Construction mediation and its hybridization: the case of the Hong Kong construction industry
y
22 jun 2017
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Research Article
Publicado en línea: 22 jun 2017
Páginas: 1528 - 1536
Recibido: 15 dic 2016
Aceptado: 10 may 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0015
Palabras clave
© 2017 Pui-Lam Ng et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
In view of the sophisticated nature of construction disputes, specialized dispute resolution mechanisms are of pivotal importance to the satisfactory settlement between disputing parties. Among the various construction dispute resolution mechanisms, mediation has been increasingly gaining recognition and acceptance. Its hybrid, namely mediation–arbitration (med-arb), has also emerged and has started receiving attention and appreciation. With special reference to the construction industry practice in Hong Kong, a commentary on the respective merits and demerits of construction mediation and construction med-arb, as well as the ways forward, are presented in this article.