[1. Bougie, F. & Iliuta, M.C. (2011). CO2 Absorption in Aqueous Piperazine Solutions: Experimental Study and Modeling, J. Chem. Eng. 56, 1547–1554. DOI: 10.1021/je1012247.10.1021/je1012247]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Kohl, A.L. & Nielsen, R.B., Gas Purification, 5th ed., Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, U.S.A., 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Charkravarty, T. & Phuken, U.K. (1985). Reaction of acid gases with mixtures of amines. Chem. Eng. Prog. 40, 32–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Pashaei, P., Nasiri, M. & Ghaemi, A. (2017). Experimental study and modeling of CO2 absorption into diethanolamine solutions using stirrer bubble column. Chem. Eng. Res. Design 121, 32–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.001.10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Norouzbahari, S., Shahhosseini, Sh. & Ghaemi, A. (2015). Modeling of CO2 loading in aqueous solutions of piperazine: Application of an enhanced artificial neural network algorithm. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24, 18–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.011.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Ghaemi, A., Shahhosseini, Sh. & Maragheh, MG. (2009). Nonequilibrium dynamic modeling of carbon dioxide absorption by partially carbonated ammonia solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 149 (1), 110–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.020.10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Nwaoha, C., Saiwan, C., Tontiwachwuthikul, P. & Supap, T., Rongwong W., Idem R., AL-Marri M.J. & Benamor, A. (2016). Carbon dioxide capture: Absorption-desorption capabilities of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) tri-solvent blends. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 33, 742–750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.002.10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Pal, P., Abu Kashabeh, A., Al-Asheh, S. & Banat, F. (2015). Role of aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) as solvent in natural gas sweetening unit and process contaminants with probable reaction pathway. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24, 124–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.007.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Qiu, K., Shang, J.F., Ozturk, M., Li, T.F., Chen, S.K., Zhang, L.Y. & Gu, X.H. (2014). Studies of methyldiethanolamine process simulation and parameters optimization for high-sulfur gas sweetening. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 21, 379–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.08.023.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.08.023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Øi, L.E. (2010). CO2 removal by absorption: challenges in modeling, Math Compu. Model. Dynamic Sys. 16, 511–33. DOI: 10.1080/13873954.2010.491676.10.1080/13873954.2010.491676]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Boettinger, W., Maiwald, M. & Hasse, H. (2008). Online NMR spectroscopic study of species 626 distribution in MEA-CO2-H2O and DEA-H2O-CO2, Fluid Phase Equilibria. 263, 131–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2007.09.017.10.1016/j.fluid.2007.09.017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Pashaei, P., Ghaemi, A. & Nasiri, M. (2016). Modeling and experimental study on the solubility and mass transfer of CO2 into aqueous DEA solution using a stirrer bubble column. RSC Adv. 6, 108075–108092. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA22589F.10.1039/C6RA22589F]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Notz, R., Mangalapally, H.P. & Hasse, H. (2012). Post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption: Pilot plant description and results of systematic studies with MEA. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr. 6, 84–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.004.10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Lee, I.Y., Kwak, N.S., Lee, J.H., Jang, K.R. & Shim, J.G. (2013). Oxidative Degradation of Alkanolamines with Inhibitors in CO2 Capture Process. Energy Proced. 37, 1830–1835. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.061.10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.061]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Luis, P. (2016). Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives. Desalination 380, 93–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.004.10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Freguia, S. & Rochelle, G.T. (2003). Modeling of CO2 Capture by Aqueous Monoethanolamine. AIChE J. 49, 1676–1686. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690490708.10.1002/aic.690490708]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Lv, B., Guo, B., Zhou, Z. & Jing, G. (2015). Mechanisms of CO2 Capture into Monoethanolamine Solution with Different CO2 Loading during the Absorption/Desorption Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10728–10735. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02356.10.1021/acs.est.5b0235626236921]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Xie, H.B., Zhou, Y.Z., Zhang, Y.K. & Johnson, J.K. (2010). Reaction mechanism of monoethanolamine with CO2 in aqueous solution from molecular modeling. J. Phys. Chem. A. 114, 11844–11852. DOI: 10.1021/jp107516k.10.1021/jp107516k20939618]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Wong, K., Bustam, M.A. & Shariff, A.M. (2016). In situ measurement of physical solubility of carbon dioxide in loaded aqueous monoethanolamine by Raman spectroscopy. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 36, 305–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.029.10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.029]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Han, B., Zhou, C.G., Wu, J.P., Tempel, D.J. & Cheng, H.S. (2011). Understanding CO2 capture mechanisms in aqueous monoethanolamine via first principles simulations. J. Physics Chem. Lett. 2, 522–526. DOI: 10.1021/jz200037s.10.1021/jz200037s]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Etemad, E., Ghaemi, A. & Shirvani, M. (2015). Rigorous correlation for CO2 mass transfer flux in reactive absorption processes. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Cont. 42, 288–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.011.10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Moioli, S. & Pellegrini, L.A. & Gamba, S. (2012). Simulation of CO2 capture by MEA scrubbing with a ratebased model. Procedia Eng. 42, 1800–1810. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.558.10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.558]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Rumpf, B. & Maurer, G. (1993). An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation on the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Solutions of Strong Electrolytes. Ber. Bunsengesells. Physik. Chem. 97, 85–97. DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19930970116.10.1002/bbpc.19930970116]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Kent, R.L. & Eisenberg, B. (1976). Better Data for Amine Treating, 87–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ghaemi, A., Torab-Mostaedi, M., Ghannadi Maragheh, M. & Shahhosseini, Sh. (2011). Kinetics and Absorption Rate of CO2 into Partially Carbonated Ammonia Solutions, Chem. Eng. Commun. 198, 1169–1181. DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2010.525204.10.1080/00986445.2010.525204]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Saul, A. & Wagner, W. (1987). International Equations for the Saturation Properties of Ordinary Water Substance. J. Phys. Chem. 16, 893–901. DOI: 10.1063/1.555787.10.1063/1.555787]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Dymond, J.H. & Smith, E.B. The Virial Coefficients of Pure Gases and Mixtures, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1980.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Hayden, J.G. & O’Connell, J.P. (1975). A Generalized Method for Predicting Second Virial Coefficients. Ind. Engi. Chem. Proc. Design Develop. 14, 209–216. DOI: 10.1021/i260055a003.10.1021/i260055a003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Brelvi, S.W., O’Connell, J.P. (1972). Corresponding States Correlations for Liquid Compressibility and Partial Molal Volumes of Gases at Infinite Dilution in Liquids. AIChE J. 18, 1239–1243. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690180622.10.1002/aic.690180622]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[30. Sander, B., Fredenslund, A. & Rasmussen, P. (1986) Calculation of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in Mixed Solvent/Salt Systems using an Extended UNIQUAC Equation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 41, 1171–1183. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(86)87090-7.10.1016/0009-2509(86)87090-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Thomsen, K. (2005). Modeling electrolyte solutions with the extended universal quasi chemical (UNIQUAC) model. Pure Appl. Chem. 77, 531–542. DOI: 10.1351/pac200577030531.10.1351/pac200577030531]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Aronu, U.E., Gondal, Sh., Hessen, E.T., Haug-Warberg, T., Hartono, A., Hoff, K.A. & Svendsen, H.F., (2011). Solubility of CO2 in 15, 30, 45 and 60 mass% MEA from 40 to 120°C and model representation using the extended UNIQUAC framework. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 6393–6406. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.042.10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.042]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Dugass, R.E. (2009). Carbon Dioxide Absorption, Desorption, and Diffusion in Aqueous Piperazine and Monoethanolamine, PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Lagarias, J.C., Reeds, J.A., Wright, M.H. & Wright, P.E. (1998). Convergence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 9, 112–147. DOI: 10.1137/S1052623496303470.10.1137/S1052623496303470]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar