1. bookVolumen 64 (2015): Edición 1-6 (December 2015)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2509-8934
Primera edición
22 Feb 2016
Calendario de la edición
1 tiempo por año
Idiomas
Inglés
access type Acceso abierto

Genetic variation and origin of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) native and introduced provenances

Publicado en línea: 07 Jun 2017
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 64 (2015) - Edición 1-6 (December 2015)
Páginas: 33 - 46
Recibido: 04 Jun 2014
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2509-8934
Primera edición
22 Feb 2016
Calendario de la edición
1 tiempo por año
Idiomas
Inglés
Abstract

A total of 420 individuals belonged to 18 native teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) provenances from all four distributed countries and 10 introduced provenances were analyzed to for genetic variation, structure and genetic origin using SSR markers. The unbiased gene diversity for each provenance ranged from 0.4692 to 0.8523 with a mean value 0.6612, showing high variation within teak provenances and variation in India provenances was highest than in other countries’ provenances.

AMOVA analysis showed that the majority of variation existed within provenances (84.760%) and also substantial variation among countries (10.586%). As more as possible plus trees from large population should be selected or conserved in order to keep genetic variability for future improvement. Different countries populations should be preserved in the natural habitat or collected for ex site conservation with cooperation and region-wise strategies.

A Mantel test revealed significant correlation between genetic distances and geographic distances of teak provenances (R=0.7355, P<0.001). The cluster analyses by UPGMA, PCA and STRUCTURE methods gave very similar results, showing India provenances were firstly differentiated, and Laos provenances clustered with Thailand provenances, then introduced provenances and Myanmar provenances successively joined in the clusters. The introduced provenances no. 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27 and 28 appeared to be very closely linked to Laos provenances (especially no. 17) and Thailand provenances (especially no. 5 and 6), while provenances no. 21, 24, 26 may be originated from Myanmar provenance (especially no. 16).

Keywords

ANSARI, S. A., C. NARAYANAN, S. A. WALI, R. KUMAR, N. SHUKLA and S. R. KUMAR (2012): ISSR markers for analysis of molecular diversity and genetic structure of Indian teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) populations. Annals of Forest Research 55(1): 11-23.Search in Google Scholar

BAGCHI, S. K., V. P. SHARMA and P. K. GUPTA (1989): Developmental instability in leaves of Tectona grandis. Silvae Genetica 38: 1-6.Search in Google Scholar

BEDELL, P. E. (1989): Preliminary observations on variability of teak in India. Indian Forest 115: 72-81.Search in Google Scholar

BENDALE, V. W., R. Y. NAIK, J. L. MEHTA, S. G. BHAVE and U. B. PETHE (2005): Variability studies in teak. J. Ecobiol. 17: 29-34.Search in Google Scholar

BHAT, K. M. and P. B. PRIYA (2004): Influence of provenance variation on wood properties of teak from the Western Ghat region in India. Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. J. 25: 273-282.Search in Google Scholar

EARL, D. A. and B. M. VONHOLDT (2012): STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4: 359-361.10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7Search in Google Scholar

EVANNO, G., S. REGNAUT and J. GOUDET (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x15969739Search in Google Scholar

FOFANA, I. J., D. OFORI, M. POITEL and D. VERHAEGEN (2009): Diversity and genetic structure of teak (Tectona grandis L.f) in its natural range using DNA microsatellite markers. New forests 37: 175-195.10.1007/s11056-008-9116-5Search in Google Scholar

FOFANA, I. J., Y. J. LIDAH, N. DIARRASSOUBA, S. P. A. N’GUETTA, A. SANGARE and D. VERHAEGEN (2008): Genetic structure and conservation of Teak (Tectona grandis) plantations in Côte d’Ivoire, revealed by site specific recombinase (SSR). Tropical Conservation Science 1(3): 279-292.10.1177/194008290800100308Search in Google Scholar

