[
Ashcroft, R. E. (2013). Doing good by stealth: Comments on “Salvaging the concept of nudge”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(8), 494. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Assaf Shwartz, Maya Tzunz, Lee Gafter, Agathe Colléony, One size does not fit all: The complex relationship between biodiversity and psychological well-being, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 86, 2023, 128008, ISSN 1618-8667, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berkes, F. (2004). “Rethinking Community-Based Conservation.” Conservation Biology, 18(3), pp. 621-630.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bibiana Giudice da Silva Cezar, Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada Cognitive Overload, Anxiety, Cognitive Fatigue, Avoidance Behavior and Data Literacy in Big Data environments, Information Processing & Management, Volume 60, Issue 6, 2023, 103482, ISSN 0306-4573, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103482.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biodiversa. https://www.biodiversa.eu/ (accessed on 4 August 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biodiversity Information System for Europe. https://biodiversity.europa.eu/ (accessed on 5 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brockett, Callum & Woolaston, Katie & Deane, Felicity & Humphries, Fran & Kumar, Ethan & Kennedy, Amanda & Bell-James, Justine. (2023). Best Practice Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation Law and Policy. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction. 1. 1-20. 10.1017/ext.2023.14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broers, V. J. V., De Breucker, C., Van den Broucke, S., & Luminet, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. European Journal of Public Health, 27(5), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, L.H., Prike, T. & Ecker, U.K.H. Nudge-based misinformation interventions are effective in information environments with low misinformation prevalence. Sci Rep 14, 11495 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62286-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carla Almeida, José Azevedo, Adriana Fogel, Eduarda Lopes, Catarina Vale, Patrícia Padrão, Effectiveness of nudge interventions to promote fruit and vegetables’ selection, purchase, or consumption: A systematic review, Food Quality and Preference, Volume 116, 2024, 105122, ISSN 0950-3293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coad, L.; Leverington, F.; Knights, K.; Geldmann, J.; Eassom, A.; Kapos, V.; Kingston, N.; de Lima, M.; Zamora, C.; Cuardros, I.; et al. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: Current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dalton, D.T.; Berger, V.; Adams, V.; Botha, J.; Halloy, S.; Kirchmeir, H.; Sovinc, A.; Steinbauer, K.; Švara, V.; Jungmeier, M. A Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Monitoring Programs in Conservation Areas. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086779
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Jong, T. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instr Sci 38, 105–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doak, D.F.; Bakker, V.J.; Goldstein, B.E.; Hale, B. What is the future of conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 77–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Europarc Federation. https://www.europarc.org/european-policy/eu-biodiversity-strategy-protected-areas/eu-2030-biodiversity-strategy/ (accessed on 3 August 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eylering, Annike & Hölzl, Corinna & Fiebelkorn, Florian. (2024). Psychological factors affecting the perception of biodiversity loss: A comparative study in three European countries.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felsen, G., Castelo, N., & Reiner, P. B. (2013). Decisional enhancement and autonomy: Public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. Judgement and Decision Making, 8(3), 202–213. doi:10.1177/2332858416674007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferraro, G.; Failler, P. Biodiversity Conservation and the Role of Policy Resources: The Case of Saint Helena. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031250
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC198188/ (accessed on 2 August 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frank, A.S.K.; Schäffler, L. Identifying Key Knowledge Gaps to Better Protect Biodiversity and Simultaneously Secure Livelihoods in a Priority Conservation Area. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gavin, M.C.; McCarter, J.; Berkes, F.; Mead, A.T.P.; Sterling, E.J.; Tang, R.; Turner, N.J. Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061846
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grimm, M.; Köppel, J. Biodiversity Offset Program Design and Implementation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246903
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice a framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1, 3–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helen Kopnina, Scarlett Ruopiao Zhang, Sam Anthony, Abeer Hassan, Warren Maroun, The inclusion of biodiversity into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework: A strategic integration of ecocentric extinction accounting, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 351, 2024, 119808, ISSN 0301-4797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119808.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hooper, David & Chapin III, F Stuart & Ewel, J.J. & Hector, Andy & Inchausti, Pablo & Lavorel, Sandra & Lawton, J.H. & Lodge, David & Loreau, Michel & Naeem, Shahid & Schmid, Bernhard & Setälä, Heikki & Symstad, Amy & J.J., Vandermeer & Wardle, David. (2005). Effects Of Biodiversity On Ecosystem Functioning: A Consensus Of Current Knowledge. Ecological Monographs. 