This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Buettner S, van Vugt JL, IJzermans JN, Groot Koerkamp B: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10: 1131–1142. doi: 10.2147/ott.s93629.BuettnerSvan VugtJLIJzermansJNGroot KoerkampBIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current perspectives2017101131114210.2147/ott.s93629Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Serra C, Righi S, Molo CD, Felicani C: Current role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol Gastroint Dis 2015; 1: 102. doi: 10.4172/2475-3181.1000102.SerraCRighiSMoloCDFelicaniCCurrent role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma2015110210.4172/2475-3181.1000102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Loria F, Loria G, Basile S, Crea G, Frosina L, Frosina F: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of vascularization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res 2016; 2: 316–322. doi: 10.20517/2394-5079.2016.27.LoriaFLoriaGBasileSCreaGFrosinaLFrosinaFRole of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of vascularization of hepatocellular carcinoma2016231632210.20517/2394-5079.2016.27Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Loria F, Parlati A, Loria G, Frosina L, Crea G, Basile S et al.: Role of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of HCC in cirrhotic liver. Hepatoma Res 2018; 4: 59. doi: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.75.LoriaFParlatiALoriaGFrosinaLCreaGBasileSRole of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of HCC in cirrhotic liver201845910.20517/2394-5079.2018.75Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI, Cosgrove DO, Kudo M, Nolsøe CP et al.: Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012. A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 187–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.002.ClaudonMDietrichCFChoiBICosgroveDOKudoMNolsøeCPGuidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012. A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS20133918721010.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cosgrove D, Harvey C.: Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47: 813–826. doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0434-3.CosgroveDHarveyC.Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment20094781382610.1007/s11517-009-0434-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F et al.: Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 28–44. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963785.ClaudonMCosgroveDAlbrechtTBolondiLBosioMCalliadaFGuidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008200829284410.1055/s-2007-963785Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Simpson DH, Chin CT, Burns PN: Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans on Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999; 46: 372–382. doi: 10.1109/58.753026.SimpsonDHChinCTBurnsPNPulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents19994637238210.1109/58.753026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, Köster J, Pohl C, Burns P et al.: Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography 1999; 16: 799–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1999.tb00132.x.TiemannKLohmeierSKuntzSKösterJPohlCBurnsPReal-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging19991679980910.1111/j.1540-8175.1999.tb00132.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Averkiou M, Powers J, Skyba D, Bruce M, Jensen S: Ultrasound contrast imaging research. Ultrasound Q 2003; 19: 27–37. doi: 10.1097/00013644-200303000-00004.AverkiouMPowersJSkybaDBruceMJensenSUltrasound contrast imaging research200319273710.1097/00013644-200303000-00004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Szabo T: Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Academic Press, Amsterdam 2004.SzaboTAcademic PressAmsterdam2004Search in Google Scholar
Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Greis C: Pitfalls and arte-facts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 350–356. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245851.DietrichCFIgneeAHockeMSchreiber-DietrichDGreisCPitfalls and arte-facts using contrast enhanced ultrasound20114935035610.1055/s-0029-1245851Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Busilacchi P, Rapaccini Idelson-Gnocchi GL (eds): Ecografia clinica, Naples 2006.BusilacchiPRapaccini Idelson-GnocchiGL(eds)Naples2006Search in Google Scholar
Hu HT, Wang W, Chen LD, Ruan SM, Chen SL, Li X et al.: Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36: 2875–2883. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15522.HuHTWangWChenLDRuanSMChenSLLiXArtificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound2021362875288310.1111/jgh.15522Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Neumaier CE, Bertolotto M, Perrone R, Martinoli C, Loria F, Silvestri E: Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1995; 23: 173–178. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870230305.NeumaierCEBertolottoMPerroneRMartinoliCLoriaFSilvestriEStaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with ultrasound19952317317810.1002/jcu.1870230305Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chi Z, Bhalla A, Saeed O, Cheng L, Curless K, Wang HL et al.: Mucinous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a distinct variant. Hum Pathol 2018; 78: 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.010.ChiZBhallaASaeedOChengLCurlessKWangHLMucinous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a distinct variant20187813113710.