[1. Supplement to the methodology for risk evaluation of biocides Harmonisation of Environmental Emission Scenarios for biocides used as metalworking fluid preservatives (Product type 13) European Commission DG ENV / RIVM. Eur. Comm. DG ENV / RIVM, 2003, p. 61.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. El BARADIE, M., A., CUTTING FLUIDS: PART II. RECYCLING AND CLEAN MACHINING. 1996. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 0136, pp. 798–806.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. BENITO, M., et al. 2002. Design and construction of a modular pilot plant for the treatment of oil-containing wastewaters. Desalination, vol. 147, pp. 5–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. CHENG, C., et al. 2005. Treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Water Res., vol. 39, pp. 4051–4063.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. CHANG, I., et al. 2001. Treatment of oily wastewater by ultrafiltration and ozone. Desalination, vol. 133, pp. 225–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. MUSZYŃSKI, A., ŁEBKOWSKA, M. 2005. Biodegradation of Used Metalworking Fluids in Wastewater Treatment. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 14(1), pp. 73–79.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. C. J. van der GAST, et al. 2004. Temporal dynamics and degradation activity of an bacterial inoculum for treating waste metal-working fluid. Environ. Microbiol., 6(3), pp. 254–263.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. MOSCOSO, F. et al. 2012. Assessment of a process to degrade metal working fluids using Pseudomonas stutzeri CECT 930 and indigenous microbial consortia. Chemosphere, vol. 86, pp. 420–426.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Treatment and disposal of used metalworking fluids CIMCOOL ® Technical Report No. J/N 00/52. Milacron Mark. Co.| Consum. Prod. Div. | Cincinnati, Ohio 45209, pp. 1–2.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. HAUS, F., et al. 2001. Primary biodegradability of mineral base oils in relation to their chemical and physical characteristics. Chemosphere, 45(6–7), pp. 983–990.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. BOYDE, S. 2002. Green lubricants. Environmental benefits and impacts of lubrication. Green Chem., 4(4), pp. 293–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. EKENGREN, R. B. Ö, NIEMINEN, I. Environmentally acceptable metalworking processes, No. A96291. IVL SWEDISH Environ. VTT Res. Inst.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Van Der GAST, C., J., et al. 2001. Identification and characterisation of bacterial populations of an in-use metal-working uid by phenotypic and genotypic methodology. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation, vol. 47, pp. 113–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. van der GAST, C., J., et al. 2002. Selection of microbial consortia for treating metal-working fluids. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 29, pp. 20–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. JAGADEVAN, S., et al. 2011. Harmonisation of chemical and biological process in development of a hybrid technology for treatment of recalcitrant metalworking fluid. Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, pp. 8783–8789.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. BIJAN, L., et al. 2005. Integrated ozone and biotreatment of pulp mill effluent and changes in biodegradability and molecular weight distribution of organic compounds. Water Res., vol. 39, pp. 3763–3772.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. DURÁN-MORENO, et al. 2011. Assessment of Fenton’s reagent and ozonation as pre-treatments for increasing the biodegradability of aqueous diethanolamine solutions from an oil refinery gas sweetening process. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 186, pp. 1652–1659.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.043]Search in Google Scholar
[18. OLLER, I., et al. 2011. Combination of Advanced Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination-A review. Sci. Total Environ., vol. 409, pp. 4141–4166.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. GOGATE, P., R. et al. 2004. A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: Oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Adv. Environ. Res., vol. 8, pp. 501–551.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. MUNTER, R. 2001. Advanced Oxidation Processes - Current Status and Prospect. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Chem., 50(2), pp. 59–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. U. Von GUNTEN. 2003. Ozonation of drinking water: Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res., vol. 37, pp. 1443–1467.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. RATPUKDI, T., et al. 2010. Mineralization and biodegradability enhancement of natural organic matter by ozone-VUV in comparison with ozone, VUV, ozone-UV, and UV: Effects of pH and ozone dose. Water Res., vol. 44, pp. 3531–3543.10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.034]Search in Google Scholar
[23. JAGADEVAN, S., et al. 2013. Treatment of waste metalworking fluid by a hybrid ozone-biological process. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 244–245, pp. 394–402.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Mac ADAM, J., et al. 2012. Incorporating biodegradation and advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Environ. Technol., 33(24), pp. 2741–2750.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. NORR, C. 2001. Modification of the Zahn - Wellens test : determination of the biodegradability of poorly soluble, adsorbing and volatile substances by measurement of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, vol. 44, pp. 553–559.10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00497-5]Search in Google Scholar