Tensions, Challenges and Issues in Evaluating Communication for Development: Findings from Recent Research and Strategies for Sustainable Outcomes

Armytage, L. (2011) ‘Evaluating Aid: An Adolescent Domain of Practice’, Evaluation 17(3): 261–276. ArmytageL. 2011 ‘Evaluating Aid: An Adolescent Domain of Practice’ Evaluation 17 3 261 276 10.1177/1356389011410518 Search in Google Scholar

Balit, S. (2010a) ‘Communicating With Decision Makers’, Glocal Times 14. http://webzone.k3.mah.se/projects/gt2/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=181&issueID=21 BalitS. 2010a ‘Communicating With Decision Makers’ Glocal Times 14 http://webzone.k3.mah.se/projects/gt2/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=181&issueID=21 Search in Google Scholar

Balit, S. (2010b) ‘Communicating With Decision Makers (continued)’ Glocal Times 14. http://webzone.k3.mah.se/projects/gt2/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=183&issueID=21 BalitS. 2010b ‘Communicating With Decision Makers (continued)’ Glocal Times 14 http://webzone.k3.mah.se/projects/gt2/viewarticle.aspx?articleID=183&issueID=21 Search in Google Scholar

Bamberger, M., Rao, V. and Woolcock, M. (2010) Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development. Manchester: The World Bank Development Research Group. BambergerM. RaoV. WoolcockM. 2010 Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development Manchester The World Bank Development Research Group 10.1596/1813-9450-5245 Search in Google Scholar

Burns, D. (2007) Systemic Action Research: A Strategy for Whole System Change. Bristol: The Policy Press. BurnsD. 2007 Systemic Action Research: A Strategy for Whole System Change Bristol The Policy Press 10.2307/j.ctt9qgvn5 Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, A. (2008) ‘Evaluating Social Change and Communication for Social Change: New Perspectives’, MAZI 17. ByrneA. 2008 ‘Evaluating Social Change and Communication for Social Change: New Perspectives’ MAZI 17 Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, A. and Vincent, R. (2011) Evaluating Social Change Communication for HIV/AIDS: New Directions. Communication for Social Change Consortium for UNAIDS, Geneva. ByrneA. VincentR. 2011 Evaluating Social Change Communication for HIV/AIDS: New Directions Communication for Social Change Consortium for UNAIDS Geneva 10.1002/9781118241868.ch14 Search in Google Scholar

Conlin, S. and Stirrat, R. (2008) ‘Current Challenges in Development Evaluation’, Evaluation 14(2): 193–208. ConlinS. StirratR. 2008 ‘Current Challenges in Development Evaluation’ Evaluation 14 2 193 208 10.1177/1356389007087539 Search in Google Scholar

David, R. and Mancini, A. (2011) ‘Participation, learning and accountability: The role of the activist academic’, in Cornwall, A. and Scoones, I. (eds.) Revolutionizing Development: Reflections on the Work of Robert Chambers. London: Earthscan. DavidR. ManciniA. 2011 ‘Participation, learning and accountability: The role of the activist academic’ in CornwallA. ScoonesI. (eds.) Revolutionizing Development: Reflections on the Work of Robert Chambers London Earthscan 10.4324/9781003298632-35 Search in Google Scholar

Davies, R. and Dart, J. (2005) The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique. A Guide to Its Use. http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/MSCGuide.pdf DaviesR. DartJ. 2005 The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique. A Guide to Its Use http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/MSCGuide.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Earl, S., Carden, F. and Smutylo, T. (2001) Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: IDRC. EarlS. CardenF. SmutyloT. 2001 Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs Ottawa IDRC Search in Google Scholar

Feek, W. and Morry, C. (2009) Fitting the Glass Slipper! Institutionalising Communication for Development Within the UN. A Discussion Document. 11th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development, Washington DC, 11–13 March, 2009. FeekW. MorryC. 2009 Fitting the Glass Slipper! Institutionalising Communication for Development Within the UN. A Discussion Document 11th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development Washington DC 11–13 March, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

Hay, K. (2010) ‘Evaluation Field Building in South Asia’, American Journal of Evaluation 31(2): 222–231. HayK. 2010 ‘Evaluation Field Building in South Asia’ American Journal of Evaluation 31 2 222 231 10.1177/1098214010366175 Search in Google Scholar

Horton, D., Alexaki, A., Bennett-Lartey, S. et al. (2003) Evaluating Capacity Development: Experiences from Research and Development Organizations Around the World. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research. HortonD. AlexakiA. Bennett-LarteyS. 2003 Evaluating Capacity Development: Experiences from Research and Development Organizations Around the World The Hague International Service for National Agricultural Research Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, N. (2007) ‘Communicating the Impact of Communication for Development. Recent Trends in Empirical Research’, Working Paper Series No. 120, Washington DC: World Bank. InagakiN. 2007 ‘Communicating the Impact of Communication for Development. Recent Trends in Empirical Research’ Working Paper Series No. 120, Washington DC World Bank 10.1596/978-0-8213-7167-1 Search in Google Scholar

Jallov, B. (2012) Empowerment Radio. Voices Building a Community. Gudhjem: Empowerhouse. JallovB. 2012 Empowerment Radio. Voices Building a Community Gudhjem Empowerhouse Search in Google Scholar

Jones, H. (2011) ‘Taking Responsibility for Complexity: How Implementation can Achieve Results in the Face of Complex Problems’, ODI Working Papers 330, June 2011, London: Overseas Development Institute. JonesH. 2011 ‘Taking Responsibility for Complexity: How Implementation can Achieve Results in the Face of Complex Problems’ ODI Working Papers 330 June 2011 London Overseas Development Institute Search in Google Scholar

Lacayo, V. (2006) Approaching Social Change as a Complex Problem in a World That Treats It as a Complicated One. The Case of Puntos De Encuentro. Nicaragua. Master of Arts thesis (Communication and Development), Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. LacayoV. 2006 Approaching Social Change as a Complex Problem in a World That Treats It as a Complicated One The Case of Puntos De Encuentro. Nicaragua. Master of Arts thesis (Communication and Development), Ohio University Athens, Ohio Search in Google Scholar

Leeuw, F. and Vaessen, J. (2009) Impact Evaluations and Development. NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation. Washington DC: The Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation. LeeuwF. VaessenJ. 2009 Impact Evaluations and Development. NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation Washington DC The Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J. and Tacchi, J. (2011) Researching, Monitoring and Evaluating Communication for Development: Trends, Challenges and Approaches. Report on a Literature Review and Consultations with Expert Reference Group and UN Focal Points on C4D. Prepared for the United Nations Inter-Agency Group on Communication for Development. New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/cbsc/files/RME-RP-Evaluating_C4D_Trends_Challenges__Approaches_Final-2011.pdf LennieJ. TacchiJ. 2011 Researching, Monitoring and Evaluating Communication for Development: Trends, Challenges and Approaches Report on a Literature Review and Consultations with Expert Reference Group and UN Focal Points on C4D. Prepared for the United Nations Inter-Agency Group on Communication for Development. New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/cbsc/files/RME-RP-Evaluating_C4D_Trends_Challenges__Approaches_Final-2011.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J. and Tacchi, J. (2013) Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change. Abingdon: Routledge. LennieJ. TacchiJ. 2013 Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change Abingdon Routledge 10.4324/9780203078495 Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J. and Tacchi, J. (2014) ‘Bridging the Divide Between Upward Accountability and Learning-Based Approaches to Development Evaluation: Strategies for an Enabling Environment’. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 14 (1), 12–23. LennieJ. TacchiJ. 2014 ‘Bridging the Divide Between Upward Accountability and Learning-Based Approaches to Development Evaluation: Strategies for an Enabling Environment’ Evaluation Journal of Australasia 14 1 12 23 10.1177/1035719X1401400103 Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J., Tacchi, J., Koirala, B. et al. (2011) Equal Access Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. Queensland University of Technology, University of Adelaide, and Equal Access Nepal. http://betterevaluation.org/toolkits/equal_access_participatory_monitoring. LennieJ. TacchiJ. KoiralaB. 2011 Equal Access Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit Queensland University of Technology, University of Adelaide, and Equal Access Nepal. http://betterevaluation.org/toolkits/equal_access_participatory_monitoring. Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J., Tacchi, J. and Wilmore, M. (2012) ‘Meta-Evaluation to Improve Learning, Evaluation Capacity Development and Sustainability: Findings from a Participatory Evaluation Project in Nepal’, South Asian Journal of Evaluation in Practice 1(1): 13–28. LennieJ. TacchiJ. WilmoreM. 2012 ‘Meta-Evaluation to Improve Learning, Evaluation Capacity Development and Sustainability: Findings from a Participatory Evaluation Project in Nepal’ South Asian Journal of Evaluation in Practice 1 1 13 28 Search in Google Scholar

