[Anderson J., O´Dowd L., 1999. Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies 33(7): 593-604.10.1080/00343409950078648]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreoli M., 1994. Development and marginalisation in Liguria region. In: Chang Y.D. (ed.), Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. Proceedings of the IGU Study Group. Taipei: 41-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Appadurai A., 1997. Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalisation. University of Minesota Press, Minneapolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Atlas rómskych komunít na Slovensku 2004. [online]. [cit. 2016- 01-15]. Available at: http://www.romovia.vlada.gov.sk/20535/atlas-romskych-komunit.php.]Search in Google Scholar
[Atlas rómskych komunít na Slovensku 2013. [online]. Regionálnecentrum rozvojového programu OSN pre Európu a Spoločenstvo nezávislých štátov, Bratislava. [cit. 2016-01-15]. Available at: http://www.minv.sk/?atlas_2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezák P., Mitchley J., 2014. Drivers of change in mountain farming in Slovakia: from socialist collectivisation to the Common Agricultural Policy. Regional Environmental Change 14(4): 1343-1356.10.1007/s10113-013-0580-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Binek J., Svobodová H., 2009. Rozvoj venkova a rozvoj regionů: Společná zemědělská politika a regionální politika na jednom hřišti. Regionální studia 3(1): 12-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Binek J., Svobodová H., Holeček J., Galvasová I., Chabičovská K., 2010. Synergie ve venskovském prostoru - Přístupy k řešení problémů rozvoje venkovských obcí. GaREP Publishing, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Binek J., Svobodová H., Holeček J., Galvasová I., Chabičovská K., 2011. Synergie ve venkovském prostoru - Paradoxy rozvoje venkova. GaREP Publishing, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Binek J., Toušek V., Galvasová I., Vĕžník A., Kunc J., Seidenglanz D., Halásek D., Řehák S., 2007. Venkovský prostor a jeho oživení. Georgetown, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchta S., 2003. Slovenský vidiek na konci dvadsiateho storočia. Sociológia-Slovak Sociological Review 2: 125-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cloke P., 1980. New emphases for applied rural geography. Progress in Human Geography 4: 181-217.10.1177/030913258000400203]Search in Google Scholar
[Cloke P., 2006. Conceptualising rurality. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P. (eds), Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London: 18-28.10.4135/9781848608016.n2]Search in Google Scholar
[Cloke P., Milbourne P., 1992. Deprivation and lifestyles in rural Wales - II. Rurality and the cultural dimension. Journal of Rural Studies 8(4): 359-371.10.1016/0743-0167(92)90050-G]Search in Google Scholar
[Clout H., 1982. Rural settlements. Progress in Human Geography 6(3): 425-430.10.1177/030913258200600305]Search in Google Scholar
[Creamer C., Blair N., Keaveney K., O’Keeffe B., Driscoll J., 2009. Rural restructuring: local sustainable solutions to the rural challenge. International Centre for Local and Regional Development (ICLRD).]Search in Google Scholar
[Danglová O., 2005. Vidiek v procese transformácie. Výsledky etnografického výskumu jedného západoslovenského regiónu. Zing Print, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Danglová O., 2006. Slovenský vidiek. Bariéry a perspektívy rozvoja. Ústav etnológie SAV, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Džupinová E., Halás M., Horňák M., Hurbánek P., Káčerová M., Michniak D., Ondoš S., Rochovská A., 2008. Periférnosť a priestorová polarizácia na území Slovenska. Bratislava, Geo-grafika.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falťan Ľ., Gajdoš P., Pašiak J., 1995. Sociálna marginalita území Slovenska. Social marginality of territories of Slovakia. SPACE Centrum pre analýzu sociálnej politiky, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fáziková M., 2006. Procesy reštrukturalizácie v ekonomickej základni vidieckych regiónov v Slovenskej republike. Acta Regionalia et Environmentalica 3: 1-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrao J., Lopez R., Ferreiro F., 2003. Rurality, peripherality and rural areas in Europe. In: Labrianidis L. (ed.), The future of Europe’s rural periphery, the role of entrepreneurship in responding to employment problems and social marginalisation. EU Research on Social Sciences and Humanities, European Commision’s final report: 66-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajdoš P., 2000. Transformačné zmeny regionálnych štruktúr vidieckej krajiny Horehronia v 20. storočí. Geografické štúdie 7: 77-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajdoš P., Pašiak J., 2008. Sociálne zdroje lokálneho a regionálneho rozvoja. Sociologický ústav SAV, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giddens A., 1984. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodwin M., Cloke P., Milbourne P., 1995. Regulation theory and rural research: Theorising contemporary rural change. Environment and Planning A 27(8): 1245-1260.10.1068/a271245]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregory D., Johnston R., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S., 2009. The dictionary of human geography. 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halás M., 2005. Vidiek v prihraničných regiónoch. In: Spišiak P., Kusendová D., Pavlíčková K., Halás M., Kolény M., Zubriczký G., Švoňavec M., Hurbánek P., Paľuch T., Labuda M. (eds), Agrorurálne štruktúry Slovenska po roku 1989. Geografika, Bratislava: 114-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halás M., 2008. Priestorová polarizáca spoločnosti s detailným pohľadom na periférne regióny Slovenska. Sociologický časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 44(2): 349-369.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.06]Search in Google Scholar
[Halfacree K.H., 1993. Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 23-37.10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Halfacree K.H., 2006. Rural space: Constructing a three-fold architecture. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P. (eds), Handbook of rural studies. Sage, London: 44-62.10.4135/9781848608016.n4]Search in Google Scholar
[Halseth G., Markley S., Bruce D., 2010. The next rural economies. Constructing rural place in global economies. CABI Publishing.10.1079/9781845935818.0000]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlíček T. 2003. Are border regions peripheral regions? In: Kowalczyk A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Warsaw University, Warsaw: 193-197.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlíček T., Chromý P., Jančák V., Marada M., 2005. Vybrané teoreticko-metodologické aspekty a trendy geografického výzkumu periferních oblastí. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 6-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heřmanová E., 1991. Vybrané vícerozměrné statistické metody v geografii. Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, Univerzita Karlova v Praze.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., 1988. Not a definiton of rural. Area 20(1): 35-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., 1990. Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies 6(3): 245-257.10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., Paniagua A., 2001a. What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies 17(1): 41-62.10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00036-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., Paniagua A., 2001b. The restructuring of rural Spain? Journal of Rural Studies 17(1): 63-80.10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00037-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hrabánková M., Rolínek L., Řehoř P., Čermáková A., Navrátil J., 2009. Identifikace sociálnĕ-ekonomických podmínek rozvoje horských a podhorských oblastí. Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budĕjovicích.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hruška V., 2014. Proměny přístupů ke konceputalizaci venkovského prostoru v rurálních studiích. Sociologický časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 4: 581-601.10.13060/00380288.2014.50.4.109]Search in Google Scholar
[Chajdiak J., 2015. Tri poznámky k demografickému vývoju v Slovenskej republike. In: Transformácia slovenskej spoločnosti vo svetle výsledkov posledných troch populačných cenzov. Zborník príspevkov z 15. Slovenskej demografickej konferencie, Trenčianske Teplice, 17-18. septembra 2015, 34-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chajdiak J., Rublíková E., Gudába M., 1997. Štatistické metódy v praxi. STATIS, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chambers R., 1983. Rural development: Putting the last first. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilbery B., 1998. The geography of rural change. Peason Education Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Informačný servis Vúpop. Pôdny portál Výskumného ústavu pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy. [online]. [cit. 2015-01-15]. Available at: http:// www.podnemapy.sk/portal/prave_menu/lfa/lfa.aspx.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ira V., 2003. Rural space in Slovakia: Changes of spatial structures and spatial behavioural patterns. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica 38(1): 119-130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ira V., Huba M., 1999. Changes of rural space in Slovakia from sustainability perspective. Geographica Slovenica 31: 151-161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeřábek M., Dokoupil J., Havlíček T., 2004. České pohraničíbariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Prague.]Search in Google Scholar
[Juhaščíková I., Škápik P., Štukovská Z., 2015. Vplyv transformácie spoločnosti na ekonomickú aktivitu podľa výsledkov troch samostatných cenzov. In: Transformácia slovenskej spoločnosti vo svetle výsledkov posledných troch populačných cenzov. Zborník príspevkov z 15. Slovenskej demografickej konferencie, Trenčianske Teplice, 17-18. septembra 2015, 55-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R., 1998. Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klinda J., 2007. Slovenská Krajina. Enviromagazín 1: 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubeš J., 2000. Problémy stabilizace venkovského osídlení ČR. Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, České Budejovice.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labrianidis L. (ed.). 2004. The future of Europe’s rural peripheries. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lauko V., 2003. Transformation of service network in Bratislava’s hinterland region. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica 38(1): 219-230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibert T., 2013. The peripheralisation of rural areas in post-socialist Central Europe: A case of fragmenting development? Lessons from rural Hungary. In: Naumann M., Fischer-Tahir A. (eds), Peripheralisation: The making of spatial dependencies and social injustice. Springer Science and Business Media: 101-120.10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Leimgruber W., 1994. Marginality and marginal regions: Problems of definition. In: Chang Y.D. (ed.), Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. Proceedings of the IGU Study Group. Taipei: 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leimgruber W., 2004. Between global and local: Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalisation and deregulation. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leimgruber W., Zsilincsar W., Nel E., 2011. Mountain regions in transformation. Global processes, regional and local impacts and responses. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference in Graz and Fribourg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lier H.N., 1996. Sustainable rural systems: Concepts from land use planners perspective. In: Sasaki H., Saito I., Tabayashi A., Morimoto T. (eds), Geographical perspectives on sustainable rural systems. Proceedings of the Tsukuba International Conference on the Sustainability of Rural Systems. Kaisei, Japan: 14-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., 2014. Zmena využitia zeme vo vybraných poľnohospodársky znevýhodnených oblastiach SR. In: Zborník príspevkov študentskej vedeckej konferencie 2014 (Bratislava, 9.4 2014). Prírodovedecká fakulta, Univerzita Komenského: 1437-1442.]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., Farrell M., McDonagh J., 2016. Perception of marginality and peripherality within an Irish rural context. Quaestiones Geographicae 35(4): 93-105.10.1515/quageo-2016-0037]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., Klobučník M., Bačík V., Spišiak P., 2015. Socio- economic changes in the borderlands of the Visegrad Group (V4) countries. Moravian Geographical Reports 23(2): 26-37.10.1515/mgr-2015-0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Marek T., 2004. Sociální sítě, aktéři a instituce v regionálním rozvoji. Sborník prací z mezinárodní vědecké konference Agrární perspektivy XIII. PEF ČZU, Praha: 831-835.]Search in Google Scholar
[Markechová D., Stehlíková B., Tirpáková A., 2011. Štatistické metódy a ich aplikácie. Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, Nitra.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden T., 1998. New rural territories: Regulating the diversified rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 14(1): 107-117.10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden T., Lowe P., Whatmore S., 1990. Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses. David Fulton Publishers Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden T., Murdoch J., Lowe P., Munton R. C., Flynn A., 1993. Constructuring the countryside: An approach to rural development. Routledge, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonagh J. 2001. Renegotiating rural development in Ireland. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonagh J. (ed.), 2002. Economy, society, and peripherality: Experiences from the west of Ireland. Arlen House, Galway.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonagh J., Nienaber B., Woods M., 2015. Globalisation and Europe’s rural regions. Ashgate, Aldershot.10.4324/9781315585086]Search in Google Scholar
[Mehretu A., Pigozzi B.W., Sommers L.M., 2000. Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler 82 B (2): 89-101.10.1111/j.0435-3684.2000.00076.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Meredith D., 2010. Rural areas in transition: Evidence of rural restructuring in the Republic of Ireland. In: Winchell D.D., Ramsey D., Koster R., Robinson G.M., Geographical perspectives on sustainable rural change. Rural Development Institute: 220-242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michálek A., 2015. Identifikácia a zmeny marginálnych regiónov na Slovensku (z aspektu sociálno-ekonomickej marginality). Ekonomický časopis 63(9): 922-943.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikuš R., Máliková L., Lauko V., 2016. An introductory study of perceptual marginality in Slovakia. Bulletin of Geography 34: 47-62.10.1515/bog-2016-0034]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller J., Haden P., 2006. Statistical analysis with the general linear model. Creative Commons Attribution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moseley M.J., 2003. Rural development: Principles and practice. SAGE, London.10.4135/9781446216439]Search in Google Scholar
[Murdoch J., Marsden T., 1994. Reconstituting rurality. Class, community and power in the development process. University College, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murdoch J., Pratt A., 1993. Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’. Journal of Rural Studies 9(4): 321-348.10.1016/0743-0167(93)90053-M]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelles J., Durand F., 2012. Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: Comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies 21(1): 104-122.10.1177/0969776411431103]Search in Google Scholar
[Newman D., 2006. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in a ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography 30(1): 143-161.10.1191/0309132506ph599xx]Search in Google Scholar
[Novotná M., 2011. Problémy venkovských oblastí. Habilitačná práca. Provozně ekonomická fakulta, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze.]Search in Google Scholar
[Novotný L., Hruška V., Egedy T., Mazur M., 2015. Defining rural areas of Visegrad countries. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 39: 21-34.10.7163/SOW.39.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Novotný L., Mazur M., Egedy T., 2015. Definition and delimitation of peripheries of Visegrad countries. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 39: 35-48.10.7163/SOW.39.3]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Dowd L., 2001. State borders, border regions band the construction of European identity. In: Kohli M., Novak M. (eds), Will Europe work? Integration, employment and the social order. Routledge: 95-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paasi A., 2012. Border studies reanimated: Going beyond the territorial/ relational divide. Environment and Planning A 44(10): 2303-2309.10.1068/a45282]Search in Google Scholar
