This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-41. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152FisherB.AndersonS.BryantJ.MargoleseRG.DeutschM.FisherER.et al.Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy. lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer200234712334110.1056/NEJMoa022152Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 378: 1707-16. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials201137817071610.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bartelink H, Maingon P, Poortmans P, Weltens C, Fourquet A, Jager J, et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 47-56. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71156-8BartelinkH.MaingonP.PoortmansP.WeltensC.FourquetA.JagerJ.et al.Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial201516475610.1016/S1470-2045(14)71156-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strnad V, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G, Kauer-Dorner D, Knauerhase H, Major T, et al. 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 229-38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00471-7StrnadV.OttOJ.HildebrandtG.Kauer-DornerD.KnauerhaseH.MajorT.et al.5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: a randomised. phase 3, non-inferiority trial20163872293810.1016/S0140-6736(15)00471-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vaidya JS, Wenz F, Bulsara M, Tobias JS, Joseph DJ, Keshtgar M, et al. Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 603-13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61950-9VaidyaJS.WenzF.BulsaraM.TobiasJS.JosephDJ.KeshtgarM.et al.Risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast radiotherapy for breast cancer: 5-year results for local control and overall survival from the TARGIT-A randomised trial20143836031310.1016/S0140-6736(13)61950-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Offersen BV, Overgaard M, Kroman N, Overgaard J. Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90: 1-13. 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.005OffersenBV.OvergaardM.KromanN.OvergaardJ.Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review20099011310.1016/j.radonc.2008.08.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Segedin B, Petric P. Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them? Radiol Oncol 2016; 50: 254-62. 10.1515/raon-2016-0023SegedinB.PetricP.Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them?2016502546210.1515/raon-2016-0023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strnad V, Hannoun-Levi JM, Guinot JL, Lössl K, Kauer-Dorner D, Resch A, et al. Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (I): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost Partial Breast Irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving closed cavity surgery. Radiother Oncol 2015; 115: 342-8. 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.010StrnadV.Hannoun-LeviJM.GuinotJL.LösslK.Kauer-DornerD.ReschA.et al.Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (I): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost Partial Breast Irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving closed cavity surgery2015115342810.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Major T, Gutiérrez C, Guix B, van Limbergen E, Strnad V, Polgar C., on behalf of Breast Cancer Working Group of GEC ESTRO. Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (II): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving open cavity surgery. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118: 199-204. 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.006MajorT.GutiérrezC.GuixB.van LimbergenE.StrnadV.PolgarC.on behalf of Breast Cancer Working Group of GEC ESTRO. Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (II): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving open cavity surgery201611819920410.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boersma LJ, Janssen T, Elkhuizen PHM, Poortmans P, van der Sangen M, Scholten AN, et al. Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 178-82. 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.021BoersmaLJ.JanssenT.ElkhuizenPHM.PoortmansP.van der SangenM.ScholtenAN.et al.Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines20121031788210.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vinod SK, Min M, Holloway LC. A review of interventions to reduce interobserver variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016; 60: 393-406. 10.1111/1754-9485.12462VinodSK.MinM.HollowayLC.A review of interventions to reduce interobserver variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology20166039340610.1111/1754-9485.12462Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Park CK, Pritz J, Zhang GG, Forster KM, Harris EE. Validating fiducial markers for image-guided radiation therapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncolo Biol Phys 2012; 82: 425-31. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.027ParkCK.PritzJ.ZhangGG.ForsterKM.HarrisEE.Validating fiducial markers for image-guided radiation therapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer2012824253110.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shaikh T, Chen T, Khan A, Yue NJ, Kearney T, Cohler A, et al. Improvement in interobserver accuracy in delineation of the lumpectomy cavity using fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78: 1127-34. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.025ShaikhT.ChenT.KhanA.YueNJ.KearneyT.CohlerA.et al.Improvement in interobserver accuracy in delineation of the lumpectomy cavity using fiducial markers20107811273410.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coles CE, Wilson CB, Cumming J, Benson JR, Forouhi P, Wilkinson JS, et al. Titanium clip placement to allow accurate tumour bed localisation following breast conserving surgery: audit on behalf of the IMPORT Trial Management Group. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 578-82. 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.005ColesCE.WilsonCB.CummingJ.BensonJR.ForouhiP.WilkinsonJS.et al.Titanium clip placement to allow accurate tumour bed localisation following breast conserving surgery: audit on behalf of the IMPORT Trial Management Group2009355788210.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weed DW, Yan D, Martinez AA, Vicini FA, Wilkinson TJ, Wong J. The validity of surgical clips as a radiographic surrogate for the lumpectomy cavity in image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biolo Phys 2004; 60: 484-92. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.012WeedDW.YanD.MartinezAA.ViciniFA.WilkinsonTJ.WongJ.The validity of surgical clips as a radiographic surrogate for the lumpectomy cavity in image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation2004604849210.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yang JT, Tao R, Elkhuizen PHM, van Vliet Vroegideweij C, Li G, Powell SN. Tumor bed delineation for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108: 181-9. 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.028YangJT.TaoR.ElkhuizenPHM.van Vliet VroegideweijC.LiG.PowellSN.Tumor bed delineation for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: A systematic review2013108181910.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yang Z, Chen J, Hu W, Pan Z, Cai G, Yu X, et al. Planning the breast boost: how accurately do surgical clips represent the CT seroma? Radiother Oncol 2010; 97: 530-4. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.007YangZ.ChenJ.HuW.PanZ.CaiG.YuX.et al.Planning the breast boost: how accurately do surgical clips represent the CT seroma?201097530410.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goldberg H, Prosnitz RG, Olson JA, Marks LB. Definition of postlumpectomy tumor bed for radiotherapy boost field planning: CT versus surgical clips. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 209-13. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.044GoldbergH.ProsnitzRG.OlsonJA.MarksLB.Definition of postlumpectomy tumor bed for radiotherapy boost field planning: CT versus surgical clips2005632091310.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.044Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kirwan CC, Al Sarakbi W, Loncaster J, Chan HY, Thompson Am, Wishart GC. Tumour bed clip localisation for targeted breast radiotherapy: compliance is proportional to trial-related research activity: tumour bed clip localisation in breast radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40: 158-62. 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.016KirwanCC.Al SarakbiW.LoncasterJ.ChanHY.ThompsonAm.WishartGC.Tumour bed clip localisation for targeted breast radiotherapy: compliance is proportional to trial-related research activity: tumour bed clip localisation in breast radiotherapy2014401586210.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kirby AM, Yarnold JR, Evans PM, Morgan VA, Schmidt MA, Scurr ED, et al. Tumor bed delineation for partial breast and breast boost radiotherapy planned in the prone position: what does MRI add to X-ray CT localization of titanium clips placed in the excision cavity wall? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 1276-82. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.028KirbyAM.YarnoldJR.EvansPM.MorganVA.SchmidtMA.ScurrED.et al.Tumor bed delineation for partial breast and breast boost radiotherapy planned in the prone position: what does MRI add to X-ray CT localization of titanium clips placed in the excision cavity wall?20097412768210.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giezen M, Kouwenhoven E, Scholten AN, Coerkam EG, Heijenbrok M, Jansen WPA, et al. MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 1332-40. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.008GiezenM.KouwenhovenE.ScholtenAN.CoerkamEG.HeijenbrokM.JansenWPA.et al.MRI- versus CT-based volume delineation of lumpectomy cavity in supine position in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study20128213324010.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Den Hartogh MD, Phillipens MEP, van Dam IE, Kleynen CE, Tersteeg RJ, Kotte ANTJ, et al. Post-lumpectomy CT-guided tumor bed delineation for breast boost and partial breast irradiation: Can additional pre- and postoperative imaging reduce interobserver variability? Oncol Lett 2015; 10: 2795-801. 10.3892/ol.2015.3697Den HartoghMD.PhillipensMEP.van DamIE.KleynenCE.TersteegRJ.KotteANTJ.et al.Post-lumpectomy CT-guided tumor bed delineation for breast boost and partial breast irradiation: Can additional pre- and postoperative imaging reduce interobserver variability?201510279580110.3892/ol.2015.3697Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mast M, Coerkamp E, Heijenbrok M, Scholten A, Jansen W, Kouwenhoven E, et al. Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value? Radiat Oncol 2014; 9: 65. 10.1186/1748-717X-9-65MastM.CoerkampE.HeijenbrokM.ScholtenA.JansenW.KouwenhovenE.et al.Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?201496510.1186/1748-717X-9-65Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jacobson G, Zamba G, Betts V, Muruganandham M, Buechler-Price J. Image-based treatment planning of the post-lumpectomy breast utilizing CT and 3TMRI. Int J Breast Cancer 2011; 2011: 1-5. 10.4061/2011/246265JacobsonG.ZambaG.BettsV.MuruganandhamM.Buechler-PriceJ.Image-based treatment planning of the post-lumpectomy breast utilizing CT and 3TMRI201120111510.4061/2011/246265Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jolicoeur M, Racine ML, Trop I, Hathout L, Nguyen D, Derashodian T, et al. Localization of the surgical bed using supine magnetic resonance and computed tomography scan fusion for planification of breast interstitial brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 480-4. 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.024JolicoeurM.RacineML.TropI.HathoutL.NguyenD.DerashodianT.et al.Localization of the surgical bed using supine magnetic resonance and computed tomography scan fusion for planification of breast interstitial brachytherapy2011100480410.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petersen RP, Truong PT, Kader HA, Berthelet E, Lee JC, Hilts ML, et al. Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69: 41-8. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.070PetersenRP.TruongPT.KaderHA.BertheletE.LeeJC.HiltsML.et al.Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance20076941810.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.070Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petrič P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Tanderup K, Fidarova E, et al. Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: A multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 6-12. 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014PetričP.HudejR.RogeljP.BlasM.TanderupK.FidarovaE.et al.Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: A multi-institutional study201310761210.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rogelj P, Hudej R, Petrič P. Distance deviation measure of contouring variability. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47(1): 86-96. 10.2478/raon-2013-0005.RogeljP.HudejR.PetričP.Distance deviation measure of contouring variability2013471869610.2478/raon-2013-0005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kouwenhoven E, Giezen M, Struikmans H. Measuring the similarity of target volume delineations independent of the number of observers. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 2863-73. 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/018KouwenhovenE.GiezenM.StruikmansH.Measuring the similarity of target volume delineations independent of the number of observers20095428637310.1088/0031-9155/54/9/018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Segedin B, Logar HB, Dimopoulos JC. Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 242-51. 10.2478/v10019-012-0023-1PetricP.HudejR.RogeljPBlasM.SegedinB.LogarHB.DimopoulosJC.Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy2012462425110.2478/v10019-012-0023-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Landis DM, Luo W, Song J, Bellon JR, Punglia RS, Wong JS, et al. Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 1299-308. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.026LandisDM.LuoW.SongJ.BellonJR.PungliaRS.WongJS.et al.Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity200767129930810.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, Duppen JC; Dutch Young Boost Study Group, van-Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94: 286-91. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009Van MourikAM.ElkhuizenPH.MinkemaD.DuppenJCDutch Young Boost Study Group van-Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines2010942869110.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Struikmans H, Warlam-Rodenhuis C, Stam T., Stapper G, Tersteeg RJ, Bol GH, Raaijmakers CP. Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2005; 76: 293-9. 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.029StruikmansH.Warlam-RodenhuisC.StamT.StapperG.TersteegRJ.BolGH.RaaijmakersCP.Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation200576293910.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hurkmans CW, Admiraal M, van der Sangen M, Dijkmans I. Significance of breast boost volume changes during radiotherapy in relation to current clinical interobserver variations. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90: 60-5. 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.001HurkmansCW.AdmiraalM.van der SangenM.DijkmansI.Significance of breast boost volume changes during radiotherapy in relation to current clinical interobserver variations20099060510.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rasch CRN, Steenbakers RJHM, Fitton I, Duppen JC, Nowak PJ, Pameijer FA, et al. Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5: 21. 10.1186/1748-717X-5-21RaschCRN.SteenbakersRJHM.FittonI.DuppenJC.NowakPJ.PameijerFA.et al.Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer201052110.1186/1748-717X-5-21Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos JCA, Kirisits C, Berger D, Pötter R. CT versus MRI-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized Contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 491-8. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021ViswanathanAN.DimopoulosJCA.KirisitsC.BergerD.PötterR.CT versus MRI-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized Contours200768491810.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
De Brabandere M, Hoskin P, Haustermans K, Van den Heuvel F, Siebert FA. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion. Radiother Oncol 2012; 104: 192-8. 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.014De BrabandereM.HoskinP.HaustermansK.Van den HeuvelF.SiebertFA.Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation. contouring and fusion2012104192810.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Villeirs GM, Van Vaerenbergh K, Vakaet L, Bral S, Claus F, De Neve WJ, et al. Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181: 424-30. 10.1007/s00066-005-1383-xVilleirsGM.Van VaerenberghK.VakaetL.BralS.ClausF.De NeveWJ.et al.Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer20051814243010.1007/s00066-005-1383-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cattaneo GM, Reni M, Rizzo G, Castellone P, Ceresoli GL, Cozzarini C, et al. Target delineation in post-operative radiotherapy of brain gliomas: interobserver variability and impact of image registration of MR(pre-operative) images on treatment planning CT scans. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 217-23. 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.012CattaneoGM.ReniM.RizzoG.CastelloneP.CeresoliGL.CozzariniC.et al.Target delineation in post-operative radiotherapy of brain gliomas: interobserver variability and impact of image registration of MR(pre-operative) images on treatment planning CT scans2005752172310.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weiss E, Hess CF. Comment by E. Weiss and C. F. Hess on G. M. Villeirs et al. “Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer” in: Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181:424-30 (No. 7). Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181: 743-4. 10.1007/s00066-005-9383-4WeissE.HessCF.WeissE.HessC. F.VilleirsG. M.et al.“Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer” in: Strahlenther Onkol200518142430(No. 7)2005181743410.1007/s00066-005-9383-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hegazy N, Pötter R, Kirisits C, Berger D, Federico M, Sturdza A, Nesvacil N. High-risk clinical target volume delineation in CT-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: impact of information from FIGO stage with or without systematic inclusion of 3D documentation of clinical gynecological examination. Acta Oncol 2013; 52: 1345-52. 10.3109/0284186X.2013.813068HegazyN.PötterR.KirisitsC.BergerD.FedericoM.SturdzaA.NesvacilN.High-risk clinical target volume delineation in CT-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: impact of information from FIGO stage with or without systematic inclusion of 3D documentation of clinical gynecological examination20135213455210.3109/0284186X.2013.813068Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GECESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74: 235-45. 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015Haie-MederC.PötterR.Van LimbergenE.BriotE.De BrabandereM.DimopoulosJ.et al.Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GECESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV2005742354510.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Barkati M, Simard D, Taussky D, Delouya G. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016; 60: 255-9. 10.1111/1754-9485.12416BarkatiM.SimardD.TausskyD.DelouyaG.Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study201660255910.1111/1754-9485.12416Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weltens C, Menten J, Feron M, Bellon E, Demaerel P, et al. Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60: 49-59.WeltensC.MentenJ.FeronM.BellonE.DemaerelP.et al.Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging200160495910.1016/S0167-8140(01)00371-1Search in Google Scholar