Liamputtong, P. (2007) Researching the Vulnerable. A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. London: Sage. LiamputtongP. 2007 Researching the Vulnerable. A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods London Sage 10.4135/9781849209861 Search in Google Scholar

Midgley, G. (2006) ‘Systems thinking for evaluation’, in Williams, B. and Imam, I. (eds.) Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. American Evaluation Association. MidgleyG. 2006 ‘Systems thinking for evaluation’ in WilliamsB. ImamI. (eds.) Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology American Evaluation Association Search in Google Scholar

Miskelly, C., Hoban, A. and Vincent, R. (2009) How Can Complexity Theory Contribute to More Effective Development and Aid Evaluation? Dialogue at the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund. London: Panos. MiskellyC. HobanA. VincentR. 2009 How Can Complexity Theory Contribute to More Effective Development and Aid Evaluation? Dialogue at the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund London Panos Search in Google Scholar

Parks, W., Gray-Felder, D., Hunt, J. and Byrne, A. (2005) Who Measures Change: An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change. New Jersey: Communication for Social Change Consortium. ParksW. Gray-FelderD. HuntJ. ByrneA. 2005 Who Measures Change: An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change New Jersey Communication for Social Change Consortium Search in Google Scholar

Patton, M.Q. (2011) Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press. PattonM.Q. 2011 Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use New York Guilford Press Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, J. (2011) Creative Capacity Development: Learning to Adapt in Development Practice. Sterling VA: Kumarian Press. PearsonJ. 2011 Creative Capacity Development: Learning to Adapt in Development Practice Sterling VA Kumarian Press Search in Google Scholar

Puddephatt, A., Horsewell, R. and Menheneott, G. (2009) Discussion Paper on the Monitoring and Evaluation of UN-Assisted Communication for Development Programmes. Recommendations for Best Practice Methodologies and Indicators, 11th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development, Washington DC, 11–13 March, 2009. PuddephattA. HorsewellR. MenheneottG. 2009 Discussion Paper on the Monitoring and Evaluation of UN-Assisted Communication for Development Programmes Recommendations for Best Practice Methodologies and Indicators, 11th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development Washington DC 11–13 March, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

Quarry, W. and Ramirez, R. (2009) Communication for Another Development. London: Zed Books. QuarryW. RamirezR. 2009 Communication for Another Development London Zed Books 10.5040/9781350219274 Search in Google Scholar

Raeside, A. (2011) ‘Are INGOs Brave Enough to Become Learning Organisations?’, in Ashley, H., Kenton, N. and Milligan, N. (eds.) How Wide are the Ripples? From Local Participation to International Organisational Learning, Participatory Learning and Action 63: 97–102. RaesideA. 2011 ‘Are INGOs Brave Enough to Become Learning Organisations?’ in AshleyH. KentonN. MilliganN. (eds.) How Wide are the Ripples? From Local Participation to International Organisational Learning, Participatory Learning and Action 63 97 102 Search in Google Scholar

Ramalingam, B and Jones, H. with Reba, T. and Young, J. (2008) Exploring the Science of Complexity: Ideas and Implications for Development and Humanitarian Efforts, ODI Working Paper 2nd ed., London: Overseas Development Institute. RamalingamB JonesH. RebaT. YoungJ. 2008 Exploring the Science of Complexity: Ideas and Implications for Development and Humanitarian Efforts, ODI Working Paper 2nd ed. London Overseas Development Institute Search in Google Scholar

Rattine-Flaherty, E. and Singhal, A. (2009) ‘Analyzing Social-Change Practice in the Peruvian Amazon through a Feminist Reading of Participatory Communication Research’, Development in Practice 17(6): 726–736. Rattine-FlahertyE. SinghalA. 2009 ‘Analyzing Social-Change Practice in the Peruvian Amazon through a Feminist Reading of Participatory Communication Research’ Development in Practice 17 6 726 736 10.1080/09614520903026884 Search in Google Scholar

Servaes, J., Polk, E., Shi, S. et al. (2012) ‘Towards a Framework of Sustainability Indicators for “Communication for Development and Social Change” Projects’, The International Communication Gazette 74(2): 99–123. ServaesJ. PolkE. ShiS. 2012 ‘Towards a Framework of Sustainability Indicators for “Communication for Development and Social Change” Projects’ The International Communication Gazette 74 2 99 123 10.1177/1748048511432598 Search in Google Scholar

Skuse, A. (2006) Voices for Change: Strategic Radio Support for Achieving the Millennium Development Goal. London: DFID. SkuseA. 2006 Voices for Change: Strategic Radio Support for Achieving the Millennium Development Goal London DFID Search in Google Scholar

Souter, D. (2008) ‘Investigation 4: Impact Assessment’, in BCO Impact Assessment Study. The Final Report, Building Communication Opportunities Alliance. SouterD. 2008 ‘Investigation 4: Impact Assessment’ in BCO Impact Assessment Study The Final Report, Building Communication Opportunities Alliance. Search in Google Scholar

Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J. et al. (2012) Broadening the Range of Designs and Methods for Impact Evaluation. DFID Working Paper 38. SternE. StameN. MayneJ. 2012 Broadening the Range of Designs and Methods for Impact Evaluation DFID Working Paper 38. 10.22163/fteval.2012.100 Search in Google Scholar

Tacchi, J., Fildes, J., Martin, K. et al. (2007) Ethnographic Action Research Training Handbook. http://ear.findingavoice.org/ TacchiJ. FildesJ. MartinK. 2007 Ethnographic Action Research Training Handbook http://ear.findingavoice.org/ Search in Google Scholar

Tacchi, J. and Lennie, J. (2014) ‘A Participatory Framework for Researching and Evaluating Communication for Development and Social Change’ In K.G. Wilkins, T. Tufte and R. Obregon (eds.) The Handbook on Development Communication and Social Change. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell: 298–320. TacchiJ. LennieJ. 2014 ‘A Participatory Framework for Researching and Evaluating Communication for Development and Social Change’ In WilkinsK.G. TufteT. ObregonR. (eds.) The Handbook on Development Communication and Social Change Chichester, UK Wiley Blackwell 298 320 10.1002/9781118505328.ch18 Search in Google Scholar

Tacchi, J., Lennie, J. and Wilmore M. (2013) ‘Critical Reflections on the use of Participatory Methodologies to Build Evaluation Capacities in International Development Organisations’. In S. Goff (ed.) From Theory to Practice; Context in Praxis. Selected Papers from the 8^th Action Learning, Action Research World Congress Australia 2010, Toowong, Queensland: Action Learning Action Research Association: 150–160. TacchiJ. LennieJ. WilmoreM. 2013 ‘Critical Reflections on the use of Participatory Methodologies to Build Evaluation Capacities in International Development Organisations’ In GoffS. (ed.) From Theory to Practice; Context in Praxis. Selected Papers from the 8th Action Learning, Action Research World Congress Australia 2010 Toowong, Queensland Action Learning Action Research Association 150 160 Search in Google Scholar