[Elek, B. 2007. Influencing the Confession in the Criminal Procedure. Debrecen: Toth K¨onyvkeresked´es ´es Kiado Kft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elek, B. 2014. Connections between judicial conviction and the statement of facts. in: Jura 2014 XX./1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papp, F. 1977. On the words of the explanatory dictionary with the most meanings. In: Hungarian Language Today. Borb´ala Keszler (ed.) Budapest: Tank¨onyvkiado.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tremmel, F. 2006. Evidence in Criminal Procedure. Budapest-P´ecs: Dialog Campus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gudykunst, W. B. 2003. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks (CA).]Search in Google Scholar
[González, R. D. 1994. The Federal Court Interpreter Certification Project: Defining World Class Standards for Court Interpretation. (Proceedings of IJET 4, Brisbane, University of Queensland) IN: GAMAL, Muhammad (1998): Court Interpreting. In: Baker, Mone (eds.) Routledge Encyclopaedia of Translation Studies. London/New York, Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövágó, G. 2009. The Theoretical and Practical Basics of Communication. Aula.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, E. T. 1987. Hidden Dimensions. Budapest: Gondolat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horváth, I. 2012. Interpreter Behaviour. A Psychological Approach. Budapest: Hang Language School.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horváth, I. 2013. Court Interpretation. Budapest.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lempp, H. J. 2002. Means of Questioning Right. Psychotherapy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Joachim, H. 1993. The Reformation of Penal Procedure in Eastern and Western Europe. translated by: Endre Bocz. Hungarian Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Róka J. and Hochel S. (ed.) 2009. Intercultural and International Communication in The Globalised World. Budapest: Budapest College of Business and Communication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hidasi, J 2004. Intercultural Communication. Scolar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Balassa, L. 1977. The synonyms of the verb dawning and the depiction of dawn in literature. in: Hungarian Language Today. Borb´ala Keszler (ed.) Budapest: Tank¨onyvkiado.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neuliep, J. W. 2006. Intercultural Communication. A Contextual Approach. Thousand Oaks (CA).]Search in Google Scholar
[Végvári, R. 2005. Certain Questions of the English Penal Procedure. A Cross- Section. Szeged: President of the Advisory Board of the Elem´er Polay Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Samovar, L. A., and Porter, Richard E. - McDaniel, Erwin, R. 2007. Communication between Cultures. Belmont (CA).]Search in Google Scholar
[Toomey, T., and Stellan- Chung, Leeva, C. 2005. Understanding Intercultural Communication. Los Angeles (CA).]Search in Google Scholar