Polish recommendations for lung ultrasound in internal medicine (POLLUS-IM)
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , y | 25 sept 2018
Acerca de este artículo
Article Category: review
Publicado en línea: 25 sept 2018
Páginas: 198 - 206
Recibido: 23 may 2018
Aceptado: 06 sept 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2018.0030
Palabras clave
© 2018 Natalia Buda et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Level of evidence
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experts’ opinion
| 1 | For | ≥ 80% |
| 2 | Against | ≤ 50% |
| 0 | Undecided | 51–79% |
Results of data credibility (level of evidence) and expert opinions for individual statements. N/A – not applicable
| The number of the statement | Level of evidence | Expert opinion | Strength of recommendations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A, B, C | I round | II round | III round | ||
| 1 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 2 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 3 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 4 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 5 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 6 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 7 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 8 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 9 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 10 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 11 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 12 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 13 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 14 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 15 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 16 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 17 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 18 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 19 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 20 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 21 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 22 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 23 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 24 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 25 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 26 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 27 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 28 | C | >80% | >80% | >80% | C1 |
| 29 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 30 | A | >80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 31 | A | >50% and <80% | >80% | >80% | A1 |
| 32 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 33 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 34 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 35 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 36 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 37 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
| 38 | N/A | >80% | >80% | >80% | N/A |
Strength of recommendations
| Opinion of the authors on the balance of beneficial and adverse effects of the intervention | Level of evidence | Strength of recommendation | Strength of recommendation – practical implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 1A | strong recommendation; a given procedure should be widely used as long as there are no strong contraindications |
| 1 | B | 1B | strong recommendation, but with less degree of certainty; probably right in most individual cases |
| 1 | C | 1C | the average strength of recommendation; the recommendation may change after obtaining more reliable data; probably right |
| 2 | A | 2A | the average strength of recommendation; the decision on its adoption is a matter of choice and may depend on local and individual conditions; intervention does not have to be used |
| 2 | B | 2B | weak recommendation; alternative conduct can be just as good or better |
| 2 | C | 2C | weak recommendation; alternative treatment is probably equally acceptable |