Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements of the suburethral tape location obtained in pelvic floor ultrasound performed with a transvaginal probe

1.Surkont G, Wlaźlak E, Kowalski A, Zdziennicki A, Suzin J: Ocena skuteczności kolposuspensji sposobem Burcha w zakresie leczenia wysił-kowego nietrzymania moczu (WNM) za pomocą diagramu CONSORT. Ginekol Pol 2006; 77: 463–467. Search in Google Scholar

2.Surkont G, Wlaźlak E, Kazimierak W, Dunicz-Sokołowska A, Suzin J: Efekty leczenia operacyjnego wysiłkowego nietrzymania moczu (WNM) za pomocą kolposuspensji sposobem Burcha oraz taśmy IVS oceniane przy użyciu różnych badań uroginekologicznych. Ginekol Pol 2007; 6: 460–463. Search in Google Scholar

3.Surkont G, Wlaźlak E, Stetkiewicz T, Sobczuk A, Krajewski P, Suzin J: Kolposuspensja zmodyfikowanym sposobem Burcha – kompleksowa ocena średnioterminowych wyników leczenia wysiłkowego nietrzymania moczu (WNM) u kobiet z zastosowaniem subiektywnych i obiektywnych metod diagnostycznych. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2005; 19: 29–35. Search in Google Scholar

4.Wieczorek A, Stankiewicz A, Santoro GA, Woźniak M, Bogusiewicz M, Rechberger T: Nowoczesne techniki ultrasonograficzne w diagnostyce dysfunkcji narządów miednicy mniejszej u kobiet. Ultrasonografia 2011; 45: 9–19. Search in Google Scholar

5.Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kolben S, Eberhard J, Hilgers R, Viereck V: Tape functionality: position, change in shape, and outcome after TVT procedure – mid-term results. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21: 795–800.10.1007/s00192-010-1119-z Search in Google Scholar

6.Dietz HP: Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1085–1097.10.1007/s00192-011-1402-7 Search in Google Scholar

7.Chantarasorn V, Shek K, Dietz HP: Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 493–498.10.1007/s00192-010-1306-y Search in Google Scholar

8.Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, Mellgren A, Sultan AH, Shobeiri SA et al.: State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 381–396.10.1002/uog.8816 Search in Google Scholar

9.Digesu GA, Calandrini N, Derpapas A, Gallo P, Ahmed S, Khullar V: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of female urethral sphincter using a translabial technique. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 1063–1068.10.1007/s00192-012-1669-3 Search in Google Scholar

10.Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 Search in Google Scholar

11.Wlaźlak E, Kociszewski J, Suzin J, Dresler M, Surkont G: Urethral length measurement in women during sonographic urethrocystography – an analysis of repeatability and reproducibility. J Ultrason 2016; 16: 25–31.10.15557/JoU.2016.0003483436827104000 Search in Google Scholar

12.Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbühler V, Hilgers R et al.: Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27: 485–490.10.1002/nau.2055618288705 Search in Google Scholar

13.Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Kuszka A, Eberhard J, Hilgers R, Viereck V: Can we place tension-free vaginal tape where it should be? The one-third rule. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 210–214.10.1002/uog.1005021793084 Search in Google Scholar

14.Viereck V, Kuszka A, Rautenberg O, Wlaźlak E, Surkont G, Hilgers R et al.: Do different vaginal tapes need different suburethral incisions? The one-half rule. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34: 741–746.10.1002/nau.2265825176293 Search in Google Scholar

15.Ward KL, Hilton P; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group: A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposu-spension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 324–331.10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.02914981369 Search in Google Scholar

16.Cetinel B, Demirkesen O, Onal B, Akkus E, Alan C, Can G: Are there any factors predicting the cure and complication rates of tension-free vaginal tape? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004; 15: 188–193.10.1007/s00192-004-1141-015167999 Search in Google Scholar

17.Dietz H, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD: How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 904–908.10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00198.x15453883 Search in Google Scholar

18.Wlaźlak E, Viereck V, Kociszewski J, Kuszka A, Rautenberg O, Walser C et al.: Role of intrinsic sphincter deficiency with and without urethral hypomobility on the outcome of tape insertion. Neurourol Urodyn 2017. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23211 [Epub ahead of print].10.1002/nau.2321128139863 Search in Google Scholar

19.Chene G, Cotte B, Tardieu AS, Savary D, Mansoor A: Clinical and ultrasonographic correlations following three surgical anti-incontinence procedures (TOT, TVT and TVT-O). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 1125–1131.10.1007/s00192-008-0593-z18373045 Search in Google Scholar

20.Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC, Tzeng CR: Correlation of tape location and tension with surgical outcome after transobturator suburethral tape procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 458–465.10.1002/uog.1008621919102 Search in Google Scholar

21.Dietz HP, Wilson PD: The ‘iris effect’: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand anti-incontinence procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 267–271.10.1002/uog.98515027016 Search in Google Scholar