75. 3-35. 10.1890/04-0922.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hrabanski, M. The biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments in global governance: Origins, success and controversies. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 15, 143–151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Institute for European Environmental Policy. https://ieep.eu/eu-biodiversity-policy-and-instruments/ (accessed on 5 August 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johansson, Maria & Henningsson, Marianne. (2011). Social-Psychological Factors in Public Support for Local Biodiversity Conservation. Society and Natural Resources. 24. 717-733. 10.1080/08941920903530925.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kosters, M., & Van der Heijden, J. (2015). From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory. Evaluation, 21, 276–291. doi:10.1177/1356389015590218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kwan, Y.H.; Cheng, T.Y.; Yoon, S.; Ho, L.Y.C.; Huang, C.W.; Chew, E.H.; Thumboo, J.; Østbye, T.; Low, L.L. A Systematic Review of Nudge Theories and Strategies Used to Influence Adult Health Behaviour and Outcome in Diabetes Management. Diabetes Metab. 2020, 46, 450–460.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leadley, P.W.; Krug, C.B.; Alkemade, R.; Pereira, H.M.; Sumaila, U.R.; Walpole, M.; Marques, A.; Newbold, T.; Teh, L.S.L.; van Kolck, J.; et al. Progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: An Assessment of Biodiversity Trends, Policy Scenarios and Key Actions; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2014; Technical Series 78; 500p. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-78-en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Yiling & Osman, Magda & Ashcroft, Richard. (2017). Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39. 1-14. 10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mols, F., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Steffens, N. K. (2015).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parr, Catherine & Woinarski, John & Pienaar, Danie. (2009). Cornerstones of biodiversity conservation? Comparing the management effectiveness of Kruger and Kakadu National Parks, two key savanna reserves. Biodiversity and Conservation. 18. 3643-3662. 10.1007/s10531-009-9669-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson, I.; Maron, M.; Moillanen, A.; Bekessy, S.; Gordon, A. A quantitative framework for evaluating the impact of biodiversity offset policies. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 224, 162–169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rode, Julian; Gómez-Baggethun, Erik; Krause, Torsten (2013): Economic incentives for biodiversity conservation: What is the evidence for motivation crowding?, UFZ Discussion Paper, No. 19/2013, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ), Leipzig
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryo Sakurai, Hiromi Kobori, Masako Nakamura, Takahiro Kikuchi, Factors influencing public participation in conservation activities in urban areas: A case study in Yokohama, Japan, Biological Conservation, Volume 184, 2015, Pages 424-430, ISSN 0006-3207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torres-Toukoumidis, Angel & Vintimilla-Leon, Diego & De-Santis, Andrea & López-López, Paulo Carlos. (2022). Gamification in Ecology-Oriented Mobile Applications—Typologies and Purposes. Societies. 12. 1-12. 10.3390/soc12020042.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TRUONG, DINH. (2022). Community awareness and participation in biodiversity conservation at Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Vietnam. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 23. 10.13057/biodiv/d230163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendel, Steve. (2016). Behavioral Nudges and Consumer Technology. 10.1007/978-3-319-31319-1_5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, Thomas & Petrovan, Silviu & Booth, Hollie & Correa, Roberto & Gatt, Yasmine & Martin, Phil & Newell, Helena & Worthington, Thomas & Sutherland, William. (2022). Determining the economic costs and benefits of conservation actions: A decision support framework. Conservation Science and Practice. 4. 10.1111/csp2.12840.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, Thomas. (2023). Understanding and improving the cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation. 10.17863/CAM.100259.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Why a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealth. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 195. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
World Wide Fund For Nature. https://www.wwf.eu/what_we_do/biodiversity/ (accessed on 1 August 2024)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, Yinglin & Xie, Ling & Huang, Shiang-Lin & Li, Ping & Yuan, Zengwei & Liu, Wenhua. (2018). Using social media to strengthen public awareness of wildlife conservation. Ocean and Coastal Management. 153. 76-83. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.12.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhirong Wang, Tongxin Wang, Xiujuan Zhang, Junbang Wang, Yongsheng Yang, Yu Sun, Xiaohua Guo, Qinghua Wu, Eugenie Nepovimova, Alan E. Watson, Kamil Kuca, Biodiversity conservation in the context of climate change: Facing challenges and management strategies, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 937, 2024, 173377, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zinngrebe, Y. Planning for Implementation: Shifting the Focus of National Biodiversity Strategies to Local Narratives, Existing Institutional Settings and Social Capital. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129774
]Search in Google Scholar