[Pacione M., 1984. Rural geography. Harper and Row, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pelc S., 2011. Demographic trends and threats. In: Leimgruber W., Zsilincsar W., Nel E. (eds), Mountain regions in transformation. Global processes, regional and local impacts and responses. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference in Graz and Fribourg: 47-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pileček J., 2005. Příspěvek k metodice vymezování periferních oblastí: modelové území okresu Prachatice. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 81-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Podolák P., 1999. Demographic aspects of changes in rural areas. Geographica Slovenica 31: 162-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogerson P., 2001. Statistical methods for geography. Sage Publications, London.10.4135/9781849209953]Search in Google Scholar
[Sasaki H., Saito I., Tabayashi A., Morimoto T., 1996. Geographical perspectives on sustainable rural systems. Proceedings of the Tsukuba International Conference on the Sustainability of Rural Systems. Kaisei, Japan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shucksmith M., 1990. The definition of rural areas and rural deprivation. Scottish Homes, Edinburgh.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt M.H., 1998. An integrated systemic approach to marginal regions: from definition to development policies. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 45-66.10.4324/9780429447457-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt M.H., 2007. Some reflections on the definition and delimitation of geographical marginality. In: Jones G., Leimgruber W., Nel E. (eds), Issues in geographical marginality. General and theoretical aspects. International Geographical Union: 34-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt M.H., 2011. Local transformations in mountain areas influenced by globalisation. A case in Mendoza, Argentina. In: Leimgruber W., Zsilincsar W., Nel E. (eds), Mountain regions in transformation. Global processes, regional and local impacts and responses. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference in Graz and Fribourg: 153-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott P., 1998. Development issues in marginal regions. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 1998: 7-26.10.4324/9780429447457-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Sommers L.M., Mehretu A., 1998. International perspectives on socio-spatial marginality. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 135-145.10.4324/9780429447457-10]Search in Google Scholar
[Spišiak P., 1998. Trvalá udržateľnosť rurálnych systémov. In: Implementácia trvalo udržateľného rozvoja. ÚKE SAV, Bratislava: 286.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spišiak P., 2000. Poľnohospodárstvo v marginálnych oblastiach Slovenska. Životné prostredie 34(1): 15-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spišiak P., 2003. Sustainability of rural areas in Slovakia. In: Kowalczyk A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Warsaw University: 277-284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spišiak P., 2005. Rozvoj vidieka v mikroregionálnych štruktúrach Slovenska. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium, Geographica, Supplementum Nr. 3: 567-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spišiak P., Kusendová D., Pavlíčková K., Halás M., Kolény M., Zubriczký G., Švoňavec M., Hurbánek P., Paľuch T., Labuda M. (eds), 2005. Agrorurálne štruktúry Slovenska po roku 1989. Geografika, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tykkyläinen M., 1998. From territorial marginality to marginality in cybersociety. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 123-134.10.4324/9780429447457-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Výskumný ústav pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy (VUPOP). Poľnohospodársky znevýhodnené oblasti SE - LFA. [online]. [cit. 2016-01-15]. Available at: http:// www.podnemapy.sk/portal/prave_menu/lfa/lfa.aspx.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winchell D.D., Ramsey D., Koster R., Robinson G.M., 2010. Geographical perspectives on sustainable rural change. Rural Development Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2005. Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. Sage Publications, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2009. Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography 33(6): 849-858.10.1177/0309132508105001]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2010. The political economies of place in the emergent global countryside: Stories from rural Wales. In: Halseth G., Markley S., Bruce D. (eds), The next rural economies. Constructing rural place in global economies. CA BI Publishing: 166-178.10.1079/9781845935818.0166]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2011. Rural. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203844304]Search in Google Scholar
[Zubriczký G., 2000. Restructuring the rural landscapes in Slovakia. EGEA Magazine 2: 5-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zubriczký G., 2002. Analýza rurálneho priestoru Slovenska z hľadiska rozvojových perspektív jeho osídlenia. Regionálnogeografické štúdie 1: 67-120.]Search in Google Scholar