This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
American Society of Hematology. Bleeding Disorders. Available from: https://www.hematology.org/Patients/Bleeding.aspx (accessed 5 November 2019).American Society of HematologyAvailable from: https://www.hematology.org/Patients/Bleeding.aspx (accessed 5 November 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Hemophilia 2020; 26(Suppl 6):1–158. doi: 10.1111/hae.14046.SrivastavaASantagostinoEDougallAWFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition202026Suppl 6115810.1111/hae.14046Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Peyvandi F, Tavakkoli F, Frame D, et al. Burden of mild haemophilia A: Systematic literature review. Haemophilia. 2019; 25(5): 755–763. doi.org/10.1111/hae.13777.PeyvandiFTavakkoliFFrameDBurden of mild haemophilia A: Systematic literature review2019255755763doi.org/10.1111/hae.13777.10.1111/hae.13777Search in Google Scholar
Benson G, Auerswalkd G, Dolan G, et al. Diagnosis and care of patients with mild haemophilia: practical recommendations for clinical management. Blood Transfus 2018; 16(1): 535–44. doi: 10.2450/2017.0150-17.BensonGAuerswalkdGDolanGDiagnosis and care of patients with mild haemophilia: practical recommendations for clinical management20181615354410.2450/2017.0150-17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Byams VR, Anderson BL, Grant AM, et al. Evaluation of bleeding disorders in women with menorrhagia: a survey of obstetrician gynecologists. Am J Obstet. Gynecol 2012; 207: 269.e1–269.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.010.ByamsVRAndersonBLGrantAMEvaluation of bleeding disorders in women with menorrhagia: a survey of obstetrician gynecologists2012207269.e1269.e510.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2001; 17:991–9. doi:10.1023/A:1020016922473.KorkeilaKSuominenSAhvenainenJNon-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey200117991910.1023/A:1020016922473Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Silva MS, Smith WT, Bammer G. Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56(2):115–118. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.115.SilvaMSSmithWTBammerGTelephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys200256211511810.1136/jech.56.2.115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(10):1129–36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1.AschDAJedrziewskiMKChristakisNAResponse rates to mail surveys published in medical journals1997501011293610.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saxena K. Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia. J Blood Med 2013; 4: 49–56. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S43734.SaxenaKBarriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia20134495610.2147/JBM.S43734366013323700376Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kulkarni R. Use of telehealth in the delivery of comprehensive care for patients with haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2018; 24(1): 33–42. doi: 10.1111/hae.13364.KulkarniRUse of telehealth in the delivery of comprehensive care for patients with haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders2018241334210.1111/hae.1336429205699Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nazzaro AM, Owens S, Hoots WK, Larson KL. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of youths in the US hemophilia population: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1618–1622. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075234.NazzaroAMOwensSHootsWKLarsonKLKnowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of youths in the US hemophilia population: results of a national survey2006961618162210.2105/AJPH.2005.075234155196616873741Open DOISearch in Google Scholar