<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The paper explores the role of competing notions of what does it mean to have a testament of the law of the past in Christian and Rabbinic corpora of text and thought. The argument probes and renegotiates the complex relationships of the Christian suspension of Old Testament by the New Testament and the Rabbinic suspension of (any) new testament in the two <italic>Talmudim</italic>. It consequently draws implications of that analysis for understanding the relationships of the two <italic>Talmudim</italic> to the tradition of hermeneutics of texts, as influenced as the latter has been by theological and literary approaches of various Christian theologies of the two Testaments. As a part of that analysis the articles justifies the task of advancing and providing a critique of political theology and political philology as modes of thought and investigation. That provides a way to ask anew the question about relationships between theology, literary theory, and political thought.</p></abstract>

The paper explores the role of competing notions of what does it mean to have a testament of the law of the past in Christian and Rabbinic corpora of text and thought. The argument probes and renegotiates the complex relationships of the Christian suspension of Old Testament by the New Testament and the Rabbinic suspension of (any) new testament in the two Talmudim. It consequently draws implications of that analysis for understanding the relationships of the two Talmudim to the tradition of hermeneutics of texts, as influenced as the latter has been by theological and literary approaches of various Christian theologies of the two Testaments. As a part of that analysis the articles justifies the task of advancing and providing a critique of political theology and political philology as modes of thought and investigation. That provides a way to ask anew the question about relationships between theology, literary theory, and political thought.

Suspending New Testament: Do the Two Talmuds Belong to Hermeneutics of Texts?

Studia Humana

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Suspending New Testament: Do the Two Talmuds Belong to Hermeneutics of Texts?"}

The paper explores the role of competing notions of what does it mean to have a testament of the law of the past in Christian and Rabbinic corpora of text and...

Suspending New Testament: Do the Two Talmuds Belong to Hermeneutics of Texts?

Publicado en línea: 22 ago 2017

Páginas: 46 - 64

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0011

Palabras clave
Old Testament, New Testament, Palestinian Talmud, Babylonian Talmud, theology, suspension, cancellation, hermeneutics of texts, literature, formal logic, Auerbach, Kafka, political philology, political theology, political thought, literary theory, critical theory

© 2017 Sergey Dolgopolski, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Suspending New Testament: Do the Two Talmuds Belong to Hermeneutics of Texts?

Publicado en línea: 22 ago 2017

Páginas: 46 - 64

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0011

Palabras claveOld Testament, New Testament, Palestinian Talmud, Babylonian Talmud, theology, suspension, cancellation, hermeneutics of texts, literature, formal logic, Auerbach, Kafka, political philology, political theology, political thought, literary theory, critical theory

© 2017 Sergey Dolgopolski, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Palabras clave
Old Testament, New Testament, Palestinian Talmud, Babylonian Talmud, theology, suspension, cancellation, hermeneutics of texts, literature, formal logic, Auerbach, Kafka, political philology, political theology, political thought, literary theory, critical theory