[ADAMS, W. T. (1983): Application of isozymes in tree breeding. In: Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Eds: TANSKLEY, S. D. and ORTON, T. J. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Part A. pp. 381-400.10.1016/B978-0-444-42226-2.50026-8]Search in Google Scholar
[ADAMS, W. T. and BIRKES, D. S. (1991): Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees. Eds: FINESCHI, S., MALVOLTI, M. E., CANNATA, F., HATTEMER, H. H., pp. 157-172. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands. ]Search in Google Scholar
[ADAMS, W. T. and BURCZYK, J. (2002): Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. Eds: YOUNG, A., BOSHIER, D., BOYLE, T., pp. 215-224. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.10.1079/9780851995045.0215]Search in Google Scholar
[BURCZYK, J., ADAMS, W. T., MORAN, G. F. and GRIFFIN, A. R. (2002): Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighborhood model. Molecular Ecology 11: 2379-2391.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01603.x12406248]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[CONKLE, M. T. (1992): Genetic diversity-seeing the forest through the trees. New Forests 6: 5-22.10.1007/BF00120637]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DEVEY, M. E., BELL, J. C., SMITH, D. N., NEALE, D. B. and MORAN, G. F. (1996): A genetic linkage map for Pinus radiata based on RFLP, RAPD, and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 673-679.10.1007/BF0022608824166390]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DEVEY, M. E., BELL, J. C., UREN, T. L. and MORAN, G. F. (2002): A set of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and breeding applications in Pinus radiata. Genome 45: 984-989.10.1139/g02-06412416633]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[EVETT, I. W. and WEIR, B. S. (1998): Interpreting DNA evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. Sinauer, Sunderland.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOUDET, J. (1995): FSTAT(vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 93: 287-290.]Search in Google Scholar
[HARJU, A. and MUONA, O. (1989): Background pollination in Pinus sylvestris L. seed orchards. Scand. J. For. Res. 4: 513-520.10.1080/02827588909382584]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[JAMIESON, A. (1994): The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Animal Genetics 25: (Suppl 1) 37-44.10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00401.x7943982]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[JONES, A. G. and ARDREN, W. R. (2003): Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 12: 2511-2523.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01928.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MARSHALL, T. C., SLATE, J., KRUUK, L. E. B. and PEMBERTON, J. M. (1988): Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7: 639-655.10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x9633105]Search in Google Scholar
[MORAN, G. F. and BELL, J. C. (1987): The origin and genetic diversity of Pinus radiata in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 73: 616-622.10.1007/BF0028920324241122]Search in Google Scholar
[MORAN, G. F., BELL, J. C. and ELDRIDGE, K. G. (1988): The genetic structure and the conservation of the five natural populations of Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 506-14.10.1139/x88-074]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[NIELSEN, R., MATTILA, D. K., CLAPHAM, P. J. and PALSBØLL, P. J. (2001): Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in naturalpopulations and application to the north Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics 157: 1673-1682.10.1093/genetics/157.4.1673146160011290722]Search in Google Scholar
[PAETKAU, D. and STROBECK, C. (1994): Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Molecular Ecology 3: 489-495.10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00127.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ROEDER, K., DEVLIN, B. and LINDSAY, B. G. (1989): Application of aximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics 45: 363-379.10.2307/2531483]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SLATE, J., MARSHALL, T. and PEMBERTON, J. (2000): A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Molecular Ecology 9: 801-808.10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00930.x10849296]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[TABERLET, P. and LUIKART, G. (1999): Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biol. J. Linnean Society 68: 41-55.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01157.x]Search in Google Scholar
[WHEELER, N. C. and JECH, K. S. (1992): The use of electrophoretic markers in seed orchard research. New Forests 6: 311-328.10.1007/BF00120650]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[WORTHINGTON WILMER, J., ALLEN, P. J., POMEROY, P. P., TWISS, S. D. and AMOS, W. (1999): Where have all the fathers gone? An extensive microsatellite analysis of paternity in the grey seal (Haichoerus grypus). Molecular Ecology 8: 1417-1429.10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00705.x10564447]Search in Google Scholar