This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Gleason BC, Hornick JL: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: where are we now? J Clin Pathol 2008; 61(4): 428–437.GleasonBCHornickJLInflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: where are we now?J Clin Pathol200861442843710.1136/jcp.2007.04938717938159Search in Google Scholar
Surabhi VR, Chua S, Patel RP, Takahashi N, Lalwani N, Prasad SR: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: current update. Radiol Clin North Am 2016; 54(3): 553–563.SurabhiVRChuaSPatelRPTakahashiNLalwaniNPrasadSRInflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: current updateRadiol Clin North Am201654355356310.1016/j.rcl.2015.12.00527153788Search in Google Scholar
Liang W, Lin S, Chen Z: Imaging findings of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor from the greater omentum: One case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(41): e8297.LiangWLinSChenZImaging findings of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor from the greater omentum: One case reportMedicine (Baltimore)20179641e829710.1097/MD.0000000000008297566232729019904Search in Google Scholar
Patnana M, Sevrukov AB, Elsayes KM, Viswanathan C, Lubner M, Menias CO: Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198(3): W217–227.PatnanaMSevrukovABElsayesKMViswanathanCLubnerMMeniasCOInflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimickerAm J Roentgenol20121983W21722710.2214/AJR.11.728822358018Search in Google Scholar
Dehner LP: The enigmatic inflammatory pseudotumours: the current state of our understanding, or misunderstanding. J Pathol 2000; 192(3): 277–229.DehnerLPThe enigmatic inflammatory pseudotumours: the current state of our understanding, or misunderstandingJ Pathol2000192327722910.1002/1096-9896(200011)192:3<277::AID-PATH749>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar
Schuessler G, Fellbaum C, Fauth F, Jacobi V, Schmidt-Matthiesen A, Ignee A, Dietrich CF: Der inflammatorische pseudotumor – eine schwierige Differenzialdiagnose. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 273–279.SchuesslerGFellbaumCFauthFJacobiVSchmidt-MatthiesenAIgneeADietrichCFDer inflammatorische pseudotumor – eine schwierige DifferenzialdiagnoseUltraschall Med20062727327910.1055/s-2005-858530Search in Google Scholar
Dietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2020; 46: 2579–2604.DietrichCFNolsoeCPBarrRGBerzigottiABurnsPNCantisaniVet alGuidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUSUltrasound Med Biol2020462579260410.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030Search in Google Scholar
Trenker C, Dietrich CF, Ziegler E, Neesse A, Görg C: B-mode ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of histological confirmed omental lesions: retrospective analysis of n = 44 patients. Z Gastroenterol 2019; 57(8): 945–951.TrenkerCDietrichCFZieglerENeesseAGörgCB-mode ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of histological confirmed omental lesions: retrospective analysis of n = 44 patientsZ Gastroenterol201957894595110.1055/a-0893-6872Search in Google Scholar
Görg C, Egbring J, Bert T: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of epiploic appendagitis Ultraschall Med 2009; 30(2): 163–167.GörgCEgbringJBertTContrast-enhanced ultrasound of epiploic appendagitis Ultraschall Med200930216316710.1055/s-2008-1027891Search in Google Scholar