Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS): A pictorial essay of common artifacts and benign and malignant pathology

1. Allajbeu I, Hickman SE, Payne N, Moyle P, Taylor K, Sharma N et al.: Automated breast ultrasound: technical aspects, impact on breast screening, and future perspectives. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2021; 13: 141–150. Allajbeu I, Hickman SE, Payne N, Moyle P, Taylor K, Sharma N et al.: Automated breast ultrasound: technical aspects, impact on breast screening, and future perspectives. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2021; 13: 141–150.10.1007/s12609-021-00423-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Van Zelst JCM, Mann RM: Automated three-dimensional breast US for screening: technique, artifacts, and lesion characterization. Radiogaphics 2018; 38: 663–683. Van Zelst JCM, Mann RM: Automated three-dimensional breast US for screening: technique, artifacts, and lesion characterization. Radiogaphics 2018; 38: 663–683.10.1148/rg.201817016229624482Search in Google Scholar

3. Karst I, Henley C, Gottschalk N, Floyd S, Mendelson EB: Three-dimensional automated breast US: facts and artifacts. Radiographics 2019; 39: 913–931. Karst I, Henley C, Gottschalk N, Floyd S, Mendelson EB: Three-dimensional automated breast US: facts and artifacts. Radiographics 2019; 39: 913–931.10.1148/rg.2019180104.presSearch in Google Scholar

4. Chae EY, Cha JH, Kim HH, Shin HJ: Comparison of lesion detection in the transverse and coronal views on automated breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 125–135. Chae EY, Cha JH, Kim HH, Shin HJ: Comparison of lesion detection in the transverse and coronal views on automated breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 125–135.10.7863/ultra.34.1.12525542948Search in Google Scholar

5. Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE et al.: Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 2015; 274: 663–673. Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE et al.: Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 2015; 274: 663–673.10.1148/radiol.1413283225329763Search in Google Scholar

6. Vourtsis A: Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: technical aspects and first results. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019; 100: 579–592. Vourtsis A: Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: technical aspects and first results. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019; 100: 579–592.10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.01230962169Search in Google Scholar

7. Rella R, Belli P, Giuliani M, Bufi E, Carlino G, Rinaldi P et al.: Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) in the screening and diagnostic setting: Indications and practical use. Acad Radiol 2018; 25: 1457–1470. Rella R, Belli P, Giuliani M, Bufi E, Carlino G, Rinaldi P et al.: Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) in the screening and diagnostic setting: Indications and practical use. Acad Radiol 2018; 25: 1457–1470.10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.01429555568Search in Google Scholar

8. Zheng FY, Yan LX, Huang BJ, Xia HS, Wang X, Lu Q et al.: Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2123–2129. Zheng FY, Yan LX, Huang BJ, Xia HS, Wang X, Lu Q et al.: Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2123–2129.10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.02826272029Search in Google Scholar

9. Boca I, Ciurea AI, Ciortea CA, Dudea SM: Personalized medicine pros and cons for automated breast ultrasound (ABUS): a narrative review. J Pers Med 2021; 11: 703. Boca I, Ciurea AI, Ciortea CA, Dudea SM: Personalized medicine pros and cons for automated breast ultrasound (ABUS): a narrative review. J Pers Med 2021; 11: 703.10.3390/jpm11080703840095234442347Search in Google Scholar

10. Vourtsis A, Kachulis A: The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 592–601. Vourtsis A, Kachulis A: The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 592–601.10.1007/s00330-017-5011-928828640Search in Google Scholar

11. Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K: Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1554–1563. Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K: Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1554–1563.10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.00427501888Search in Google Scholar

12. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K et al.: Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 229–237. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K et al.: Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 229–237.10.1056/NEJMoa04438316034008Search in Google Scholar

13. Arleo EK, Saleh M, Ionescu D, Drotman M, Min RJ, Hentel K: Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience. Clin Imaging 2014; 38: 439–444. Arleo EK, Saleh M, Ionescu D, Drotman M, Min RJ, Hentel K: Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience. Clin Imaging 2014; 38: 439–444.10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.03.01224768327Search in Google Scholar

14. Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K et al.: Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer 2006; 106: 732–742. Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K et al.: Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer 2006; 106: 732–742.10.1002/cncr.2165216411214Search in Google Scholar

