[
Agyeman, J (2008) ‘Toward a ‘just’ sustainability?’ Continuum – Journal of Media and Cultural Studies Vol. 22, Issue 6 pp 751-757.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baranauskienė, J. (2015). Viešųjų investicijų projektų kuriamos socialinės naudos kompleksinis vertinimas. Doctoral dissertation, Aleksandro Stulginskio universitetas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bardal, K. G. (2020). Contradictory outcomes of cost-benefit analyses–Findings from Norwegian public-investment projects. Research in transportation economics, 82, 100874
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broniewicz, E., Ogrodnik, K. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 83, 102351.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, T. Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2), 1848–1861.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrovolskiene, N., Pozniak, A. (2021). Simple additive weighting versus technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution: Which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(4), 180–196.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eslami, V.; Ashofteh, P.-S.; Golfam, P.; Loáiciga, H.A. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Environmental Impact Assessment to Reduce the Adverse Effects of Dams. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 35, 4085–4110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Filatovas, E. (2012). Daugiakriterinių optimizavimo uždavinių sprendimas interaktyviuoju būdu, Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Florio, M., Morretta, V., Willak, W. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis and European Union cohesion policy: Economic versus financial returns in investment project appraisal. Journal of Bene-fit-Cost Analysis, 9(1), 147–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grierson, D. E., (2008). Pareto multi-criteria decision making. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(3), 371-384 Henke, I., Cartenì, A., Di Francesco, L. (2020). A sustainable evaluation processes for investments in the transport sector: A combined multi-criteria and cost–benefit analysis for a new highway in Italy. Sustainability, 12(23), 9 854.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Juričić, D.; Vašiček, D.; Drezgić, S. (2020). Multiple criteria decision analysis of public investment options: application to streetlighting renewal projects. Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 3 288-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopmans, C.; Mouter, N. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis. In Advances in Transport Policy and Planning (Vol. 6, pp. 1–42). Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liesen, A., Figge, F., Hahn, T. (2013). Net Present Sustainable Value: A value-based approach to sustainable investment appraisal. Liesen, A., Figge, F., & Hahn, 175–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Nor, K. M., (2015). Application of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(5), 1034-1068.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miranda, J., Tereso, A., Teixeira, J. C. (2021). Multicriteria analysis as a better tool for the selection of public projects alternatives. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 545–552.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nooij, M. (2011). Social cost-benefitanalysis of electricity interconnector investment: A critical appraisal. Energy Policy. 39, p. 3096–3105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oželienė, d., Drejeris, R., (2015). Įmonių darnios plėtros vertinimo metodinio potencialo analizė. Mokslas Lietuvos ateitis, 7(2), 189-198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearce, D. W., Atkinson, G, Mourato, S. (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments. Paris: Organ. Econ. Co-Op. Dev
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Puspa, M. (2019). Decision Support System for Supplementary Food Recipients (PMT) By Using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method. Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T Medicom, 11(2), 37–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., (2012). Models methods concepts end applications of the analitic hierarchy process. Springer Science & Business Media, 175.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schieg, M. (2009). Model for integrated project management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 149–160.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomaševič, V., (2010). Investicinių projektų efektyvumo vertinimas grynosios dabartinės vertės metodu. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 11(4), 362-369.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valiulė V., Zonienė, A. (2019). Tvarių investicijų vertinimo koncepcija. Regional Formation & Development Studies, 27(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Volden, G. H. (2019). Assessing public projects’ value for money: An empirical study of the use-fulness of cost– benefit analyses in decision-making. International Journal of Project Management, 37(4), 549–564.
]Search in Google Scholar