HANSEN, O. K., S. CHANGTRAGOON, B. PONOY, E. D. KJÆR, Y. MINN, R. FINKELDEY, K. B. NIELSEN and L. GRAUDAL (2015): Genetic resources of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) - strong genetic structure among natural populations. Tree Genetics & Genomes 11: 802.10.1007/s11295-014-0802-5Search in Google Scholar

HEDEGART, T. (1973): Pollination of Teak (Tectona grandis L.). Silvae Genetica 22: 124-128.Search in Google Scholar

JAKOBSSON, M. and N. A. ROSENBERG (2007): CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801-1806.10.1093/bioinformatics/btm23317485429Search in Google Scholar

KADAMBI, K. (1972): Silviculture and management of teak. School of Forestry, Austin State University, Nacogdoches, Texas.Search in Google Scholar

KAOSA-ARD, A. (1981): Teak (Tectona grandis): Its natural distribution and related factors. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 29: 55-74.Search in Google Scholar

KERTADIKARA, A. W. S. and D. PRAT (1995): Genetic structure and mating system in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) provenances. Silvae Genetica 44: 104-110.Search in Google Scholar

KJÆR, E. D., H. R. SIEGISMUND and V. SUANGTHO (1996): A multivariate study on genetic variation in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Silvae Genetica 45: 361-368.Search in Google Scholar

KJÆR, E. D., S. KAJORNSRICHON and E. B. LAURIDSEN (1999): Heartwood, calcium and silica content in five provenances of teak (Tectona grandis L.). Silvae Genetica 48: 1-3.Search in Google Scholar

KJÆR, E. D. and V. SUANGTHO (1995): Outcrossing rate of teak (Tectona grandis). Silvae Genetica 44: 175-177.Search in Google Scholar

KUANG, B. C. and S. Z. ZHENG (1991): Genetic improvement of teak (Tectona grandis) in China. Forest Research 4(2): 139-146.Search in Google Scholar

LAI, M., LIANG, K. N., G. H. HUANG, M. P. LING, Z. Z. ZHOU and H. M. MA (2011): Genetic variation and comprehensive evaluation in growth and wood relevant properties of different provenances of Tectona grandis. Forest Research 24(2): 234-238.Search in Google Scholar

LI, F., S. GAN, Z. ZHANG, Q. WENG, D. XIANG and M. LI (2011): Microsatellite-based Genotyping of the Commercial Eucalyptus Clones Cultivated in China. Silvae Genetica 60(5): 216-223.10.1515/sg-2011-0029Search in Google Scholar

LIANG, K. N., M. LAI, G. H. HUANG, M. P. LING, Z. Z. ZHOU and H. M. MA (2011): Growth and adaptability of ten provenances of Tectona grandis at 27- year-old. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology 31(4): 8-12.Search in Google Scholar

MINN, Y., K. PRINZ AND R. FINKELDEY (2014): Genetic variation of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) in Myanmar revealed by microsatellites. Tree Genetics and Genome 10: 1435-1449.10.1007/s11295-014-0772-7Search in Google Scholar

MOHANAN, C., J. K. SHARMA and E. J. M. FLORENCE (1997): Nursery diseases of teak in India, pp. 107-112. In: Proceeding of the International Teak Symposium, edited by S. C. BASHA, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Kerala.Search in Google Scholar

MUZZALUPO, I., G. G. VENDRAMIN and A. CHIAPPETTA (2014): Genetic biodiversity of Italian olives (Olea europaea) germplasm analyzed by SSR markers. The Scientific World Journal 2014: 296590.10.1155/2014/296590395868624723801Search in Google Scholar

NARAYANAN, C., A. K. MANDAL and S. A. ANSARI (2007): Molecular markers and their applications in forest trees, pp. 31-56. In: Biotechnology Current Perspectives and Potential Applications, edited by P. C. TRIVEDI, Aavishkar Publishers & Distributors, Jaipur.Search in Google Scholar

NEI, M. (1987): Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.10.7312/nei-92038Search in Google Scholar