Buijsen J, van den Bogaard J, van der Heide H, Engelsman S, van Stiphout R, Janssen M, et al. FDG-PET-CT reduces the interobserver variability in rectal tumor delineation. Radiother Oncol 2012; 12: 371-6. 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.016BuijsenJ.van den BogaardJ.van der HeideH.EngelsmanS.van StiphoutR.JanssenM.et al.FDG-PET-CT reduces the interobserver variability in rectal tumor delineation201212371610.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, Grćgoire V. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology 2004; 233: 93-100. 10.1148/radiol.2331030660DaisneJF.DuprezT.WeynandB.LonneuxM.HamoirM.ReychlerH.GrćgoireV.Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT. MR imaging. and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen20042339310010.1148/radiol.2331030660Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khoo V, Adams EJ, Saran F, Bedford JL, Perks JR, et al. A comparison of clinical target volumes determined by CT and MRI for the radiotherapy planning of base of skull meningiomas. Int J Radit Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 1309-17.KhooV.AdamsEJ.SaranF.BedfordJL.PerksJR.et al.A comparison of clinical target volumes determined by CT and MRI for the radiotherapy planning of base of skull meningiomas20004613091710.1016/S0360-3016(99)00541-6Search in Google Scholar
Kass R, Kumar G, Klimberg VS, Kass L, Henry-Tillman R, Johnson A, et al. Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 325-31.KassR.KumarG.KlimbergVS.KassL.Henry-TillmanR.JohnsonA.et al.Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy20021843253110.1016/S0002-9610(02)00952-2Search in Google Scholar
Benda RK, Yasuda G, Sethi A, Gabram SG, Hinerman RW, Mendenhall NP. Breast boost: are we missing a target? Cancer 2003; 97: 905-9. 10.1002/cncr.11142BendaRK.YasudaG.SethiA.GabramSG.HinermanRW.MendenhallNP.Breast boost: are we missing a target?200397905910.1002/cncr.11142Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dzugashvili M, Pichenot C, Dunant A, Balleyquier C, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC, et al. Surgical clips assist in the visualization of the lumpectomy cavity in three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76: 1320-4. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.089DzugashviliM.PichenotC.DunantA.BalleyquierC.DelalogeS.MathieuMC.et al.Surgical clips assist in the visualization of the lumpectomy cavity in three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial-breast irradiation2010761320410.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kovner F, Agay R, Merimsky O, Stadler J, Klausner J, Inbar M. Clips and scar as the guidelines for breast radiation boost after lumpectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 483-6. 10.1053/ejso.1999.0683KovnerF.AgayR.MerimskyO.StadlerJ.KlausnerJ.InbarM.Clips and scar as the guidelines for breast radiation boost after lumpectomy199925483610.1053/ejso.1999.0683Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Krawczyk JJ, Engel B. The importance of surgical clips for adequate tangential beam planning in breast conserving surgery and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 347-50.KrawczykJJ.EngelB.The importance of surgical clips for adequate tangential beam planning in breast conserving surgery and irradiation1999433475010.1016/S0360-3016(98)00402-7Search in Google Scholar
Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23: 903-21. 10.1109/TMI.2004.828354WarfieldSK.ZouKH.WellsWM.Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation2004239032110.1109/TMI.2004.828354Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Major T, Gutierrez C, Guix B, Emoke Mozsa, Hannoun-Levi JM, Lössl K, et al. Interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter partial breast radiotherapy after open cavity surgery. Brachytherapy 2015; 14: 925-32. 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.06.008MajorT.GutierrezC.GuixB.EmokeMozsa.Hannoun-LeviJM.LösslK.et al.Interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter partial breast radiotherapy after open cavity surgery2015149253210.1016/j.brachy.2015.06.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar