<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The tax gap between taxes that are “actually” paid and taxes that “ought” to have been paid by multinational corporate entities has become an area of huge public policy concern in the recent decades. This study reviews the impact of new legislation to reveal the tax gap created by the EU banks and financial institutions passed in 2013 and in particular of the quality of the resulting country-by-country reporting (CBCR) requirement for banks. Although resulting tax gap estimates are noted, they suffer due to significant problems in the published data; much of it is due to the quality of the regulation requiring its publication and implementation. The findings reveal a lack of understanding of the technical and structural weaknesses of accounting in a transnational context in the design of this regulation. CBCR is destined to fail in achieving its regulatory objectives in this context unless necessary reform of the regulation is undertaken.</p>
</abstract>

The tax gap between taxes that are “actually” paid and taxes that “ought” to have been paid by multinational corporate entities has become an area of huge public policy concern in the recent decades. This study reviews the impact of new legislation to reveal the tax gap created by the EU banks and financial institutions passed in 2013 and in particular of the quality of the resulting country-by-country reporting (CBCR) requirement for banks. Although resulting tax gap estimates are noted, they suffer due to significant problems in the published data; much of it is due to the quality of the regulation requiring its publication and implementation. The findings reveal a lack of understanding of the technical and structural weaknesses of accounting in a transnational context in the design of this regulation. CBCR is destined to fail in achieving its regulatory objectives in this context unless necessary reform of the regulation is undertaken.

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="j_ntaxj-2019-0005_fn_001">1</xref></sup>

Professor of Practice in International Political Economy

Nordic Tax Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting

The tax gap between taxes that are “actually” paid and taxes that “ought” to have been paid by multinational corporate entities has become an area of huge...

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting¹

Article Category: Article

Publicado en línea: 25 mar 2020

Páginas: 63 - 86

Recibido: 31 may 2019

Aceptado: 22 oct 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2019-0005

Palabras clave
Tax gaps, Tax avoidance, Accounting, Policy-making, Country-by-country reporting, CRD IV

© 2019 Richard Murphy et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting1

Article Category: Article

Publicado en línea: 25 mar 2020

Páginas: 63 - 86

Recibido: 31 may 2019

Aceptado: 22 oct 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2019-0005

Palabras claveTax gaps, Tax avoidance, Accounting, Policy-making, Country-by-country reporting, CRD IV

© 2019 Richard Murphy et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

BEPS Policy Failure—The Case of EU Country-By-Country Reporting¹

Palabras clave
Tax gaps, Tax avoidance, Accounting, Policy-making, Country-by-country reporting, CRD IV