1. bookVolumen 24 (2016): Edición 37 (June 2016)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1338-0532
Primera edición
03 Mar 2011
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Selected Aspects of Assessment/Improvement of Academic Research Quality, Also of Industrial Management

Publicado en línea: 30 Jun 2016
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 24 (2016) - Edición 37 (June 2016)
Páginas: 39 - 50
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1338-0532
Primera edición
03 Mar 2011
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

1. ASCB (2012): San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, Putting science into the assessment of research, The American Society for Cell Biology, [on-line], <http://www.ascb.org/dora-old/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf>, April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

2. BOAZ, A., ASHBY, D. 2003. Fit for purpose? Assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice. [working paper No.11] ESRC series of the UK centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice. University of London.Search in Google Scholar

3. CIM (2015): Leaders in Management, Canadian Institute of Management, [on-line], <http://www.cim-winnipeg.ca/index.cfm>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. ELLIOTT, A. 2012. Twenty years inspecting English schools – Ofsted 1992–2012. RISE Review, November, pp. 1-4, No. 283726.Search in Google Scholar

5. ESF (2000): Good scientific practice in research and scholarship, European Science Foundation Policy Briefing, Vol. 10, December, pp. 1-16, ISRN: ESF-SPB-00-10-FR+ENG.Search in Google Scholar

6. EUROSTAT (2015): Glossary: Basic research, Eurostat, [on-line], <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Basic_research>, June 2015.Search in Google Scholar

7. FOGARTY, D. J., BLAKE, J. 2002. Utilising Recent Advancements in Techniques for the Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data to Improve the Data Quality Management of Current Academic Research. Quality & Quantity, 36(3), pp. 277-28. ISSN: 1573-7845.Search in Google Scholar

8. FURLONG, J., OANCEA, A. 2008. Assessing Quality in Applied and Practice-based Educational Research. In: Report No. ERSC RES-618-25-6001. Oxford University Department of Educational Studies.Search in Google Scholar

9. GOLDSTEIN, H. 1998. How can we evaluate educational research? London: Institute of Education, [on-line], <http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmm/migrated/documents/tooley-darby-critique.pdf>, June 2015.Search in Google Scholar

10. HARGREAVES, D. H. 1996. Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. The Teaching Training Agency – Annual Lecture, EPPI-Centre, [on-line], <http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/TTA%20Hargreaves%20lecture.pdf>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

11. IT.JUSTICE.GOV.SK 2012. Koncepcia pre podporu start-upov a rozvoj start-upového ekosystému v SR, It.Justice.Gov.Sk, [on-line], <https://lt.justice.gov.sk/Attachment/Vlastn%C3%BD%20materi%C3%A1l_docx.pdf?instEID=-1&attEID=76576&docEID=417728&matEID=8085&langEID=1&tStamp=20150323092825917>, April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

12. JAFFE, A. B. 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. The American Economic Review, 82(1), pp. 957-970, ISSN: 0002-8282.Search in Google Scholar

13. JALALIAN, M., MAHBOOBI, H. 2014. Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Is There a Need to Re-Think How to Assess the Quality of Academic Research?, Walailak Journal, 11(5), pp. 389-394, ISSN: 1686-3933.Search in Google Scholar

14. JIMA (2014): Introduction of JIMA, Japan Industrial Management Association, [on-line], <http://www.jimanet.jp/english/about-jima/intro>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

15. KENNA, R., BERCHE, B. 2011a. Normalization of peer-evaluation measures of group research quality across academic disciplines. Research evaluation, 20(2), pp. 107-116. ISSN: 0958-2029.Search in Google Scholar

16. KENNA, R., BERCHE, B. 2011b. Managing research quality: critical mass and optimal academic research group size. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 20 (2), pp. 195-207. ISSN: 0958-2029.Search in Google Scholar

17. KOLATA, G. 2013. Scientific articles accepted (Personal Checks, Too). The New York Times, [on-line], <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

18. LILLARD, L., SMITH, J. P., WELCH, F. 1986. What do we really know about wages? The importance of non-reporting and census information. Journal of Political Economy,94, (31), pp. 489-506. ISSN: 0022-3808.Search in Google Scholar

19. LIN, P.H., CHEN, J.R., YANG, CH.H. 2014. Academic research resources and academic quality: A cross-country analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), pp. 109-123, ISSN: 0138-9130.Search in Google Scholar

20. LINDSAY, R., BREEN, R., JENKINS, A. 2002. Academic Research and Teaching Quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 309-327. ISSN: 0307-5079.Search in Google Scholar

21. MTF. 2013. Priemyselné manažérstvo, MTF, [on-line], <http://www.mtf.stuba.sk/sk/studentov/akreditovane-studijne-programy/akreditovane-studijne-programy-ing./priemyselne-manazerstvo.html?page_id=8718>, April 2015.Search in Google Scholar

22. PORTALVS. 2015. Študijný program: priemyselné manažérstvo, PortalVS, [on-line], <http://www.portalvs.sk/sk/studijny-program/priemyselne-manazerstvo0>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

23. RAE. 2008. The Research Assessment Exercise 2008, RAE, [on-line], <http://www.rae.ac.uk/>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

24. RYAN, G. W. 2005. What are Standards of Rigor for Qualitative Research? In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, May 19–20.Search in Google Scholar

25. SILICONVALLEYCF. 2014. Silicon Valley Index. SILICONVALLEYCF, [on-line], <http://www.siliconvalleycf.org/sites/default/files/publications/2014-silicon-valley-index.pdf>, May 2015.Search in Google Scholar

26. SPENCER, L., RITCHIE, J., LEWIS, J., DILLON, L. 2003. Quality of Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: National centre for social research, Government Chief Social Research Office. ISBN: 07715-04465-8.Search in Google Scholar

27. VICENÍK, J. 1988. Spory o charakter metodológie vied. Žilina: Nakladateľstvo Pravda, ISBN (SOC): 075-025-88.Search in Google Scholar

28. ZINKHAN, G., M. 2004. Accessing Academic Research Through an E-Database: Issues of Journal Quality and Knowledge Use. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(4), pp. 369-370, ISSN: 0092-0703.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo