1. bookVolumen 85 (2021): Edición 1 (June 2021)
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
16 Apr 2017
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
access type Acceso abierto

The Theoretical Quadruple Helix Model for Digital Inclusion Increase

Publicado en línea: 08 Oct 2021
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 85 (2021) - Edición 1 (June 2021)
Páginas: 13 - 32
Recibido: 15 Apr 2021
Aceptado: 30 Jul 2021
Detalles de la revista
Primera edición
16 Apr 2017
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año

The aim of this paper is to conceptualize the theoretical quadruple helix model in the field of digital inclusion. It explores the literature on digital inclusion issues, stakeholder’s roles and investigates the main features of the quadruple helix model and its application possibilities in the digital inclusion context. Building on the findings of this literature review, the theoretical quadruple helix model for digital inclusion is proposed. This paper contributes to the literature on digital inclusion and lays a conceptual basis for further theoretical and empirical research in this field.


1. Al-Muwil, A., Weerakkody, V., El-haddadeh, R., Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Balancing Digital-By-Default with Inclusion: A Study of the Factors Influencing E-Inclusion in the UK // Information Systems Frontiers. Vol. 22, pp. 635–659. Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrade, A. D., Techatassanasoontorn, A. A. (2020). Digital Enforcement: Rethinking the Pursuit of a Digitally - Enabled Society // Inf Syst J. Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 184–197. Search in Google Scholar

3. Aslam, A., Naveed, A., Shabbir, G. (2020). Is it an Institution, Digital or Social Inclusion That Matters for Inclusive Growth? A Panel Data Analysis // Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01008-310.1007/s11135-020-01008-3 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bertot, J. C. (2016). Building Digitally Inclusive Communities: The Roles of Public Libraries in Digital Inclusion and Development // ICEGOV ‘15-16, Conference Proceedings. pp. 95–102. Search in Google Scholar

5. Beyne, W. M. (2018). Digital Inclusion in Library Context: A Perspective from Users with Print Disability // Journal of Web Librarianship. Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 121–140. doi.org/10.1080/1 9322909.2018.1427657 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bokolo, A. (2021). Exploring Data Driven Initiatives for Smart City Development: Empirical Evidence from Techno-stakeholders’ Perspective // Urban Research & Practice. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2020.186981610.1080/17535069.2020.1869816 Search in Google Scholar

7. Bonina, C., López-Berzosa, D., Scarlata, M. (2020). Social, Commercial, or Both? An Exploratory Study of the Identity Orientation of Digital Social Innovations // Inf Syst J. pp. 1–22. Search in Google Scholar

8. Borg, K., Smith, L. (2018). Digital Inclusion and Online Behaviour: Five Typologies of Australian Internet Users // Behaviour & Information Technology. Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 367–380. Search in Google Scholar

9. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem // Int. J. Technology Management. Vol. 46, Issue 3/4, pp. 201–234.10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 Search in Google Scholar

10. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., Stamati, D. (2018). The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory-Building Study of Regional Co-Opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/ Quintuple Helix Innovation Models // R&D Management. Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 148–162. Search in Google Scholar

11. Caruso, S. (2014). Creating Digital Communities: A Resource to Digital Inclusion. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

12. Chandler, D., Werther, W. B. (2014). Strategic Corporate Responsibility: Stakeholders, Globalization and Sustainable Value creation. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, California. Search in Google Scholar

13. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 92–11. Search in Google Scholar

14. Damodaran, L., Gilbertson, T., Olphert, W., Sandhu, J., Craig, M. (2015). Digital Inclusion – The Vision, the Challenges and the Way Forward // International Journal on Advances in Internet Technology. Vol. 8, Issue 3–4. Search in Google Scholar

15. Dangi, T. B., Gribb, W. J. (2018). Sustainable Ecotourism Management and Visitor Experiences: Managing Conflicting Perspectives in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA // Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 338–358. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2018.150225010.1080/14724049.2018.1502250 Search in Google Scholar

16. Domanski, D., Kaletka, C. (2017). Exploring the Research Landscape of Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project Social Innovation Community (SIC). Dortmund, Germany: Sozialforschungsstelle. Search in Google Scholar

17. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations // Research Policy. Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 109–123.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 Search in Google Scholar

18. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. – Boston: Pitman. Search in Google Scholar

19. Gallardo, R. (2019). Bringing Communities into the Digital Age // State and Local Government Review. Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 233–241. Search in Google Scholar

20. Gallardo, R., Beaulieu, L. B., Geideman, C. (2020). Digital Inclusion and Parity: Implications for Community Development // Community Development. Vol. 52, Issue 1, pp. 4–21. doi:10.1080/15575330.2020.183081510.1080/15575330.2020.1830815 Search in Google Scholar