NEI, M. (1978): Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.10.1093/genetics/89.3.583Search in Google Scholar

NICODEMUS, A., B. NAGARAJAN, C. NARAYANAN, M. VARGHESE and K. SUBRAMANIAN (2003): RAPD Variation in Indian Teak Populations and its Implications for Breeding and Conservation, pp. 321-330. In: Quallity timer products of teak from sustainable forest management, edited by K. M. BHAT, K. K. N. NAIR, K. V. BHAT, E. M. MURALID - HARAN and J. K. SHARMA, Kerala Forest Research Institute and International Tropical Timber Organization Publication, Kerala.Search in Google Scholar

PARTHIBAN, K. T., C. SURENDRAN, M. PARAMATHMA and K. SASIKUMAR (2003): Molecular Characterization of Teak Seed Source Using RAPD’s, PP. 331-337. In: Quallity timer products of teak from sustainable forest management, edited by K. M. BHAT, K. K. N. NAIR, K. V. BHAT, E. M. MURALIDHARAN and J. K. SHARMA, Kerala Forest Research Institute and International Tropical Timber Organization Publication, Kerala.Search in Google Scholar

PEAKALL, R. and P. E. SMOUSE (2006): Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel, Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288-295.Search in Google Scholar

POWELL, W., G. C. MACHRAY and J. PROVAN (1996): Polymorphisms revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trend. Plant Sci. 1: 215-222.10.1016/S1360-1385(96)86898-0Search in Google Scholar

PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS and P. DONNELLY (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.10.1093/genetics/155.2.945146109610835412Search in Google Scholar

PRIYA, P. B. and K. M. BHAT (1999): Influence of rainfall, irrigation and age on the growth periodicity and wood structure in teak (Tectona grandis). Int. Assoc. Wood Anat. 20: 181-192.Search in Google Scholar

PRIYA, P. B. and K. M. BHAT (1998): False ring formation in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) and the influence of environmental factors. For. Ecol. Manag. 108: 215-222.Search in Google Scholar

ROHLF, F. J. (1998): NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.02. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.Search in Google Scholar

ROSENBERG, N. A. (2004): DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 137-138.10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.xSearch in Google Scholar

ROUBOS, K., M. MOUSTAKAS and F. A. ARAVANOPOULOS (2010): Molecular identification of Greek olive (Olea europaea) cultivars based on microsatellite loci. Genetics and Molecular Research 9(3): 1865-1876.10.4238/vol9-3gmr91620882482Search in Google Scholar

SHRESTHA, M. K., H. VOLKAERT and D. V. D. STRAETEN (2005): Assessment of genetic diversity in Tectona grandis using amplified fragment length Polymorphism markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35(4): 1017.Search in Google Scholar

SLATKIN, M. (1987): Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations, Science 236: 787-792.10.1126/science.35761983576198Search in Google Scholar

VARGHESE, M., A. NICODEMUS, P. K. RAMTEKE, G. ANBAZHAGI, S. S. R. BENNET and K. SUBRAMANIAN (2000): Variation in growth and wood traits among nine populations of teak in Peninsular India. Silvae Genetica 49: 201-205.Search in Google Scholar

VARSHNEY, R. K., A. GRANER and M. E. SORRELLS (2005): Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 48-55.10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.00515629858Search in Google Scholar

VERHAEGEN, D., D. OFORI, I. FOFANA, M. POITEL and A. VAILLANT (2005): Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Tectona grandis (Linn. f). Molecular Ecology Notes 5(4): 945-947.10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01124.xSearch in Google Scholar

VERHAEGEN, D., I. J. FOFANA, Z. A. LOGOSSA and D. OFORI (2010): What is the genetic origin of teak (Tectona grandis L.) introduced in Africa and Indonesia? Tree genetics and genomes 6: 717-733.10.1007/s11295-010-0286-xSearch in Google Scholar

WHITE, K. J. (1991): Teak: Some aspects of research and development. RAPA publication, Bangkok.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo