[
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–515.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2006). Privacy and rationality. In K. J. Strandburg & D. S. Raicu (Eds.), Privacy and technologies of identity. A cross-disciplinary conversation (pp. 15–29). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. R., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442–492.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arfan, M., & Khan, R. (2017). Ordinal logit and multilevel ordinal logit models: An application on wealth Index MICS-Survey Data. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 13(1), 211–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ashworth, L., & Free, C. (2006). Marketing dataveillance and digital privacy: Using theories of justice to understand consumers’ online privacy concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 107–123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Askar, M. A. E., Aboutabl, A. E., & Galal, A. (2022). Utilizing social media data analytics to enhance banking services. Intelligent Information Management, 14, 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2018). Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 150–159.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balaban, D., & Mustățea, M. (2021). Privacy concerns in mobile communication. A user’s perspective. Philobiblon, 26, 101–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barth, S., & De Jong, M. (2017). The privacy paradox—investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior—a systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batrinca, B., & Treleaven, P. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools and platforms. AI & Society, 30(1), 89–116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Behrendt, H., & Loh, W. (2022). Informed consent and algorithmic discrimination—is giving away your data the new vulnerable? Review of Social Economy, 80(1), 58–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bejger, S., & Elster, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in economic decision making: How to assure a trust? Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 19(3), 411–434.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belanger, F., & Crossler, R. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1041.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Betzing, J. H., Tietz, M., vom Brocke, J., & Becker, J. (2020). The impact of transparency on mobile privacy decision making. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 607–625.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, Y., Yee, G., Gu, Y., & Lung, Ch. H. (2020). Threats to online advertising and countermeasures: A technical survey. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 1(2), 1–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2020). Transforming paradigms. A global AI in financial services survey. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-ccaf-ai-in-financial-services-survey.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chai, S. (2020). Does cultural difference matter on social media? An examination of the ethical culture and information privacy concerns. Sustainability, 12(19), 8286.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chai, S., & Kim, M. (2012). A socio-technical approach to knowledge contribution behavior: An empirical investigation of social networking sites users. International Journal of Information Management, 32(2), 118–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, H. T., & Chen, W. (2015). Couldn’t or wouldn’t? The influence of privacy concerns and self-efficacy in privacy management on privacy protection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(1), 13–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheung, C., Lee, Z. W., & Chan, T. K. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence. Internet Research, 25(2), 279–299.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chowdhury, R. M. M. (2019). The moral foundations of consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 585–601.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cottrell, A., & Lucchetti, R. (2014). Gretl user’s guide. Gnu regression, econometrics and time-series library. https://www.academia.edu/31887034/Gretl_Users_Guide_Gnu_Regression_Econometrics_and_Time_series_Library
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Credit Suisse. (2020). Data protection information. https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/private-banking/docs/uk/data-privacy-policy.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culnan, M. J., & Bies, R. J. (2003). Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 323–342.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive on privacy and electronic communications. (2002). Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0058&from=EN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du, J., Kerkhof, P., & Van Koningsbruggen, G. M. (2019). Predictors of social media self-control failure: immediate gratifications, habitual checking, ubiquity, and notifications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(7), 477–485.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2017). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the respect for private life and the protection of personal data in electronic communications and repealing Directive 2002/58/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017PC0010&from=EN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L0843&from=EN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fife, E., & Orjuela, J. (2012). The privacy calculus: Mobile apps and user perceptions of privacy and security. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4, 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Financial Stability Board. (2017, November 1). Artificial Intelligence and machine learning in financial services. https://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financial-service/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flender, C., & Müller, G. (2012). Type indeterminacy in privacy decisions: the privacy paradox revisited. In J. Busemeyer, F. Dubois, A. Lambert-Mogiliansky & M. Melucci (Eds.), Quantum interaction. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 148–159). Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Floridi, L. (2006). Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(3), 109–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2083), 20160360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Framework Directive. (2002). Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0021&from=pl
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gancarczyk, M., Łasak, P., & Gancarczyk, J. (2022). The fintech transformation of banking: Governance dynamics and socio-economic outcomes in spatial contexts. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(3), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). (2016). Regulation (Eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giza, W., & Wilk, B. (2021). Revolution 4.0 and its implications for consumer behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hacker, P. (2021). A legal framework for AI training data—from first principles to the Artificial Intelligence Act. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(2), 257–301.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI ethics: A review of the social impacts and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence. ArXiv, 1907.07892. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.07892
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasal, M., Nowaková, J., Saghair, K. A., Abdulla, H., Snášel, V., & Ogiela, L. (2021). Chatbots: Security, privacy, data protection, and social aspects. Concurrency and Computation. Practice and Experience, 33(1), e6426.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, Q., & Ma, S. (2010). Does privacy still matter in the era of web 2.0? A qualitative study of user behavior towards online social networking activities. PACIS, 2, 591–602.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keith, M. J., Thompson, S. C., Hale, J., Lowry, P. B., & Greer, Ch. (2013). Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(12), 1163–1173.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirakosyan, K. (2015). Social media usage in banking industry and its managerial view: Case study for Mexican banking system. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 2(1), 34–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korol, T., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2022). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in forecasting the risk of personal bankruptcies in Poland and Taiwan. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 407–438.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loh, W. (2018). A practice-theoretical account of privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(2), 233–247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margulis, S. T. (2003). Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 243–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. (2011). Information technology and privacy: conceptual muddles or privacy vacuums? Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 267–284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. (2016). Understanding privacy online: development of a social contract approach to privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 551–569.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, K. (2019). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835–850.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGuinness, D. M., & Simon, A. (2018). Information disclosure, privacy behaviours, and attitudes regarding employer surveillance of social networking sites. IFLA Journal, 44(3), 203–222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millar, J. (2017). Ethics settings for autonomous vehicles. In P. Lin, R. Jenkins & K. Abney (Eds.), Robot ethics 2.0. From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence (pp. 20–34). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Misselhorn, C. (2018). Artificial morality. Concepts, issues and challenges. Society, 55(2), 161–169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muhammad, S. S., Dey, B. L., Syed Alwi, S. F., Kamal, M. M., & Asaad, Y. (2022), Consumers’ willingness to share digital footprints on social media: The role of affective trust. Information Technology & People, 36(2), 595–625.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muhammad, S. S., Dey, B. L., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Analysis of factors that influence customers’ willingness to leave big data digital footprints on social media: A systematic review of literature. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 559–576.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muravyeva, E., Janssen, J., Specht, M., & Custers, B. (2020). Exploring solutions to the privacy paradox in the context of e-assessment: Informed consent revisited. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(3), 223–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mutimukwe, Ch., Kolkowska, E., & Grönlund, Å. (2019). Information privacy in e-service: Effect of organizational privacy assurances on individual privacy concerns, perceptions, trust and self-disclosure behavior. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101413.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, T., & Dang, T. (2019). Privacy preserving biometric-based remote authentication with secure processing unit on untrusted server. IET Biometrics, 8(1), 79–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, privacy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Obar, J., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2020). The biggest lie on the internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 128–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, machine learning and big data in finance: opportunities, challenges, and implications for policy makers. https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parusheva, S. (2017). Social media banking models: A case study of a practical implementation in banking sector. Economic Studies, 3, 125–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Payment Services Directive 2. (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015L2366&from=PL
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., & Chen, Y. (2016). Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 409–419.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piotrowska, A. I., Polasik, M., & Piotrowski, D. (2017). Prospects for the application of biometrics in the Polish banking sector. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3), 501–518.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piotrowski, D. (2022). Consumer perceived ethicality of banks in the era of digitalisation: The case of Poland. Economics and Business Review, 22(1), 90–114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollach, I. (2005). A typology of communicative strategies in online privacy policies: Ethics, power and informed consent. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 221–235.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Recast. (2018). Directive 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L1972
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1027–1041.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodrigues, A., Ferreira, F., Teixeira, F., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101616.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roessler, B. (2015). Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy. In B. Roessler & D. Mokrosinska (Eds.), Social dimensions of privacy: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 141–161). Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Royakkers, L., Timmer, J., Kool, L., & Est, R. (2018). Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(2), 127–142.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarathy, R., & Robertson, C. J. (2003). Strategic and ethical considerations in managing digital privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 111–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shadbolt, N., & Hampson, R. (2018). The digital ape: How to live (in peace) with smart machines. Scribe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880–1903.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steppe, R. (2017). Online price discrimination and personal data: A General Data Protection Regulation perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(6), 768–785.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stutzman, F., Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2013). Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 4(2), 7–41. Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2013). Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11, 239–273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toti, J. F., Diallo, M. F., & Huaman-Ramirez, R. (2021). Ethical sensitivity in consumers’ decision-making: The mediating and moderating role of internal locus of control. Journal of Business Research, 131, 168–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trivedi, N., Asamoah, D. A., & Doran, D. (2018). Keep the conversations going: Engagement-based consumer segmentation on online social service platforms. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(2), 239–257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waliszewski, K., & Zięba-Szklarska, M. (2020). Robo-advisors as automated personal financial planners—SWOT analysis. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 3(27), 155–173.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wernaart, B. (2021). Developing a roadmap for the moral programming of smart technology. Technology in Society, 64(10), 101466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wottrich, V. M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Smit, E. G. (2019). App users unwittingly in the spotlight: A model of privacy protection in mobile apps. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(3), 1056–1083.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie, W., & Karan, K. (2019). Consumers’ privacy concern and privacy protection on social network sites in the era of big data: Empirical evidence from college students. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(3), 187–201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yamin, M. (2019). Information technologies of 21st century and their impact on the society. International Journal of Information Technology, 11(4), 759–766.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yee, G. O. M. (2017). Visualization and prioritization of privacy risks in software systems. International Journal on Advances in Security, 10(1&2), 14–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Poort, J. (2017). Online price discrimination and EU data privacy law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40(3), 347–366.
]Search in Google Scholar