21. Gangadharan, S. P. (2017). The Downside of Digital Inclusion: Expectations and Experiences of Privacy and surveillance Among Marginal Internet Users // New Media & Society. Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 597–615. Search in Google Scholar

22. Gann, B. (2019). Digital Inclusion and Health in Wales // Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 146–160. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2019.1608499.10.1080/15398285.2019.1608499 Search in Google Scholar

23. Gann, B. (2019). Transforming Lives: Combating Digital Health Inequality // International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 187–198. Search in Google Scholar

24. Gann, B. (2020). Combating Digital Health Inequality in the Time of Coronavirus // Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 278–284. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2020.179167010.1080/15398285.2020.1791670 Search in Google Scholar

25. Graves, S. J., German E. (2018). Evidence of Our Values: Disability Inclusion on Library Instruction Websites // Libraries and the Academy. Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 559–574. Search in Google Scholar

26. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., Sá de Abreu, M. C. (2015). Stakeholder Theory as an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: Applying the Theory to Multiple Contexts // Review Business Management. Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 858–869. Search in Google Scholar

27. Hasche, N., Höglund, L., Linton, G. (2020). Quadruple Helix as a Network of Relationships: Creating Value within a Swedish Regional Innovation System // Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. Vol. 32, Issue 6, pp. 523–544. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2019.164313410.1080/08276331.2019.1643134 Search in Google Scholar

28. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion // Communication Theory. Vol. 22, pp. 403–426. Search in Google Scholar

29. Helsper, E. J., Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The Emergence of a “Digital Underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing Reasons for Digital Exclusion // New Media & Society. Vol. 19, Issue 8, pp. 1253–1270. Search in Google Scholar

30. Hernández-Pérez, O., Vilariño, F., Domènech, M. (2020). Public Libraries Engaging Communities through Technology and Innovation: Insights from the Library Living Lab // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 26, Issue 1. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2020.184504710.1080/01616846.2020.1845047 Search in Google Scholar

31. Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., Rose, J. (2019). Digital Inclusion for Elderly Citizens for a Sustainable Society // In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). pp. 8–14, ISBN 978-1-7336325-0-8. Search in Google Scholar

32. Ilse M., Leo Van A., (2012). Towards a Multi-Stakeholders Approach for Digital Inclusion: A Case Study of Ghent’s ‘Digital.Talent’ Policy Program // IAMCR Conference proceedings, pp. 1–13 Search in Google Scholar

33. Johnston, N. (2020). The Shift towards Digital Literacy in Australian University Libraries: Developing a Digital Literacy Framework // Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. Vol. 69, Issue 1, pp. 93–101. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2020.171263810.1080/24750158.2020.1712638 Search in Google Scholar

34. Kaletka, C., Pelka, B. (2015). Digital) Social Innovation Through Public Internet Access Points // Springer International Publishing. M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): UAHCI, Part I, pp. 201–212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_2010.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_20 Search in Google Scholar

35. Kang, Y., Jiang, J. (2020). Revisiting the Innovation Systems of Crossborder Cities: The Role of Higher Education Institution and Cross-Boundary Cooperation in Hong Kong and Shenzhen // Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 213–229. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2019.170184910.1080/1360080X.2019.1701849 Search in Google Scholar

36. Khazaei, A., Elliot, S., Joppe, M. (2015). An Application of Stakeholder Theory to Advance Community Participation in Tourism Planning: The Case for Engaging Immigrants as Fringe Stakeholders // Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 23, Issue 7, pp. 1049–1062. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2015.104248110.1080/09669582.2015.1042481 Search in Google Scholar

37. Kriz, A., Bankins, S., Molloy, C. (2017). Readying a Region: Temporally Exploring the Development of an Australian Regional Quadruple Helix // R & D Management. Vol. 48, Issue 1. doi: 10.1111/radm.1229410.1111/radm.12294 Search in Google Scholar

38. Mahon, J. F., Heugens, P., McGowan, R. A. (2016). Blending Issues and Stakeholders: In Pursuit of the Elusive Synergy // Journal of Public Affairs. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.163510.1002/pa.1635 Search in Google Scholar

39. Makkonen T, Kahila P. (2020). Vitality Policy as a Tool for Rural Development in Peripheral Finland // Growth and Change. Vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 706–726. doi: 10.1111/grow.1236410.1111/grow.12364 Search in Google Scholar

40. Manzoor, M., Vimarlund, V. (2018). Digital Technologies for Social Inclusion of Individuals with Disabilities // Health and Technology. Vol. 8, pp. 377–390. doi: 10.1007/ s12553-018-0239-1 Search in Google Scholar

