998). Diagnozowanie partycypacji decyzyjnej. [Diagnosing decision participation]. Warszawa: IFiS PAN. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

49. Makowski, G. (2008). Korupcja jako problem społeczny. [Corruption as a social problem]. Warszawa: Trio. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

50. Malos, S. (2015). Overt Stereotype Biases and Discrimination in the Workplace: Why Haven’t We Fixed This by Now? Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 27, 271-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10672-015-9264-7 Search in Google Scholar

51. Maquiavel (1994). O Príncipe. A Arte da Guerra. [The prince. The art of war]. Amadora: Ediclube. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

52. Melé, D. (2005). Exploring the Principle of Subsidiarity in Organisational Forms. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 293-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10551-005-0136-1 Search in Google Scholar

53. Michaelson, C. (2015). Executive Compensation and Moral Luck. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 34(2), 237-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5840/bpej2015111735 Search in Google Scholar

54. Mostert, E. (2015). Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibilities. Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 123-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.008 Search in Google Scholar

55. Newton, K. (2004). Social trust: individual and cross-national approaches. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 15-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1386/pjss.3.1.15/0 Search in Google Scholar

56. O’Fallon, M.J. & Butterfield, K.D. (2005). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Decision making Literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7 Search in Google Scholar

57. O’Loughlin, K., Kendig, H., Hussain, R., & Cannon, L. (2017). Ageism Feature. Age discrimination in the workplace: The more things change. Australian Journal on Ageing, 36(2), 98-101. [CrossRef] Search in Google Scholar

58. Ossowska, M. (1949/2002). Motywy postępowania: z zagadnień psychologii moralności. [Motives of conduct: from the issues of the psychology of morality]. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

59. Ossowska, M. (1970/85). Normy moralne: próba systematyzacji. [Moral norms: an attempt at systematization]. Warszawa: PWN. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

60. Pendola, A. (2019). Levinas, bureaucracy, and the ethics of school leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1528-1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/00131857.2019.1585241 Search in Google Scholar

61. Pereira, C.A. (2015). OCDE: Desigualdade entre ricos e pobres em máximos de 30 anos trava crescimento. [OECD: Inequality between rich and poor at 30-year highs holds back growth]. Jornal de Negócios. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

62. Pimenova, O. (2016). Subsidiarity as a ‘regulation principle’ in the EU. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 4(3), 381-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/20508840.2016.1290570 Search in Google Scholar

63. Pszczołowski, T. (1964). Prakseologiczny punkt widzenia w badaniu pracy. [Praxeological point of view in the study of work]. Materiały Prakseologiczne, 8, 5-18. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

64. Pszczołowski, T. (1978). Orgnizacja od dołu i od góry. [Organization from below and above]. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

65. Radzka, B. (2012). Kultura organizacyjna a mobbing. [Organizational culture and mobbing]. In T. Wyka & C. Szmidt (eds.). Wieloaspektowość mobbingu w stosunkach pracy (pp. 31-55). Warszawa: Poltext. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

66. Rego, A., Cunha, M.P., Costa, N.G., Gonçalves, H., & Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2007). Gestão ética e socialmente responsável: teoria e prática. [Ethical and socially responsible management: theory and practice]. Lisboa: Editora RH. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

67. Roque, A. (2017). Educação: Igreja lembra ao Estado princípio da subsidiariedade. [Education: Church reminds the State of subsidiarity principle]. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

68. Sison, A.J.G. & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5840/beq201222218 Search in Google Scholar

69. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 Search in Google Scholar

70. Sousa, L. (2011). Corrupção. [Corruption]. Lisboa: FFMS. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

71. Sullivan, L.S. & Niker, F. (2018). Relational autonomy, paternalism, and maternalism. Ethic Theory and Moral Practice, 21, 649-667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10677-018-9900-z Search in Google Scholar

72. Szmidt, C. (2012). Mobbing – istota, przyczyny i skutki. [Mobbing - the essence, causes and effects]. In T. Wyka & C. Szmidt (eds.). Wieloaspektowość mobbingu w stosunkach pracy (pp. 15-30). Warszawa: Poltext. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

73. Taylor, F.W. (1972). Badanie czasu pracy, praca akordowa i przodujący robotnik. [Working time research, piecework and a leading worker]. In Jerzy Kurnal (ed.). Twórcy naukowych podstaw organizacji (pp. 43-53). Warszawa: PWE. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

74. Taylor, F.W. (1972a). Zasady naukowego zarządzania. [Principles of scientific management]. In Jerzy Kurnal (ed.). Twórcy naukowych podstaw organizacji (pp. 54-87). Warszawa: PWE. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

75. Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534-544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5465/amj.2016.5001 Search in Google Scholar

76. Warren, R.C. (1999). Against paternalism in Human Resource Management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 50-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1111/1467-8608.00125 Search in Google Scholar

77. Weitzenfeld, J.S. (1984). Valid reasoning by analogy. Philosophy of Science, 51(1), 137-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1086/289169 Search in Google Scholar

78. Whittington, J.L. & Gerloff, E.A. (2000). Saindo da selva das teorias de gestão: Uma revisão e nova síntese. [Coming out of the jungle of management theories: A review and new synthesis]. In M.P. Cunha (ed.), Teoria organizacional: perspectivas e prospectivas (pp. 421-435). Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

79. Woleński, J. & Hartman, J. (2008). Wiedza o etyce. [Knowledge of ethics]. Warszawa – Bielsko-Biała: Wydawnictwo Szkolne PWN. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

80. Yunus, M. (2004). The Micro-credit Movement: Experiences and Perspectives. In M.C. Arruda & G. Enderle (eds.). Improving Globalization (pp. 15-33). Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV. [Google Scholar] Search in Google Scholar

81. Zieleniewski, J. (1969/79). Organizacja i zarządzanie. [Organization and management]. Warszawa: PWN. Available at: [Link] Search in Google Scholar

82. Zurita, M.L.M., Cook, B., Harms, L., & March, A. (2015). Towards new disaster governance: Subsidiarity as a critical tool. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 386-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1002/eet.1681 Search in Google Scholar