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Loria F, Loria G, Basile S, Crea G, Randazzo D, Frosina L: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between enhancement pattern and cellular differentiation on histopathlogy. Updates Surg 2012; 64: 247–255. doi: 10.1007/s13304-012-0179-7.LoriaFLoriaGBasileSCreaGRandazzoDFrosinaLContrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between enhancement pattern and cellular differentiation on histopathlogy20126424725510.1007/s13304-012-0179-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ainora ME, Cerrito L, Liguori A, Mignini I, De Luca A, Galasso L et al.: Multiparametric dynamic ultrasound approach for differential diagnosis of primary liver tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 8548. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108548.AinoraMECerritoLLiguoriAMigniniIDe LucaAGalassoLMultiparametric dynamic ultrasound approach for differential diagnosis of primary liver tumors202324854810.3390/ijms24108548Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dong Y, Chen S, Möller K, Qiu YJ, Lu XY, Zhang Q et al.: Applications of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 2023; 49: 1780–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.03.026.DongYChenSMöllerKQiuYJLuXYZhangQApplications of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver2023491780178810.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.03.026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chammas MC, Bordini AL: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of malignant focal liver lesions. Ultrasonography 2022; 41: 4–24. doi: 10.14366/usg.21001.ChammasMCBordiniALContrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of malignant focal liver lesions20224142410.14366/usg.21001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
D’Onofrio M, Rozzanigo U, Masinielli BM, Caffari S, Zogno A, Malagò R et al.: Hypoechoic focal liver lesions: characterization with contrast enhanced ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33: 164–172. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20111.D’OnofrioMRozzanigoUMasinielliBMCaffariSZognoAMalagòRHypoechoic focal liver lesions: characterization with contrast enhanced ultrasonography20053316417210.1002/jcu.20111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen T, Chang X, Lv K, Wang Y, Fu X, Tan L et al.: Contrast-enhancement ultrasound features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a new perspective. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 19363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55857-6.ChenTChangXLvKWangYFuXTanLContrast-enhancement ultrasound features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a new perspective201991936310.1038/s41598-019-55857-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yuan MX, Li R, Zhang XH, Tang CL, Guo YL, Guo DY et al.: Factors affecting the enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on Contrast-enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) and their pathological correlations in patients with a single lesion. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 609–618. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399485.YuanMXLiRZhangXHTangCLGuoYLGuoDYFactors affecting the enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on Contrast-enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) and their pathological correlations in patients with a single lesion20163760961810.1055/s-0034-1399485Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jin C, Zhang XY, Li JW, Li C, Peng W, Wen TF et al.: Impact of tumor size and cirrhotic background for differentiating HCC and ICC with CEUS: does it matter for patients undergoing hepatectomy? Oncotarget 2017; 8: 83698–83711. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19624.JinCZhangXYLiJWLiCPengWWenTFImpact of tumor size and cirrhotic background for differentiating HCC and ICC with CEUS: does it matter for patients undergoing hepatectomy?20178836988371110.18632/oncotarget.19624Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu J, Sasaki M, Harada K, Sato Y, Ikeda H, Kim J et al.: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in chronic advanced liver disease and the cholangiocarcinomatous component of hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma share common phenotypes and cholangiocarcinogenesis. Histopathology 2011; 59: 1090–1099. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04058.x.XuJSasakiMHaradaKSatoYIkedaHKimJIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in chronic advanced liver disease and the cholangiocarcinomatous component of hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma share common phenotypes and cholangiocarcinogenesis2011591090109910.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04058.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sun D, Xu Z, Cao S, Wu H, Lu M, Xu Q et al.: Imaging features based on CT and MRI for predicting prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center study and meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging2023; 23: 56. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00576-5.SunDXuZCaoSWuHLuMXuQImaging features based on CT and MRI for predicting prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center study and meta-analysis2023235610.1186/s40644-023-00576-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frydrychowicz A, Lubner MG, Brown JJ, Merkle EM, Nagle SK, Rofsky NM et al.: Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35: 492–511. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22833.FrydrychowiczALubnerMGBrownJJMerkleEMNagleSKRofskyNMHepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents20123549251110.1002/jmri.22833Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu HX, Chen LD, Liu LN, Zhang YF, Guo LH, Liu C: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with pathological examination. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1029–1037. doi: 10.1259/bjr/21653786.XuHXChenLDLiuLNZhangYFGuoLHLiuCContrast-enhanced ultrasound of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with pathological examination2012851029103710.1259/bjr/21653786Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W, Schuler A, Dietrich C, von Herbay A et al.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions diagnostic accurancy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicentre trial). Ultraschell Med 2008; 29: 499–505. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027806.StrobelDSeitzKBlankWSchulerADietrichCvon HerbayAContrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions diagnostic accurancy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicentre trial)20082949950510.1055/s-2008-1027806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sporea I, Badea R, Martie A, Dumitru E, Ioaniţescu S, Şirli R et al.: Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of focal liver lesions in daily practice. A multicentre study. Med Ultrason 2012; 14: 95–100. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027806.SporeaIBadeaRMartieADumitruEIoaniţescuSŞirliRContrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of focal liver lesions in daily practice. A multicentre study2012149510010.1055/s-2008-1027806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W, Schuler A, Dietrich C, von Herbay A et al.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions diagnostic accurancy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicentre trial). Ultraschell Med 2008; 29: 499–505. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027806.StrobelDSeitzKBlankWSchulerADietrichCvon HerbayAContrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions diagnostic accurancy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicentre trial)20082949950510.1055/s-2008-1027806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dietrich CF, Kratzer W, Strobel D, Danse E, Fessl R, Bunk A et al.: Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus TC and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 1699–1705. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i11.1699.DietrichCFKratzerWStrobelDDanseEFesslRBunkAAssessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus TC and MRI2006121699170510.3748/wjg.v12.i11.1699Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sangiovanni A, Manini MA, Iavarone M, Romeo R, Forzenigo LV, Fraquelli M et al.: The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Gut 2010; 59: 638–644. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.187286.SangiovanniAManiniMAIavaroneMRomeoRForzenigoLVFraquelliMThe diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis20105963864410.1136/gut.2009.187286Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bruix J, Sherman M: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005; 41: 1208–1236. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933.BruixJShermanMManagement of hepatocellular carcinoma2005411208123610.1002/hep.20933Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vilana R, Forner A, Bianchi L, García-Criado A, Rimola J, de Lope CR et al.: Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Hepatology 2010; 51: 2020–2029. doi: 10.1002/hep.23600.VilanaRFornerABianchiLGarcía-CriadoARimolaJde LopeCRIntrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound2010512020202910.1002/hep.23600Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bruix J, Sherman M: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020–1022. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199.BruixJShermanMManagement of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update2011531020102210.1002/hep.24199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galassi M, Iavarone M, Rossi S, Bota S, Vavassori S, Rosa L et al.: Patterns of appearance and risk of misdiagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in cirrosi at contrast enhanced ultrasound. Liver Int 2013; 33: 771–779. doi: 10.1111/liv.12124.GalassiMIavaroneMRossiSBotaSVavassoriSRosaLPatterns of appearance and risk of misdiagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in cirrosi at contrast enhanced ultrasound20133377177910.1111/liv.12124Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: EASL-EORTC Clinical practice guidelines management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 908–943. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001.European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of CancerEASL-EORTC Clinical practice guidelines management of hepatocellular carcinoma20125690894310.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barreiros AP, Piscaglia F, Dietrich CF: Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): comments on AASLD guidelines. J Hepatol 2012; 57: 930–932. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.018.BarreirosAPPiscagliaFDietrichCFContrast enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): comments on AASLD guidelines20125793093210.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li R, Yuan M-X, Ma K-S, Li X-W, Tang C-L, Zhang X-H et al.: Detailed analysis of temporal features on contrast enhanced ultrasound may help differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e98612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098612.LiRYuanM-XMaK-SLiX-WTangC-LZhangX-HDetailed analysis of temporal features on contrast enhanced ultrasound may help differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis20149e9861210.1371/journal.pone.0098612Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
He C, Zhang Y, Song Y, Wang J, Xing K, Lin X et al.: Preoperative CEA levels are supplementary to CA19-9 levels in predicting prognosis in patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer 2018; 9: 3117–3128. doi: 10.7150/jca.25339.HeCZhangYSongYWangJXingKLinXPreoperative CEA levels are supplementary to CA19-9 levels in predicting prognosis in patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma201893117312810.7150/jca.25339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zong J, Fan Z, Zhang Y: Serum tumor markers for early diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2020; 7: 413–422. doi: 10.2147/jhc.s272762.ZongJFanZZhangYSerum tumor markers for early diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma2020741342210.2147/jhc.s272762Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu J, Bhayana D, Burak KW, Wilson SR: Resolution of indeterminate MRI with CEUS in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45: 123–133. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02181-2.HuJBhayanaDBurakKWWilsonSRResolution of indeterminate MRI with CEUS in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma20204512313310.1007/s00261-019-02181-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V et al.: Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46: 2579–2604. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030.DietrichCFNolsøeCPBarrRGBerzigottiABurnsPNCantisaniVGuidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS2020462579260410.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giorgio A, Gatti P, Montesarchio L, Santoro B, Dell’Olio A, Crucinio N et al.: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and thermal ablation: long-term results of an italian retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2019; 7: 287–292. doi: 10.14218/jcth.2019.00036.GiorgioAGattiPMontesarchioLSantoroBDell’OlioACrucinioNIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and thermal ablation: long-term results of an italian retrospective multicenter study2019728729210.14218/jcth.2019.00036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee MW, Choi D, Lee WJ et al.: Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors. J Hepatol 2013; 58: 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.020.KimYSLimHKRhimHLeeMWChoiDLeeWJTen-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors201358899710.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Loria F, Loria G, Crea G, Basile S, Frosina F, Messina F et al.: Vascolarizzazione dell’epatocarcinoma: ruolo della CEUS e della TC multifasica. Giornale Italiano Radiol Med 2014; 1; 961–967.LoriaFLoriaGCreaGBasileSFrosinaFMessinaFVascolarizzazione dell’epatocarcinoma: ruolo della CEUS e della TC multifasica20141961967Search in Google Scholar
Vidili G, Arru M, Solinas G, Calvisi DF, Meloni P, Sauchella A et al.: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28: 3488–3502. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488.VidiliGArruMSolinasGCalvisiDFMeloniPSauchellaAContrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis2022283488350210.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li J, Yu Y, He Q: The auxiliary diagnosis and imaging characteristics of mri combined with ct in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. J Oncol 2021; 2021: 2790958. doi: 10.1155/2021/2790958.LiJYuYHeQThe auxiliary diagnosis and imaging characteristics of mri combined with ct in patients with cholangiocarcinoma20212021279095810.1155/2021/2790958Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee SW, Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI et al.: Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 560–566. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0188-6.LeeSWKimHJParkJHParkDIChoYKSohnCIClinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for patients with gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma20104556056610.1007/s00535-009-0188-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim YY, Yeom SK, Shin H, Choi SH, Rhee H, Park JH et al.: Clinical staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Hepatol Commun 2021; 5: 2009–2018. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1774.KimYYYeomSKShinHChoiSHRheeHParkJHClinical staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging202152009201810.1002/hep4.1774Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nishioka E, Tsurusaki M, Kozuki R, Im S-W, Kono A, Kitajima K et al.: Comparison of conventional imaging and 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 2889. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112889.NishiokaETsurusakiMKozukiRImS-WKonoAKitajimaKComparison of conventional imaging and 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma202212288910.3390/diagnostics12112889Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petrowsky H, Wildbrett P, Husarik DB, Hany TF, Tam S, Jochum W et al.: Impact of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography on staging and management of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2006; 45: 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.03.009.PetrowskyHWildbrettPHusarikDBHanyTFTamSJochumWImpact of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography on staging and management of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma200645435010.1016/j.jhep.2006.03.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ke C, Yang T, Huang G, Gu C: Investigation of the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography and multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14: 1496–1503. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-1294.KeCYangTHuangGGuCInvestigation of the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography and multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma2023141496150310.21037/jgo-22-1294Open DOISearch in Google Scholar