15. Hogge JP, Robinson RE, Magnant CM, Zuurbier RA: The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. Radiographics 1995; 15: 1347–1356. Hogge JP, Robinson RE, Magnant CM, Zuurbier RA: The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. Radiographics 1995; 15: 1347–1356.10.1148/radiographics.15.6.85779618577961Search in Google Scholar

16. Bitencourt A, Ferreira E, Bastos D, Sperandio V, Graziano L, Guatelli C et al.: Intramammary lymph nodes: normal and abnormal multimodality imaging features. Br J Radiol 2019; 92: 20190517. Bitencourt A, Ferreira E, Bastos D, Sperandio V, Graziano L, Guatelli C et al.: Intramammary lymph nodes: normal and abnormal multimodality imaging features. Br J Radiol 2019; 92: 20190517.10.1259/bjr.20190517684967331322919Search in Google Scholar

17. Wen X, Cheng W: Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 94–101. Wen X, Cheng W: Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 94–101.10.1245/s10434-012-2590-122878621Search in Google Scholar

18. Fasih T, Jain M, Shrimankar J, Staunton M, Hubbard J, Griffith CDM: All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31: 1125– 1128. Fasih T, Jain M, Shrimankar J, Staunton M, Hubbard J, Griffith CDM: All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31: 1125–1128.10.1016/j.ejso.2005.04.00416024215Search in Google Scholar

19. Su A, Margolies L: Large subpectoral lipoma on screening mammography. J Radiol Case Rep 2017; 11: 22–27. Su A, Margolies L: Large subpectoral lipoma on screening mammography. J Radiol Case Rep 2017; 11: 22–27.10.3941/jrcr.v11i9.3098574314129299106Search in Google Scholar

20. Wanders JOP, Holland K, Veldhuis WB, Mann RM, Pijnappel RM, Peeters PHM et al.: Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162: 95–103. Wanders JOP, Holland K, Veldhuis WB, Mann RM, Pijnappel RM, Peeters PHM et al.: Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162: 95–103.10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7528841628012087Search in Google Scholar

21. Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, Fang L, Pang Y, Cheng AQ et al.: Comparative study of automated breast 3D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 1735–1742. Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, Fang L, Pang Y, Cheng AQ et al.: Comparative study of automated breast 3D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 1735–1742.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.04.00323849390Search in Google Scholar

22. Au-Yong ITH, Evans AJ, Taneja S, Rakha EA, Green AR, Paish C et al.: Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2342–2348. Au-Yong ITH, Evans AJ, Taneja S, Rakha EA, Green AR, Paish C et al.: Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2342–2348.10.1007/s00330-009-1418-219440719Search in Google Scholar

23. Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T, El-Khoury M, Meterissian S, Mesurolle B: Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 402–408. Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T, El-Khoury M, Meterissian S, Mesurolle B: Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 402–408.10.2214/AJR.11.737422915433Search in Google Scholar

24. Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E, Baker N, Lewis M, Ackerman S et al.: Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 284–290. Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E, Baker N, Lewis M, Ackerman S et al.: Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 284–290.10.2214/AJR.12.878123345347Search in Google Scholar

25. Louwman MWJ, Vriezen M, van Beek MWPM, Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert MCBJE, van der Sangen MJC, Roumen RM et al.: Uncommon breast tumors in perspective: incidence, treatment and survival in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 127–135. Louwman MWJ, Vriezen M, van Beek MWPM, Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert MCBJE, van der Sangen MJC, Roumen RM et al.: Uncommon breast tumors in perspective: incidence, treatment and survival in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 127–135.10.1002/ijc.2262517330844Search in Google Scholar

26. Jones KN, Magut M, Henrichsen TL, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Glazebrook KN: Pure lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as a hyperechoic mass: incidence and imaging characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 765–769. Jones KN, Magut M, Henrichsen TL, Boughey JC, Reynolds C, Glazebrook KN: Pure lobular carcinoma of the breast presenting as a hyperechoic mass: incidence and imaging characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 765–769.10.2214/AJR.12.974224147507Search in Google Scholar

27. Wang LC, Sullivan M, Du H, Feldman MI, Mendelson EB: US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 2013; 33: 213–228. Wang LC, Sullivan M, Du H, Feldman MI, Mendelson EB: US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 2013; 33: 213–228.10.1148/rg.33112509223322838Search in Google Scholar