41. Manžuch, Z., Macevičiūtė, E. (2020). Getting Ready to Reduce the Digital Divide: Scenarios of Lithuanian Public Libraries // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 71, pp. 1205–1217. Search in Google Scholar

42. Marques, C., Marques, A. V., Braga, V., Ratten, V. (2020). Technological Transfer and Spillovers Within the RIS3 Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Quadruple Helix Approach // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.177790910.1080/14778238.2020.1777909 Search in Google Scholar

43. McAdam, M., Miller, K., McAdam, R. (2018). Understanding Quadruple Helix Relationships of University Technology Commercialisation: A Micro-Level Approach // Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 1058–1073.doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.121232810.1080/03075079.2016.1212328 Search in Google Scholar

44. Mehmood, A., Imran, M. (2021). Digital Social Innovation and Civic Participation: Toward Responsible and Inclusive Transport Planning // European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.188294610.1080/09654313.2021.1882946 Search in Google Scholar

45. Mitchel, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22, Issue 4, pp. 853–886. Search in Google Scholar

46. Noh, Y. (2019). A Comparative Study of Public Libraries’ Contribution to Digital Inclusion in Korea and the United States // Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Vol. 51, Issue 1, pp. 59–77. Search in Google Scholar

47. Phelps, K. (2017). Designing a Leadership-based Inquiry into Community Digital Literacy Initiatives // Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 54, Issue 1, pp. 770–772. doi: 10.1002/ pra2.2017.14505401151 Search in Google Scholar

48. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. (2017). Social Capital and the Three Levels of Digital Divide // In Ragnedda M., Muschert G. eds. (2017), Theorizing Digital Divides, Routledge, pp. 21–34.10.4324/9781315455334-3 Search in Google Scholar

49. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring Digital Capital: An Empirical Investigation // New Media & Society. Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 793–816. Search in Google Scholar

50. Rashid, A. T. (2016). Digital Inclusion and Social Inequality: Gender Differences in ICT Access and Use in Five Developing Countries // Technology and Development. Vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 306–332. doi: 10.1177/097185241666065110.1177/0971852416660651 Search in Google Scholar

51. Real, B., McDermott, A. J., Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T. (2015). Digital Inclusion and the Affordable Care Act: Public Libraries, Politics, Policy, and Enrollment in ‘Obamacare’ // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 34, Issue. 1, pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2015.100077010.1080/01616846.2015.1000770 Search in Google Scholar

52. Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 82, Issue 1, pp. 233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9573-310.1007/s10551-007-9573-3 Search in Google Scholar

53. Rutherford, L., Singleton, A., Derr, A., Merga, M. K. (2018). Do Digital Devices Enhance Teenagers’ Recreational Reading Engagement? Issues for Library Policy from a Recent Study in Two Australian States // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 318–340. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214.10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214 Search in Google Scholar

54. Steurer, R. (2006). Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business– Society Relations // Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 15, pp. 55–69. Search in Google Scholar

55. Strover, S. (2019). Public Libraries and 21st Century Digital Equity Goals // Communication Research and Practice. Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 188–205. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2019.160148710.1080/22041451.2019.1601487 Search in Google Scholar

56. Strover, S., Whitacre, B., Rhinesmith, C., Schrubbe, A. (2020). The Digital Inclusion Role of Rural Libraries: Social Inequalities through Space and Place // Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 242–259. doi: 10.1177/016344371985350410.1177/0163443719853504 Search in Google Scholar

57. Terstriep, J., Rehfeld, D., Kleverbeck, M. (2020). Favourable Social Innovation Ecosystem(s)? – An Explorative Approach // European Planning Studies. Vol. 28, Issue 5, pp. 881–905. Search in Google Scholar

58. Tomaževič, N., Tekavčič, M., Peljhan, D. (2017). Towards Excellence in Public Administration: Organisation Theory-based Performance Management Model // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Vol. 28, Issue 5-6, pp. 578–599. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.110204810.1080/14783363.2015.1102048 Search in Google Scholar

59. Towner, N. (2018). Surfing Tourism and Local Stakeholder Collaboration // Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 268–286. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2018.150350310.1080/14724049.2018.1503503 Search in Google Scholar

60. Williams, F., Philip, L., Farrington, J., Fairhurst, G. (2016). ‘Digital by Default’ and the ‘Hard to Reach’: Exploring Solutions to Digital Exclusion in Remote Rural Areas // Local Economy. Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 757–777.10.1177/0269094216670938 Search in Google Scholar

61. Winn M. (2001). Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modelling Methodology // Business Society. Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 133–166. Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo