[
1. Stellingsma K, Slagter AP, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJA. Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant-retained overdentures: comparison of three types of treatment protocols. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:403–410.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01242.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Visser A, Geertman ME, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Kwakman JM, Creuger NHJ, Van Oort RP. Five years of aftercare of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:113–120.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00834.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Geertman ME, Slagter AP, Van’t Hof MA, Van Wass MAJ, Kalk W. Masticatory performance and chewing experience with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:7–13.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00353.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Comfort MB, Chu FCS, Chai J, Wat PYP, Chow TW. A 5-year prospective study on small diameter screwshaped oral implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:341–345.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01441.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Turkyilmaz I. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Branemark implants. J ClinPeriodontol. 2006;33:233–238.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00895.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:616–20.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00932.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone Density Assessments of Oral Implant Sites Using Computerized Tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:267–72.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Fyhrie DP. Summary – Measuring ‘‘bone quality’’. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005;5:318–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Bergkvist G, Koh KJ, Sahlholm S, Klintstrom E, Lindh C. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2010; 25: 321–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006; 2:124–35.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01356.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Marquezan M, Oso´rio A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2012; 23(7):767-74
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:211–20.10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[211:IZOTJI]2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventionalflapped surgery. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:835–40.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01772.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke w, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. “Relationship between cortical bone thicknessor computerized tomography-derived bone density values andimplant stability,”.Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010;21(6):612-17.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01880.x20666788
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2005; 20: 220–230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin- Periodontol 2007; 34: 716–22.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01112.x17635248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19:77–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6:48–57.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00027.x15595709
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:474–80.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x15248883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds.Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1985;199–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Norton RM, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12:79–84.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x11168274
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on surgical approach, and healing. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1999; 371–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. de Oliveira RC,Leles CR,Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF, “Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2008;105(2):231–38.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.00718230392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Turkyilmaz I, Aksoy U, McGlumphy EA. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10(4):231-7.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00084.x18384409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Fun LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, Fu KL, Shen YW, Tu MG, Shen WC. Hsu T.Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in differentregions of the jawbone Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010 37; 346–35110.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02061.x20113389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Almog DM, LaMar J, LaMar FR, LaMar F. Cone beam computerized tomographybased dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance, Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(2):77-81.10.1563/789.116704109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Barbato E. The accuracy of CBCT in measuring jaws bone density. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(10):1425-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Razi T, Niknami M, Ghazani FA. Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014; 8(2): 107–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Barbato E. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):471-8.10.1111/cid.1202723294461
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Wada M, Tsuiki Y, Suganami T, Ikebe K, Sogo M, Okuno I, Maeda Y. The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry (2015) 1:3.10.1186/s40729-014-0003-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Fuster-Torres MÁ, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha- Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(5):1051-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Oztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1016-21.10.1111/clr.12219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:439-49.10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70009-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Arnold F, West DC. Angiogenesis in wound healing. PharmacolTher 1991;52:407–22. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone implant interface. Biomaterials 1999;20:2311-21.10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Kuzyk PR, Schemitsch EH. The basic science of periimplant bone healing. Indian J Orthop 2011;45:108-15.10.4103/0019-5413.77129305111621430864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. GrgaDj, Dzeletovic B, Zivkovic S, Krsljak E. Blood Flow Measurement by Laser Doppler Method in Orofacial Region. Serbian Dental Journal.2010;57(3):141-48.10.2298/SGS1003141G
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Retzepi M, Tonetti M, Donos N. (2007) Comparison of gingival blood flow during healing of simplified papilla preservation and modified Widman flap surgery: a clinical trial using laser Doppler flowmetry. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2007; 34: 903-11.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01119.x17850609
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Mavropoulos A, Brodin P, Rösing CK, Aass AM, Aars H. Gingival blood flow in periodontitis patients before and after periodontal surgery assessed in smokers and non-smokers. Journal of Periodontology 2007; 78: 1774–82.10.1902/jop.2007.06047217760548
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Barta A, Nagy G, Csiki Z, Márton S, Madléna M. Changes in Gingival Blood Flow during Orthodontic Treatment. Cent Eur J Med 2010; 5(6) :758-65.10.2478/s11536-010-0043-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Singh DB, Stansby G, Harrison DK. Assessment of oxygenation and perfusion in the tongue and oral mucosa by visible spectrophotometry and laser Doppler flowmetry in healthy subjects. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2008; 614: 227–33.10.1007/978-0-387-74911-2_2618290333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Røe C, Damsgård E, Knardahl S. Reliability of bloodflux measurements from the upper trapezius muscle during muscle contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2008; 102: 497–503.10.1007/s00421-007-0610-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Kijsamanmith K, Timpawat S, Vongsavan N, Matthews B. Pulpal blood flow recorded from human premolar teeth with a laser Doppler flow meter using either red or infrared light.Archives of oral biology 2011; 56: 629-33.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Chen E, Goonewardene M, Abbott P. Monitoring dental pulp sensibility and blood flow in patients receiving mandibular orthognathic surgery. International Endodontic Journal 2012; 45:215–23.10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01964.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Verdonck HWD, Meijer GJ, Laurin T, Nieman FH, Stoll C, Riediger D, Stoelinga PJW, de Baat C. Assessment of vascularity in irradiated and non-irradiated maxillary and mandibular alveolar minipig bone using laser Doppler flowmetry. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2007; 22: 774–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Verdonck HWD, Meijer GJ, Kessler P, Nieman FH, de Baat C, Stoelinga PJW. Assessment of bone vascularity in the anterior mandible using laser Doppler flowmetry. Clin. Oral Impl. Res 2009; 20:140–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Monteiro AA, Svensson H, Bornmyr S, Arbolerius M, Kopp S. Comparison of ta3Xe clearance and laser dopplerflowmetry in assessment of blood flow changes in human masseter muscle induced by isometric contraction. Arch Oral Biol. 1989; 34:779-86.10.1016/0003-9969(89)90028-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Matsumoto K. Lasers in endodontics: a review. IntEndod J. 2000; 33:173-85.10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00280.x11307433
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Kokovic V, Krsljak E, Andric M, Brkovic B, Milicic B, Jurisic M, Rahman MM, Hämmerle CH. Correlation of bone vascularity in the posterior mandible and subsequent implant stability: a preliminary study. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(2):200-5.10.1097/ID.000000000000005724614879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Adam Shui-Cheong Siu, Frederick Cho-Shun Chu, Thomas Ka-Lun L, Tak-Wah Chow, Fei-Long Deng. Imaging modalities for preoperative assessment in dental implant therapy: an overview. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:23-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kurkcu M, Akoglan M, Oztunc H, Kurtoglu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25(9): 1016-2110.1111/clr.1221923772811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Boonsiriseth K., Suriyan N., Min K., Wongsirichat N. Bone and soft tissue healing in dental implantology. J. Med. Med. Sci.2014; 5(5):121-126
]Search in Google Scholar